Skip to main content

Various Theories of Reality in Physics

  • Chapter
Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity

Abstract

Part II on the ontology of quantum mechanics follows Part I both logically and, in our case, chronologically. It follows logically since it is our aim to disentangle the concepts of reality and being implicit in various accounts of scientific knowing; it follows chronologically since in Heisenberg’s case his explicit ontology was not formulated before 1950, that is to say, not until twenty-five years after the publication of quantum mechanics1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Einstein, Essays in Science (New York: Philos. Libr., 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See the interesting discussion of Eddington and others by E. C. Mascall in Christian Theology and Natural Science (London: Longmans, 1956), chap. III.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A very penetrating critique of instrumentalism from inside the school of logical empiricism has been made by the group associated with the Minnesota Centre for the Philosophy of Science, as for example, Grover Maxwell’s “The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III, ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minn., 1962), pp. 3–27; P. K. Feyerabend, “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism”, ibid., pp. 28-97; also by the same author, “An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience”, Proc. Aristot. Soc., lviii (1958), pp. 144-170. We have already criticised the neglect of certain distinctions which we believe to be fundamental for an adequate realistic theory of science, e. g., properties-for-us vs. properties-for-things, observable symbol vs. property symbolised etc. Cf. supra, chap. iv.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. by J. B. Baillie (London: Allen and Unwin, 1961), p. 102 in Preface.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heelan, P.A. (1965). Various Theories of Reality in Physics. In: Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0831-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0831-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0300-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0831-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics