Skip to main content

Abstract

The pre-adviser is grateful for the view of someone who knows all about the practice of applied science and he entirely understands Dr Dippel’s objections against the pre-advice. Nevertheless he believes that in the pre-advice especially the responsibility had to be stressed, which belongs to the student of science in that capacity, although at the same time explicitly must be stated that his responsibility was thereby not by any means exhausted. Responsibility that goes further than this the scientist shares with his fellow-creatures as has been repeatedly remarked in the pre-advice. This does not make the responsibility less important but it does make it less specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1955 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagenvoort, H., Langemeijer, G.E., Samkalden, I. (1955). Summary of Prof. van Melsen’s Answer to Dr Dippel. In: Freedom and Restriction in Science and its Aspects in Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8396-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9099-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics