Skip to main content

Judgment and Being

  • Chapter
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout the Essais, Montaigne treats the subject of thinking well on two levels, that is for Montaigne in particular and for man in general. As he looks about him and at history, he sees bad habits of thought linked to moral degeneracy. Consequently, he conceives of judgment as an intellectual and moral faculty, an instrument that can correct man’s cognitive and moral deficiencies. Montaigne has witnessed its efficiency and capability within himself; self-trial, not antiquated principles of authority, is the touchstone of his mounting confidence in his ability to think correctly and recognize relative truths.

“The proper study of mankind is man”

Alexander Pope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paul De Man, “Montaigne et la transcendence,” Critique, IX (1953), 1017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chapter II, “The Emotional Nature of Man,” pp. 54–61 and “Deficiency: A Practical Guide,” pp. 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 618: Thibaudet and Rat, ed. OEuvres complètes de Montaigne, p. 1768.

    Google Scholar 

  4. André Lalande, Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie (Paris, 1960), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emile Littré, Dictionnaire de la langue française (Paris, 1882 ), I, 744–745.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Inbrie Buffum, L’Influence du voyage de Montaigne sur les Essais (Princeton, 1946), p.53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Floyd Gray, Le Style de Montaigne (Paris, 1958), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexandre Micha, “Montaigne et le drame de l’intellect,” Mercure de France, 303 (1948), 459.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Floyd Gray, “The Unity of Montaigne in the Essais,” Modern Language Quarterly, XXII (1961), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donald M. Frame, “What Next in Montaigne Studies?,” French Review, XXXVI (1963), 58x.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a detailed study of this question, see S. Hamel, “Experience-Essai. Contribution à l’étude du vocabulaire de Montaigne,” BSAM, 11–12 (1959), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Michaut, ed. De l’institution des enfants (Paris, 1924), P. 19, n. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lanson, Les Essais de Montaigne, p. 112, no. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferdinand Brunetière, “Publications récentes sur Montaigne,” Revue des deux mondes, XXXV (1906), 215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

La Charité, R.C. (1968). Judgment and Being. In: The Concept of Judgment in Montaigne. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0919-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0919-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0357-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0919-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics