Abstract
After the Convention of the Pardo, nothing further stood in the way of the Congress. The ratifications of the Preliminaries concluded with Spain at Vienna were exchanged at the same place on the ist. of May, and on the 14th. of June the Congress was to meet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 423–8; Syveton, op. cit. 256—′62.
Droysen, op. cit. I, 446–7, 451–3, II, 6–9, 13–19.
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 364–5, cf. 331, 362.
cf Van Hoey to Slingelandt, 12 Mch. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2979; Pesters to Slingelandt, 10 June ′28, enclosed in Slingelandt to Townshend, 11 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 297.
Baudrillart, op. cit III, 428; Townshend to Finch, 6 Feby., 12 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299; Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 20 Mch. ′28, enclosed in Townshend to Slingelandt, 15 Mch ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Fénelon to Chauvelin, 17 Feby., 18 Mch. ′28, R. A. Hl. 373; Mémoires, A. E. Mem. et Doc., France 459 f. 128—′32, 496 f. 53–119, 497 f. 19–20; Villars, Mémoires V, 121, 125.
Townshend to Finch, 6 Feby. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299. Referring to the latin text of the Preliminaries (Art. 8), the King of England desired to limit the duration of the Congress to 4 months from the conclusion of the Convention of the Pardo (Townshend to Slingelandt, 15 Mch. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994, cf Fénelon to Chauvelin, 1 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl. 374).
Pribram, op. cit. I, 464–6.
“Considérations qui peuvent servir à donner quelque idée des mesures préalables que les Alliés devraient concerter entre eux pour régler leur conduite au congrès de Cambrai,” memorial of Horace Walpole, R. O. Hl. 294; private instructions of Townshend to Waldegrave, 26 Oct. ′27, R. O. Germany 62; Townshend to Finch, 6 Feby. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299; Townshend to Slingelandt, 26 Jany., 15 Mch. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Coxe, R. W. II, 550. Jorissen, op. cit. 63–5, is mistaken in thinking England had much to ask from the Congress, cf Townshend to Chesterfield, 25 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300: “By a fair interpretation of the words of the preliminary treaty all the important interests of the King and the States are already determined, and ought not therefore, strictly speaking, to be brought anymore into debate.” The Republic and Sweden had both joined the Hanover alliance, without however entering into any engagement as regards each other. Now to render the union of all members of the alliance as close as possible, Horace Walpole desired that these powers should make the engagements they were each under to England and France mutual between themselves.
Townshend to Waldegrave, 15 Feby. ′28, R. O. Germany 62; cf. Townshend to Slingelandt, 26 Jany, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 9 Apr. with enclosure, 21 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 19 May ′28, B. M. Add. 32755; cf. Eng. Hist. Rev. XVI, 311.
Townshend to Finch, 12 Mch. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299; cf. King, Notes 63.
Jorissen, op. cit. 28–31.
Huisman, op. cit. 457–9.
Seer. Res. Hl. 17 Feby ′28.
Fénelon to Chauvelin, 27 Feby, 12 Mch ′28, A. E. Hl. 373.
Finch to Townshend, 24 Feby., 9 Mch. ′28, Townshend to Finch, 20 Feby. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299; Townshend to Slingelandt, 15 Mch ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Townshend to Finch, 15 Mch. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299, Townshend to Slingelandt, 15 Men. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Chesterfield once wrote to Townshend (17 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301), “it is impossible for the Spaniards themselves to be more uneasy at our trade to the West Indies than the Dutch are.”
Secr. Res. S. G. 30 Apr. ′28 (instructions for the plenipotentiaries).
Slingelandt to Hop, 7 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974; cf. Slingelandt to Townshend, S June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Fénelon to Chauvelin, 20 Feby ′27, A. E. Hl. 373; Fénelon, Mémoire 155; Res. S. G. 22 Aug., 16 Dec. ′27, 1 Mch. ′28; Wiarda, op. cit. VII, XXXIIes Buch, erster Abschnitt.
cf King, Notes 62.
Fénelon to Chauvelin, 17, 27 Feby., 18 Mch., 1 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl. 373, 374.
A. de Saint Léger, La Flandre maritime et Dunkerque sous la domination française (Paris-Lille, 1900), 308 et seq, 318–9; Finch to Townshend, 19 Aug. ′27 with enclosures, 2 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 294, 299.
Secr. Res. S. G. 15 Mch. ′28; Res. S. G. 12 Feby. ′28; Finch to Townshend, 20 Feby. 23 Mch., 9 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299.
“Mémoire ou considérations au sujet du future Congrès, fait le dernier de Mars 1728” in Jorissen, op. cit. 266 et seq.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 9 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301. 2) cf King, Notes 62–6.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 29 Mch. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 19 Apr. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Finch to Townshend, 13, 16 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 410 note. The following observations concerning the policy of France are built upon a number of memorials, A. E. Mem. et Doc. France 459, f. 98–107, 128–132, 162–9; 494, f. in— 121, 122–9, 162–184; 497, f. 19–20, 42–3, 45–9, 62–3, 97–100, 170–177; A. E. Hl. 366 f. 263–7; and further upon the secret instructions to the plenipotentiaries, 30 May ′28, Mem. et Doc. France 496, f. 53–119, of which Baudrillart has also made use, op. cit. III, 408 et seq.
This is said expressly in the secret instructions to the plenipotentiaries; so it is erroneous to ascribe to the Cardinal the opinion that “the combination of England and the Emperor would be too strong for France and Spain,” as has been done (Eng. Hist. Rev. XVI, 318).
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 119, 212 et seq, 226, 256, 314–6, 365–70; Broglie, Le Cardinal de Fleury et la Pragmatique Sanction, Revue Historique XX (1882), 257 et seq.
Huisman, op. cit., 79; Bourgeois, Manuel I, 294.
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 321.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 411.
Morville to Fénelon, 19 June ′27, A. E. Hl. 369.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 20 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 18 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl. 374.
Chauvelin to Fénelon, 19 Feby. ′28, Fénelon to Chauvelin, 18, 30 Mch. ′28, A. E. Hl. 373.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 20. May. ′28, A. E. Hl. 374.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 25 Apr., 24 June, La Baune to Chauvelin, 10 May ′28, A. E. Hl. 374.
King, Notes 58.
Fénelon or La Baune to Chauvelin, 9 Feby., 30 Apr. ′28, Chauvelin to La Baune, 10 June ′28, A. E. Hl. 374.
Fénelon, Mémoire, 155–6; Fénelon or La Baune to Chauvelin, 20 Feby., 23, 30 Mch., 30 Apr. ′28, Chauvelin to Fénelon or La Baune, 4 Mch., 18 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl. 373, 374.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 26 Aug., 23 Dec. ′28, 3 Feby., 28 Aug. ′29 A. E. Hl. 375, 376, 377.
Dureng, Mission de Chavigny en Allemagne (Paris, 1911) 54, 58–60; Auerbach, La France et le Saint-Empire Romain Germanique (Paris 1912) 294.
Höfler, Der Congress von Soissons, Fontes Rerum Austriacarum, XXXII, 7, 43, 81, 330, XXXVIII, 247.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 17 May ′28, A. E. Hl. 374. 2) Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 432 et seq, cf. 424 et seq.
Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 20 Mch ′28, enclosed in Townshend to Slingelandt, 15 Mch. ′28, Townshend to Slingelandt, 9 Apr. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; King, Notes, 56–7, 60–66; Chauvelin to La Baune, 25 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl. 374; Mémoires, A. E. Mem. et Doc. France 459, f. 98–107, 497 f. 45–9. That Pesters’ memorial was virtually that of Horace Walpole, we infer from two circumstances. The ten points it contained are all of them, except the last, agreeable to the English method? and not to the resolution of the States of 15 Mch. ′28 or to Slinge-landt’s system. Secondly, it is expressly said that Pesters had drawn it up in collaboration with Horace Walpole (Finch to Townshend, 6 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299; the memorial is enclosed in this).
Townshend to Slingelandt, 9 Apr. ′28, and its enclosures: Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 14 Apr. ′28, and the instructions to Keene, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 19 Apr. 28, in Townshend to Slingelandt, 12 Apr. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 25 Apr. ′27, La Baune to Chauvelin, 30 Apr. ′28, A. E. Hl.
374.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 7, 20 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 7 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 20 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
What Rosenlehner (op. cit., 424) tells about this union, is not correct. Wolfenbüttel and Wurtemberg were the original parties. Saxe-Gotha and Hesse-Cassel soon joined (Townshend to Dehn, 4 June, in Townshend to Slingelandt, 7 June ′28; Townshend to Slingelandt, 18 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994); much later, as will be seen afterwards, the Kings of England and Sweden in their capacity of Princes of the Empire.
Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 19 Apr. ′28, in Townshend to Slingelandt, 12 Apr. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
cf. Townshend to Finch, 30 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl. 299.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 May ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Instructions to Stanhope, Walpole and Poyntz, in Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 May, ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 14 Apr. ′28, enclosed in the following letter, Townshend to Slingelandt, 12 Apr. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 19 May ′28, B. M Add. 32755, cf Slingelandt to Townshend, 7 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 14 May ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Townshend to Finch, 20 Feby. ′28, the same to Chesterfield, 30 Apr. ′28, R. O. Hl 299, 300,
Secr. Res. S. G. 7 May; Res. S. G. 8 May, 1, 5 June ′28.
Secr. Res. S. G. 29 May, 1 June ′28; Res. S. G. 23 June ′28.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 May ′28, R. O. Hl. 300. 2) Chesterfield to Townshend, 1 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300
Slingelandt to Townshend, 8 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; of Slingelandt to Hop, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Secr. Res. S. G. 18, 19 May, 1 June ′28; Chesterfield to Townshend, 21 May, Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 May ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Such representations had been made lately, in virtue of the resolution of 1 Mch. ′28. Instances had also been made with Prussia (Rive, op. cit. 116–7).
Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 May ′28, with enclosures, R. O. Hl. 300; Slingelandt to Townshend, 8 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 2994. The Aulic Council seems to have done so at the request of the Prince of East Frisia, cf. Res. S. G. 9 July ′28, Rousset, op. cit. IV, 501.
Res. S. G. 25 May ′28.
cf. Wiarda op. cit. VII, 83 note.
Droysen, op. cit. I, 213–4, II, 11–13, 26–27; Förster, Friedrich Wilhelm I, II, 105,
Townshend to Chesterfield, 17, 21 May ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 4 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300. A remarkable conversation between Slingelandt and Fénelon with reference to Mecklenburg is related in Fénelon to Chauvelin, 27 Feby. ′28, A. E. Hl. 373.
Chesterfield now entered into relations with Sande, the Duke’s representative at the Hague. As to their negotiations, cf. R. O. Hl. 300 and subsequent bundles.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 31 May, 4 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Fénelon to Chauvelin, 27 Feby. ′28, A. E. Hl. 373; Mémoires de Villars, V, 128, 131.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 8 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; Chesterfield to Townshend, 1, 8 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 11 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; enclosed with this is an extract from Beilanger to Gansinot, 4 June ′28. As to the conversation between Sinzen-dorff and Unertl, cf. Rosenlehner, op. cit. 378. Here, at the beginning of the negotiations carried on in 1728—′29 between the Maritime Powers and France and the four Electors, particularly the Elector Palatine, we must give a warning against Slothouwer’s article: “Un effort pour la formation d’un Fürstenbund en 1728.” Rev. d’Hist. Diplomatique XIII (1899), 188 et seq. It is absolutely unreliable.
cf Rosenlehner, op. cit., 423.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 7 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 7 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Slingelandt to Hop, 6 Nov. ′28, cf. id. to Goslinga, 7 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
English Plenipotentiaries to Newcastle, 20 June ′28, B. M. Add. 32757; Syveton, op. cit. 260—′1. At first only the English plenipotentiaries were informed of it, Goslinga not. That he was informed of it, is probably due to Chauvelin. At all events the latter advised the Cardinal to so inform him, arguing that if he did not do so himself, Horace Walpole would do so, in spite of his promise of secrecy, in order in this way to gain the Dutch against France (Chauvelin to Fleury, 16 June ′28, A. E. Mem. et Doc. France 497, f. 227 et seq).
Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 26 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974 (damaged draft of the whole letter) and R. O. Hl. 297 (undamaged but incomplete copy)
Townshend to Slingelandt, 14 June o. s. 1728, R. A. Hl. 2994. 2) Slingelandt to Townshend, 29 June ′28, ibid.
English plenipotentiaries to Newcastle, 20 June ′28, B. M. Add. 32757; Townshend to Chesterfield, 18 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 2 July ′23, id. to Hop, 7 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994, 2974.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 430—′1.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 430—′1.
Although it is not quite certain, it is very probable that the idea of a provisional treaty originated with Sinzendorff. Cf. Archiv für Oesterreichische Geschichte, XLVI, p. 136; Townshend to Waldegrave, 28 Jan. ′29, R. O. Germany 64.
Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 1 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985; cf. Huisman, op cit. 437 et seq.
Horace Walpole to Newcastle, 25 June ′28, B. M. Add. 32755; Chesterfield to Townshend, 6 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301; Slingelandt to Hop, 7 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Hop to Slingelandt, 1 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982; Townshend to Chesterfield, 25 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
Slingelandt to Hop, 7, 16, 21 July, id. to Goslinga, 7, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974. 2) Chesterfield to Townshend, 6 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Jorissen, op. cit. 279.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 25 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300
Chesterfield to Townshend, 9 July ′28, Townshend to Chesterfield, 2 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 18 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300.
id. to id., 25 June ′28, ibid.
id. to id., 28 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
id. to id., 2 July ′28, ibid.
Secret instructions to the French plenipotentiaries, 30 May ′28, A. E. Mem. et Doc. France 496.
Broglie to Chauvelin, 18 June ′28, A. E. Angleterre 362.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 20 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 July ′28, id. to Townshend, 16 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974, 2994.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 3 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301: Slingelandt to Hop, 23 Oct. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Poyntz to Chesterfield, 13 July ′28, Chesterfield to Townshend, 16 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301. We have presented as Slingelandt’s opinion those objections of Chesterfield against such an alliance which Slingelandt agreed with. The remark regarding the English government was made by the Pensionary himself. In another conversation with Chesterfield he said, such a treaty was at the best so much “waste paper” (Chesterfield to Townshend, 27 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301).
Slingelandt to Townshend, 16 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Leadam, op cit. 322, 337; Eng. Hist. Rev. XV, 266; Pesters to Slingelandt, 2 Nov. ′27, R. A. Hl. 2981.
Townshend to Poyntz, 3 June ′28, in Coxe, R. W. II, 631.
id. to Chesterfield, 9 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 12 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; cf. Townshend to Chesterfield, 9 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
In the beginning, at the request of Elizabeth, Brancas did, indeed, counteract the abdication, but was soon ordered not to do so any longer, Baudrillart op cit. III, 417–8.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 29 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994; cf. Chesterfield to Townshend, 6, 9, 27 July, 3 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 20 July ′28, Townshend to Chesterfield, 19 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 23 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 6, 13, 17 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Slingelandt to Townshend, 13 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994. 2) Townshend to Chesterfield, 6, 13 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 13 Aug. ′28, ibid.
Cf. Van Ittersum to Townshend, 25 May, 8 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 296.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 9 Jan. ′30, in Jorissen, op. cit. 123. Jorissen has put a wrong construction upon this letter.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 3 June, 7 July ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Jorissen, op cit. 122–5; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 27 May ′30, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 23 Dec. ′28, 3 Apr., 1 June ′30, A. E. Hl. 375, 379, 381. 2) Slingelandt to Goslinga, 7 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Baudrillart, op cit. III, 435–7. 2) ibid., 431–2, 440—′1, 578–9.
Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 8 July, Hop to the same, 29 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985, 2982: Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 440—′1.
Slingelandt to Hop, 7, 16, 21 July, 5, 7 Aug. ′28; id. to Goslinga, 7, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Chauvelin to Fleury, 17 June ′28, A. E. Mem. et Doc. France 497, f. 230–32; Hop to Slingelandt, 1 July ′28, R. A Hl. 2982; Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 1, 4 July ′28, Fleury to Hop and Goslinga, 8 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 29 July ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
Newcastle to Stanhope, 3 June ′28, in Coxe, R. W. II, 629–30: Townshend to Chesterfield, 13 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 22 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Res. S. G. 9 July ′28, cf. Slingelandt to Goslihga, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Hop to Fagel, 29 July, 1 Aug. ′28, in Rousset, Recueil V, 252 et seq.; Mémoire de Pecquet sur l’affaire d’Ostfrise, A. E. Hl. 375 f. 73–5; Chauvelin to La Baune, 29 July, 26 Aug. ′28, ibid.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 15 July ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
Slingelandt to Hop, 13 July ′23, R. A. Legatie 84; Chesterfield to Townshend, 13 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Sinzendprff to Königsegg-Erps, 26 July ′28, Rousset, Recueil V, 260.
Hop to Slingelandt, 1 Aug. ′23, R. A. Hl. 2982; Hop to Fleury, 29 July, Fleury to Hop, 30 July ′28, in Rousset, Recueil V, 261–4. An error has crept into Rousset’s translation of Hop’s letter to Fagel of 1 Aug. 28 (loc. cit. 255 et seq.). On p. 256 he says: M. le Cardinal m’a d’abord repondu à ma lettre d’une manière qui confirme ce que la Comte de Sinzendorff avance. As appears from the Dutch original, confirme should be replaced by its opposite: renverse.
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 381–2:
ibid: 393–4, cf 375, 379.
ibid: Chapter VII. Concerning the conduct of the French ministers as to the Juliers and Bergh matter, Hop wrote to Slingelandt: “Ils veulent l’employer comme un motif qui animerait les quatre Electeurs à recourir aux liaisons avec eux dont la principale raison cesserait si on fixait le sort de ces états” (10 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982), and shortly afterwards: “Ce n’est pas tant la crainte des Impériaux qui empéche de parler dans le traité provisionel des affaires de Juliers et de Bergue que bien de ne pas ôter aux Electeurs l’aiguillon qui les fera aller plus vite pour s’adresser aux alliés d’Hanovre, à quoi ils seraient peut-être moins portés si cette affaire était reglée d’une facon qui les interesse si fort” (24 Sept. ′28, ibid). 1) Chesterfield to Townshend, 24 and 25 June ′28, Townshend to Chesterfield, 18 June ′28, R. O. Hl. 300. Rosenlehner (op. cit. 422) is mistaken in thinking the four Electors were invited to join the Hanover alliance.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974; id. to Townshend, 29 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 297; Chesterfield to Townshend, 20, 30 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Stanhope and Walople to Newcastle, 20 July ′28, R. O. Hl. 301
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 Aug. ′28, R. A. 2974.
id. to Hop, 21 July ′28, ibid.
cf Baudrillart, op cit. III 418, 430 et seq.
cf Slingelandt to Hop, 13, 31 Aug., 3, 17 Sept., 7 Oct. ′28, id. to Hop, Goslinga and Van Hoey, 19 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974, Legatie 84;
id. to Hop 5, 7, Aug. ′28, id to Goslinga, 7 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Hop to Slingelandt, 14 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982. 2) Hop to Slingelandt, 14 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
cf Slingelandt to Hop, 21 July ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Idées Générales sur la Formation d’un Traité, R. A. Hl. 2982, cf. Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 442.
Slingelandt to Hop, 5 Aug. ′28; cf. Chesterfield to Townshend, 3 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Hop to Slingelandt, 14 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
Slingelandt’s Remarks upon the Project, in Dutch, in Slingelandt to Hop, 21 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2974; in French, in Chesterfield to Townshend, 24 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301; Chesterfield to Townshend, 20 Aug. ′28, ibid.
Memorial on the Ostend Company, enclosed in Slingelandt to Hop, 21 Aug. ′28, R. A. Legatie 84.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 Aug. ′28.
cf. Slingelandt to Hop, 6 Nov., 1 Dec. ′28; idem to Goslinga, 21 May ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop 5 Aug. ′28; Chesterfield to Townshend, 3 Aug. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301. 2) Slingelandt to Hop, Goslinga and Van Hoey, 19 Sept. ′28.
cf. Rosenlehner, op. cit. 393.
Van Hoey to Slingelandt, 28 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2979.
Slingelandt to Hop, 9 Sept. ′28, R. A. Legatie 84.
Secr. Res. S. G. 9 Sept. ′28.
Hop, Goslinga & Van Hoey to Slingelandt, 15 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985; (enclosed with this is the “Projet de Traité”). A summary of this project except the separate article 4s to be found in Rosenlehner, op. cit. 425–6.
Slingelandt to Hop, Goslinga & Van Hoey, 19 Sept. ′28, Slingelaiidt to Goslinga, Dec. ′29; Chesterfield to Townshend, 21 Sept. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301. With reference to the renewal and extension of the Hanover Alliance, cf. Slingelandt to Hop, 5, 7, 21 Aug., 23 Oct. ′28, idem to Goslinga, 7 Aug. ′28.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 6, 13, 20 Aug. ′28; in the letter of the last mentioned date is enclosed “Observations on the Remarks upon the General Ideas for forming a Treaty”, which document can also be found R. A. Hl. 2985.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 17 Sept. ′28, R.O. Hl. 302; Slingelandt to Hop, 7 Oct. ′28.
Townshend to Slingelandt, 12 June ′28, R. A. Hl. 2994.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 3 Sept. ′28, R. O. Hl. 301.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 6 Sept. ′28 (draft), R. O. Hl. 301.
Slingelandt to Hop, 7 Oct. ′28 draft, R. A. Hl. 2974, original letter, R. A. Legatie 84.
Slingelandt to Hop, 21 Aug. ′28.
Hop to Slingelandt, 10 Sept. ′28; cf id. to id., 14 Aug. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 439.
Slingelandt to Hop, 7, 23 Oct. ′28; cf. Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 480–1, and Hop to Slingelandt, 19 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 444–6.
Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 24 Sept. ′28, with which is enclosed the “Remarques de l’Empereur”, R. A. Hl. 2935; Höfler, Der Congress von Soissons, Fontes Rerum Austriacarum, Vol. XXXII, 69. Huisman (op. cit. 441) is mistaken in ascribing the proposal concerning the aviso to the Cardinal.
of the references under note 3, p. 292.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 447–8; Townshend to Chesterfield, 24 Sept. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 36, 112, 126, 244, 289, 338–9.
Hop & Goslinga to Slingelandt, 24 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 448; Projet d’un traité entre l’Empereur, la France, la Grande Bretagne et la République à l’exclusion de l’Espagne, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Hop & Goslinga to Slingelandt, 26 Sept. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985; Syveton, op. cit. 263–4.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 15 Oct. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 452–3; Chauvelin to La Baune, 21 Oct. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375. 2) cf. Slingelandt to Hop, 3 Sept. ′28; La Baune to Chauvelin, 24 Oct. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 11 Oct. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Slingelandt to Hop, 7, 23 Oct., 6 Nov. ′28; with the first of these is enclosed Slingelandt’s “Observations sur les idées générales sur la formation d’un traité provisionel et sur les remarques de l’Empereur” together with his “Observations sur le projet pour la signature du traité provisionel sans l’Espagne”; Secr. Res. S. G. 23 Oct. ′28; Chesterfield to Townshend, 1, 15 Oct. ′28, R O. Hl. 302.
Wiarda, op. cit. VII, 412–22; Rousset, Recueil IV, 509, V. 279 et seq.; Res. S. G. 14 Oct. ′28; Siingelandt to Hop, 23 Oct. ′28.
“Observations sur le projet pour la signature du traité provisionel sans l’Espagne”, cf. note p. 298.
Slingelandt to Hop, 23 Oct. ′28.
cf. Syveton, op. cit. 264.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 480–1; Chauvelin to La Baune, 30 Dec. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375; Hop to Slingelandt, 10 Nov., 3 Dec. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
Chauvelin, Memorial of 10 Nov. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
Hop & Goslinga to Fagel, 10 Nov. ′28, to Slingelandt, 10, 11 Nov. ′28, R.A. Hl. 2985.
cf. Chauvelin to La Baune, 7 Oct. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
Hop & Goslinga to Slingelandt, 10 Nov. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Villars, Mémoires V, 155–7.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 5 Nov. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; King, Notes 68 et seq.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 23 Nov. ′23, R. O. Hl. 302.
Slingelandt, Memorial of 15 Nov. ′28, Slingelandt to Hop, 1 Dec. ′28; Secr. Res. S. G. 17 Nov. ′28.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 26 Nov. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 30 Dec. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375.
6 Jany ′29, draft, R. A. Hl. 2974.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 14, 21 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 31 Dec. ′28.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 23 Nov. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Res. S. G. 29 Nov., 2 Dec. ′28.
Chauvelin to Fénelon, 5, 8, 16 Dec. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375; Hop, Goslinga & Van Hoey to Slingelandt, 8 Dec. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 14 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; Slingelandt to Hop, 14, 17 Dec. ′28; Secr. Res. S. G. 8, 13 Dec. ′28.
Hop to Slingelandt, 23 Dec. 28, R. A. Hl. 2982; Hop, Goslinga & Van Hoey to Slingelandt, 23 Dec. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2985; Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; Chauvelin to Fénelon, 5, 23 Dec. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375; Secr. Res. S. G. 27 Dec. ′28.
Cf. Townshend to Chesterfield, 29 Nov., 3, 6, 10, Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; Secr. Res. S. G. 21 Dec. ′28.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 12, 29 Nov. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; Coxe R. W. II, 526–7.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 17 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 17 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 4 Jany ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 31 Dec.’28, R. A. Hl. 2974; Copie d’un rescript de S. A. S. E. Palatine au Resident Gansinot, 16 Dec. ′28, ibid.
Hop to Slingelandt, 7 Jany ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 4 Jany ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Slingelandt to Hop, 8 Oct. ′28, R. A; Legatie 84; Hop to Slingelandt; 15 Oct. ′28, cf. 10 Nov. ′28, R. A. Hl. 2982.
La Baune to Chauvelin, 4 Jany ′29, A. E. Hl. 376; cf. the Same to the Same, 24 Oct. ′28, ibid. 375.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 26 Sept., 7, 21 Oct., 4, 28 Nov. ′28, Á. E. Hl. 375.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 28 Nov. ′28, A. E. Hl. 375
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 445, 462.
Rosenlehner, op. cit. 420–22, 428–9.
ibid. 249, 442–9
Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Jany. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 31 Dec. ′28.
Newcastle to Poyntz, 14 J any. ′29, R. O. France 193.
Declaration enclosed with Townshend to Chesterfield, 10 Jany. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Jany., 15 Feby., 1 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303. That this communication was made without the knowledge of the Electors, we infer from Rosenlehner’s silence (op. cit.), and further from the circumstance that in the summer of this same year Bavaria and Cologn were ready to favour George II.’s views with regard to Mecklenburg (Jean Dureng, Mission de Chavigny, 89).
Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Jany., 15 Feby. 1 Mch. ′29, Townshend to Chesterfield, 28 Jany ′29. R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Jany. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303; Slingelandt to Goslinga, the Same to Hop, 15 Feby. ′29.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 4 Feby. ′29, Chesterfield to Townshend, 22 Feby. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 17 Feby., 13 Mch. ′29, A. E. Hl. 376.
Res. S. G. 24 Jany., 3 Mch. ′29, in this latter the declaration has been inserted; Rousset, Recueil V, 299.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 28 Jany. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303; La Baune to Chauvelin, 1 Feby. ′29, Chauvelin to La Baune, 3 Feby. ′29, A. E. Hl. 376; Res. S. G. 31 Jany. ′29; Secr. Res. S. G. 15 Feby. ′29; (Slingelandt’s) Remarques sur la réponse de l’Empereur aux instances faites de la part de la France dans l’affaire d’Ostfrise R. A. Hl. 2985.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 1 Feby. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Slingelandt to Hop, 15 Feby., 18 Mch. ′29; Secr. Res. S. G. 15 Feby., 3 Mch. ′29; Res. S. G. 3, 15, 19, 29 Mch. ′29; Chesterfield to Townshend, 4, 18, 25 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303; Chauvelin to La Baune, 17 Feby., 3, 13 Mch., 7 Apr. ′29, A. E. Hl. 376.
Syveton, op. cit. 260–1, 266–8.
Droysen, op. cit. II, 23–41, and particularly 48–9.
Townshend to Waldegrave, 3 Jany. ′29, Waldegrave to Townshend, 5 Feby. ′29, R. O. Germany 64.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 18 Jan. ′29, R. O: Hl. 303; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 15 Feby. ′29.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 18 Jan. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 15 Feby. ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 3 Mch. ′29; Chesterfield to Townshend, 11 Mch. 29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Slingelandt to Hop, 3 Mch. ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 15 Feby. ′29.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 1 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 15 Feby. ′29.
Ibid.
Slingelandt to Hop, 18 Mch. ′29.
Cobbett, Parliamentary History of England, VIII, 669.
It is an open question who took the first step as to this overture. Townshend later on contended that it was Kinsky: this was strongly denied, however, by the Court of Vienna. Most likely, Stanhope did so by order of the King and Queen, without the knowledge of Townshend, but not without the cognisance of Robert Walpole and Newcastle. Cf. Höfler, op. cit. XXXII No. 34, p. 302 et seq., and also pp. 26, 89, 117, 132–3.
Coxe, R. W. II, 638–40.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 21 Feby. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 11 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 15 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303. This letter and others exchanged between Chesterfield and Townshend in the second half of March have been inserted almost verbatim in King, Notes 71–84.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 30 Nov. ′28, in Bradshaw, op. cit. II, 687 et seq; Jorissen, op. cit. 32 et seq.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 29 Nov. 28, R. O. Hl. 302.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 14, 25 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302; the former also in Bradshaw, op. cit. II, 690 et seq.
Towshend to Chesterfield, 6, 17 Dee. ′28, 11 Febr. ′29, R. O. Hl. 302, 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 Feby., 15 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 15 Mch. ′29, 2 letters, R. O. Hl. 303. 2) Townshend to Chesterfield, 10 Mch. ′29, 2 letters, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 18, 25, 28 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Same to Same, 14 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 13 Jany., 3 Feby. ′29, A. E. Hl. 375, 376.
Slingelandt to Hop, 15 Feby. ′29; Hop to Slingelandt, 24 Feby. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983. 2) Hop to Slingelandt, 22 Mch. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 5 Apr. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Same to Same, 12 Apr. ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 4 Jany., 15 Mch., 12 Apr. ′29, R, O. Hl. 303, 304.
Same to Same, 21 Dec. ′28, 4 Jany. ′29; Townshend to Chesterfield, 17 Dec. ′28, R. O. Hl. 302–3.
Same to Same, 25 Mch. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303.
Res. S. G. 4 Dec. ′28; Secr. Res. S. G. 24 Jany. ′29; Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 497. 2) Chesterfield to Townshend, 5, 12 Apr. ′29, R. O. Hl. 303, 304.
Slingelandt to Hop, 14 Apr. ′29.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 29 Mch. 29. R. O. Hl. 303.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 499–503.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 497–9, 502–4; Chauvelin to La Baune, 28 Apr. ′29, A. E. Hl. 376; Drafts to the Plenipotentiaries, 7 Apr. ′29, R. O. France 193; Hop to Slingelandt, 18, 25, 30 Apr. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983; Hop, Goslinga and Hurgronje to Slingelandt, 30 Apr. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986. Baudrillart has presented the Cardinal’s letter to the Emperor of April 12th. as preceding receipt of that of La Paz (loc. cit. 499) which according to himself however (loc. cit. 502) took place on April nth..
Beer, Zur Geschichte der Politik Karl’s VI, Historische Zeitschrift 55 (1886) 53–4.
Hop, Goslinga and Hurgronje to Süngelandt, 30 Apr. ′29, Hop to Slingelandt, 8 May ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986, 2983.
Hop, Goslinga and Hurgronje to Slingelandt, 30 Apr. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986; Höfler op. cit. XXXII, 104, XXXVIII, 5; Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 512–4.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 29 Apr., 6, 13 May ′29, R. O. Hl. 304; Chesterfield to the Plenipotentiaries, 24 July ′29, in Coxe, R. W. II, 647 et seq; Slingelandt to Hop, 3 May ′29, the Same to Goslinga, 21 May ′29.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 3, 17 May, ′29, Townshend to Chesterfield, 29 Apr. ′29, R. O. Hl. 304; Slingelandt to Hop, 14 Apr. ′29 (enclosed with this, Willem van Citters to Slingelandt, 8 Apr. ′29), 13 May ′29, the Same to Goslinga, 21 May ′29.
Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 31 May, 15 June ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986; Huisman, op. cit. 450.
Slingelandt to Hop, 27 May, 27 June ′29, the Same to Goslinga, 28 May ′29, R. A. Legatie 84, Hl. 2974; Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 36, 39; Secr. Res. Hl. 4 June ′29.
Secr. Res. Hl. 4 June ′29.
Hop to Slingelandt, 13 Aug. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Slingelandt to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29; Chesterfield to Townshend, 11 June ′29, R. O. Hl. 304; the Same to the Plenipotentiaries, 24 July ′29, in Coxe, R. W. II, 647 et seq. 2) Newcastle to Stanhope, 22 May, 12 June ′29, in Coxe, R. W. II, 641 et seq.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 May, 5 July ′29; Chesterfield to Townshend or Newcastle, 27 May, 3, 4, 7 June ′29, R. O. Hl. 304; cf King, Notes, 90–1.
Slingelandt to Hop, 3 May, 11, 27 June ′29; Secr. Res. Hl. 15 June ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 17 June ′29.
Hop to Slingelandt, 21 June, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 518–21; Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 25, 36, 206, 234, XXXVIII, 5, 38–9, 69; Hop and Goslinga to Slingelandt, 31 May ′29; Hop. to Slingelandt, 31 May, 7 June ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986, 2983; Chauvelin to La Baune, 15 May ′29, A. E. Hl. 377; Drafts to the Plenipotentiaries, 5 May ′29, R. O. France 193.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 16 June, 7, 14, 24 July ′29, La Baune to Chauvelin, 21, 24 June, 15 July ′29, A. E. Hl. 377; Hop to Slingelandt, 16 June ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983; Slingelandt to Hop, 11 June ′29, the Same to Goslinga, 5 July ′29.
Newcastle to Stanhope, 22 May, 12 June ′29, in Coxe R. W. II, 641 et seq.; King, Notes 90–8; Townshend to Chesterfield, 1 July ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 1 July ′29, in Coxe R. W. II, 645–6.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 7 July ′29, R. O. Hl. 304 cf. the Same to the Same, 7 July ′29, private, in Coxe, loc. cit. 646.
Rescript to the Austrian Plenipotentiaries, 11 July ′29, Sinzendorff to St. Kinsky, 11 July ′29, in Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 35 et seq. 67 et seq.; Hop to Slingelandt, 22 July ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Relations of the Austrian Plenipotentiaries, 6, 27 July, 3, 22, 24 Aug. ′29, in Höfler, op. cit. XXXII; cf. ibid., 139; Coxe, loc. cit. 528–30; Slingelandt to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29.
Slingelandt to Goslinga 22, 23, 28 July ′29, the Same to Hop, 2, 22 Aug. ′29; Chesterfield to the Plenipotentiaries, 24 July ′29, in Coxe, loc. cit. 647, et seq.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 11, 21, 28 June ′29, Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 June ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Coxe, loc. cit. 649.
Slingelandt to Chesterfield, 17 Jany. ′30, B. M. Add. 32765.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 23, 28 July ′29, the same to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29.
Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 36, 39, 130, 138, 351–3; Slingelandt to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29.
Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 351–3, cf. 86; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 21 Aug. ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 2 Aug. ′29.
Res. S. G. 14 Apr., 6, 12, 16, 20 July ′29; Slingelandt to Hop, 12 Juli ′29, R. A. Legatie 84; Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 95–6; Chesterfield to Townshend, 5, 12 July ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Hop to Slingelandt, 29 July 29, R. A. Hl. 2983; Chauvelin to La Baune, 26 July, 7 Aug. ′29, La Baune to Chauvelin, 2 Aug. ′29, A. E. Hl. 377; Chesterfield to Townshend, 12 July, 1 Aug. ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 7, 19, 23, 25, 25 July, 2 Aug. ′29, R. O. Hl. 304–5; Newcastle to Stanhope, 17 July ′29, in Coxe, loc. cit. 650.
King, Notes 99–100; Chesterfield to Townshend, 19 Aug. ′29, R.O. Hl. 305.
At this time Elizabeth no longer, as some authors think, pressed the Emperor as to the marriage, but only on the question of the Spanish garrisons (Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 33; Arneth, op. cit. III, 238–9).
Rosenlehner, op. cit. Chap. VII, particularly pp. 460–1.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 14 June n. s. ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Dureng, Mission de Chavigny en Allemagne (Paris 1911), Chap. III.
Droysen, op. cit. II, 51–3.
Dureng, op. cit. 73–4, 82–92; Rosenlehner, op. cit. 463; Matthias, Die Mecklemburger Frage im 18 ten Jahrhundert (1885) was not accessible to me.
Dureng, op. cit. 86.
Droysen, op. cit. II, 55–74; Schilling, Der Zwist Preuszens und Hannovers 1729–30. (Halle, 1912).
Res. S. G. 29 Aug., 1, 3, 7, 8 Sept. ′29; Slingelandt to Hop, 6 Sept. ′29, R. A. Legatie 84; Townshend to Chesterfield, 23 Aug., 2 Sept. n. s. ′29, Chesterfield to Townshend or Newcastle, 30 Aug., 2, 3, 6, 9 Sept. ′29, Holzendorff to Tilson, 30 Aug., 3 Sept. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305.
Slingelandt to Hop, 13 Sept. ′29.
Droysen, op. cit. II, 62–3; Schilling, op. cit. 78; Dureng, op. cit. 86, 88–9.
Hop to Slingelandt, 15 Sept. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Slingelandt tot Goslinga, 8 Sept. ′29.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 17 May ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Slingelandt to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29; cf. Chesterfield to Townshend, 25 July ′29, R. O. Hl. 304.
Townshend to Chesterfield, 21 Aug, ′29, Chesterfield to Townshend, 26 Aug. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305; King, Notes 99.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 532: Villars Mémoires V. 190 et seq.
Lavisse, Histoire de France 8, II, 118–9; Bourgeois, Manuel, I, 479–480; Coxe, H. W. 167–9; idem, Memoirs of the Kings of Spain (London, 1813) II, 425; King, Notes, 109–10; Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 530 (3rd footnote), 535; Chauvelin to La Baune, 21 Aug., 11 Sept. ′29, A. E. Hl. 377, 378.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 531, 2nd footnote, 535, 537 et seq.; Coxe R. W. II, 651, 653; Chesterfield to Townshend, 6 Sept. ′29, very secret, R. O. Hl. 305; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 8 Sept. ′29.
Plenipotentiaries to Slingelandt, 7 May, 29 July ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986; Chauvelin to La Baune, 26 July ′29, A. E. Hl. 377.
Hop to Slingelandt, 19 Aug., 8 Sept., 18 Oct. 29, R. A. Hl. 2983; Baudrillart, op cit. HI, 533.
Chauvelin to La Baune, 26 July ′29, A. E. Hl. 377.
Hop to Slingelandt, 19 Aug., 8, 15 Sept., 18 Oct., 21 Nov. ′29 R. A. Hl. 2983. 2) Plenipotentiaries to Slingelandt, 8 Sept. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986.
Slingelandt to Hop, 8, 13 Sept. ′29; Chesterfield to Newcastle, 13 Sept. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305. 2) Slingelandt to Goslinga, 13 Sept. ′29.
The Same to the Same, 21 Aug. ′29; cf. the Same to the Same, 5 July ′29, and the Same to Hop, 2 Aug. ′29 ib.
Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 99, 143–6, 251.
Dureng, op. cit. 96.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 19 Aug. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305; Chauvelin to La Baune, 28 Aug. ′29, A. E. Hl. 377; Res. S. G. 19 Sept. ′29.
Rescript 31 Aug. ′29, Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 117 et seq; Précis des propositions faites verbalement par. M. M. de Kinsky et Fonseca de la part de l’Empereur, ib. 350, and Secr. Res. Hl. 12 Oct. ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 27 Sept., 25 Oct. ′29.
Rescripts 11 July, 31 Aug. ′29, in Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 35 et seq., 117 et seq.
Hop to Slingelandt, 15 Sept. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
“Pensées impartiales et pacifiques que L’Empereur demande aux Alliés de Hanovre comme une condition sine qua non de la réconciliation générale, ou de l’accommodement, auquel les principales puissances de l’Europe travaillent au Congrès de Soissons”, Jorissen, op. cit. 273–8.
Slingelandt to Goslinga, 11 Oct. ′29; Memorial quoted in preceding reference.
Réponse concertée par les Ministres de France, d’Angleterre et des Etats-Généraux à faire verbalement à M. M. de Kinsky et Fonseca sur les propositions faites de la part de l’Empereur, in Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 350–1, and Secr. Res. Hl. 12 Oct. ′29.
Hop to Slingelandt, 5 Oct. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983; Slingelandt to Goslinga, 11 Oct. ′29; H. Walpole to Poyntz, 4 Nov. ′29, Coxe, R. W. II, 659 et seq.
Hop to Slingelandt, 5 Oct. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
That Goslinga moved this idea is nowhere expressly reported but it is most probable, cf Slingelandt to Goslinga, n, 25 Oct. ′29; Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 373; Jorissen op. cit. 282–3.
These observations are enclosed in Townshend to Chesterfield, 10 Oct. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305, and R. A. Hl. 2994.
Hop to Slingelandt, 18 Oct. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983; H. Walpole to Poyntz, 4 Nov. ′29, loc. cit.
We have taken the liberty of representing the opinion of H. Walpole as that of R. Walpole cum suis.
Höffer, op. cit. XXXII, 222.
King, Notes 101–5; Dureng, op. cit. 83–96; Coxe, R. W. I, 336; H. Walpole to Poyntz, 4 Nov. ′29, ib. II, 659 et seq.; Townshend to Chesterfield, 3, 7 Oct. ′29, Chesterfield to Townshend 7, 21, 25 Oct. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305.
Chesterfield to Townshend, 7 Oct. ′29, R. O. Hl. 305.
Slmgelandt to Hop, 22 Aug. ′29. 2) The Same to Goslinga, 11 Oct. ′29.
The Same to the Same, 8, 13 Sept., 25 Oct. ′29.
The Same to Chesterfield, 17 Nov. ′29.
The Same to Goslinga, 11 Oct. ′29.
The Same to Goslinga, 11 Oct. ′29; Secr. Res. S. G. 14 Oct. ′29.
Chesterfield to Harrington, 14 Feby. ′31, Hist. MSS. Comm. Rep. X App. I, 247. 3) Chesterfield to Slingelandt, 28 Oct. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2994; Slingelandt to Goslinga, the Same to Hop. 25 Oct. ′29.
Slingelandt to Hop, 25 Oct. ′29.
“Suite des pensées impartiales et pacifiques sur la garantie que l’Empereur a demandée aux Alliés de Hanovre”, 25 Oct. ′29, in Jorissen, op. cit. 279–85.
Hop to Slingelandt, 15 June, 7 Dec. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
The Same to the Same, 28 Oct. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Plenipotentiaries to Slingelandt, 7 Nov. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2986; Secr. Res. S. G. 26 Nov. ′29.
Secr. Res. Hl. 16 Nov. ′29.
Rescript 8 Oct. ′29, in Höfler, op. cit. XXXII, 241 et seq.; Smzendorff to Kinsky, 12 Oct. ′29, ib. 253.
Höfler, loc. cit. 324 et seq.; Hop to Slmgelandt, 4 Nov. ′29, R. A. Hl. 2983.
Baudrillart, op. cit. III, 540 et seq.; Secr. Res. Hl. VIII, 190 et seq.
Slingelandt to Hop, 13 Sept. ′29.
Cf. the Same to the Same, 17 June ′29, the Same to Goslinga, 21 Aug. ′29.
Secr. Res. S. G. 22, 25 Oct., 11 Nov. ′29; Van der Meer to Fagei, 23 Nov. ′29, in Secr. Res. Hl. VIII, 184–6; ib. 190 et seq.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1915 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goslinga, A. (1915). The Congress of Soissons up till the Treaty of Seville: The Separating of Spain from the Emperor. March 1728–November 1729. In: Slingelandt’s Efforts Towards European Peace. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0853-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0853-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0315-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0853-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive