Skip to main content
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

The question of how far a literary form is appropriate to any given period is a basic one. In the case of the epic the whole problem is an especially acute and pressing one. For probably no opinion is, or has been, more widely and uncritically accepted in literary discussion than that which contends, usually as a matter of indisputable fact, that the epic is a thing of the past. The epic is believed to have long proved its unfitness for what we have to say and to have consequently ceased to exist or at least to be of any relevance or significance. On the other hand, however, the fact remains that the desire to write epic poetry has not altogether died out. Again and again writers have selected the epic, or something more akin to the epic than to anything else, as the most suitable form for whatever they had to say. In a study in which we intend to investigate the products of such writers over the past one hundred years or so, we shall do well to deal with this general problem at the very outset.

“... das Epos ist verkümmert, und wenn heute ein zweiter Homer geboren würde, so trüge die Erde einen Unglücklichen mehr, aber wir würden keine zweite Iliade erhalten.” Friedrich Hebbel

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For a discussion of the relationship of the German “Klassik” to the epic see: Busch, Ernst, “Das Verhältnis der deutschen Klassik zum Epos”, Germanisch Romanische Monatsschrift, XXIX-XXX (1941/42), pp. 257–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spielhagen, Friedrich, “Die epische Poesie und Goethe”, Goethe-Jahrbuch, XVI (1895), pp. 3*–29*.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Humboldt, Wilhelm von, Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. von der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, B. Behr’s Verlag, 1904, Volume II, see: “Ästhetische Versuche. Erster Teil. Über Goethes Hermann und Dorothea”, particularly pp. 269 and 306/07.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Schriften, München, Carl Hauser Verlag, 1956, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Werke, hrsg. von H. G. Hotho, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot, 1843, Volume X, 395.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vischer, Friedrich Theodor, Aesthetik oder Wissenschaft des Schönen, hrsg. von Robert Vischer, München, Meyer und Jessen, 1923, Volume VI, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tillyard, E. M. W., The English Epic and its Background, London, Chatto and Windus, 1954, 530.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lukács, Georg von, “Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschiehtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der grossen Epik”, Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, XI (1916), 248. Two articles appeared in this issue of the journal on pp. 225-71 and pp. 390-431. They represent the core of the material which later appeared as the book of the same title.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kayser, Wolfgang, Das Sprachliche Kunstwerk, Bern, A. Francke AG — Verlag, 1948, 361.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seidler, Herbert, Die Dichtung, Stuttgart, Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1959, 535/36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Staiger, Emil, Grundbegriffe der Poetik, Zürich, Atlantis Verlag, 1961, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adorno, Theodor, W., Noten zur Literatur, Berlin und Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1958, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamburger, Käte, “Beobachtungen über den urepischen Stil”, Trivium, VI (1948), pp. 89–122. A complete reprint of Trivium has been published by Herbert Lang & Cie AG, Bern, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamburger, Kate, “Zum Strukturproblem der epischen und dramatischen Dichtung”, Deutsche Vierteljahrschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, XXV (1951), pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maiworm, Heinrich, “Epos der Neuzeit”, contained in: Deutsche Philologie im Aufriss, 1. Auflage, hrsg. von W. Stammler, Berlin/Bielefeld, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1954, Volume II, columns 713/14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan, Wilhelm, Epische Briefe, Frankfurt am Main, W. Jordan’s Selbstverlag, 1876, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spitteler, Carl, Gesammelte Werke, hrsg. von G. Bohnenblust, Zürich, Artemis-Verlag, 1947, Volume VIII, “Ästhetische Schriften”, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See: Ernst, Paul, Ein Credo, München, Albert Langen-Georg Müller Verlag, 1935, Chapter on “Vom deutschen Epos”.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Döblin, Alfred, “Der Bau des epischen Werks”, Die Neue Rundschau, XL (Jan.-June, 1929), 536.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eliot, Thomas Stearns, The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism, London, Faber and Faber Ltd., 1933, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lublinski, Samuel, Der Ausgang der Moderne, Dresden, Verlag von Carl Reissner, 1909, 188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1967 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schueler, H.J. (1967). The Viability of the Epic. In: The German Verse Epic in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0959-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0959-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0377-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0959-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics