Skip to main content
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

A transcendental analysis of the act of knowing asks the question as to what the structures of being are which make knowing possible. We must develop an ontology which is critically aware of the functioning of the transcendental imagination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rahner, Spirit in the World, p. 59: “This need to question is the only point of departure for the metaphysical question that has its foundation in itself.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plato, Meno (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1949), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf., Coreth, Metaphysics, pp. 53–64. However, I will not go as far as Coreth and call this preknowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See J. P. Sartre, The Transcendence of the Ego (New York: Noonday Press, x957) especially pp. 38–39, for a development of the notion of intentionality.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin Heidegger, What is Called Thinking (New York: Harper and Row, 1968), P. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 34; Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, pp. 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin Heidegger, Existence and Being (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1949), p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alfred North Whitehead, Modes of Thought (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1958), p. VII.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin Heidegger, Holzwege (Frankfurt am Main, 1963), p. 7; What I have said parallels Heidegger’s discussion of the reciprocal relationship of the artist with his work.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger, What is Called Thinking, especially pp. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin Heidegger, What Is Philosophy (New Haven, Conn.: College and University Press, 1956), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heidegger, What is Called Thinking, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heidegger, An Introduction to Metaphysics, p. II; What is Called Thinking, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heidegger, An Introduction to Metaphysics, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heidegger, What Is Philosophy, pp. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, pp. 134, 162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winquist, C.E. (1972). Transcendental Ontology. In: The Transcendental Imagination: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9558-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9558-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8717-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9558-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics