Abstract
After escorting Saint-Arnaud over the crude and bumpy road that led to Balaclava, the spahis returned for service about the person of the new French commander, Canrobert.1 The particular choice of who was to succeed Saint-Arnaud had been as much a mystery to the British headquarters as it was to most of the French generals. Some were even unconvinced that Saint-Arnaud had recognized his imminent death and given up the command voluntarily. Rather, they believed that he had been relieved because of the Dobrudja affair.2 They had guessed that Canrobert would succeed the Marshal and when this proved to be the case, their anxiety turned to relief. In common with Saint-Arnaud, the British at this time regarded Canrobert as a competent officer. “His bravery is without question, and he is esteemed one of their best generals.”3 Raglan wrote to the Duke of Newcastle that he viewed Saint-Arnaud’s retirement “with deep concern” since the Marshal always had “every disposition to act in concert with me... Fortunately,” he went on, “he is succeeded by an officer of high reputation, General Canrobert, with whom I am satisfied I shall have great pleasure in acting, and who is equally desirous of maintaining the most friendly relations with me.”4 While Canrobert’s service in Algeria and demonstrated courage in battle made him popular among the French troops, he was reputed an exacting administrator as well. Raglan would now, perhaps, be able to get along better with the French headquarters. This was both the British hope and expectation.5
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
encourt, pp. 152-153; Wellesley and Sencourt, pp. 62-63; Eckstaedt, I, 87; and Theodore Martin, Life of the Prince Consort (5 vols., London, 1875–1880), III, 87–125.
C. L. de Bazancourt, L’Expédition de Crimée jusqu’à La Prise de Sébastopol (3rd ed., 2 vols., Paris, 1856), I, 320–327.
Eckstaedt, I, 88-90; and Augustus Loftus, The Diplomatic Reminiscences of Lord Augustus Loftus 1832–1862 (2 vols., London, 1892), I, 227.
Calthorpe, I, 333-335, 339-340, 343. Menschikoff had indeed “sent to Lord Raglan to tell him he regretted that in the course of a few days he would be compelled to destroy the whole allied army!” See A. H. Taylor, “Letters from the Crimea,” JRUSI, CII (1957), 81.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1959 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gooch, B.D. (1959). First Rebuffs. In: The New Bonapartist Generals in the Crimean War. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1001-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1001-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0398-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1001-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive