Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fertility and Sterility ((SFST,volume 4))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the usefulness of blocking ovulation before and after tubal plastic surgery. J. Henry-Suchetl, then Buttram2, have described the use of such a pre- and postoperative treatment for two reasons:

  1. (1)

    The surgical act is facilitated: ovariolysis can be done in better conditions, in particular when adhesions are dense and extensive. Ovaries become small and hard with a reduced tendency to bleed.

  2. (2)

    It prevents postoperative adhesion of the tube to a recent corpus luteum and reduces formation after ovarian surgery of new adhesions. This has been confirmed by a second-look laparoscopy on 8 days postoperatively and has been published earlier3. Oestroprogestagens or norethisterone could reach an equivalent result but the thromboembolic risk is unacceptable in surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Henry-Suchet, J. and Loffredo, V. (1981). Compared results between two series of terminal tuboplasties. In GAM Lausanne. p. 521. Revue médicale de la Suisse Romande.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buttram, V. C., Belue, J. B. and Reiter, R. (1982). Interim report of a study of danazol for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril., 37, 478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henry-Suchet, J. and Loffredo, V. (1982). Techniques d’évaluation des résultats de la microchirurgie tubaire. In Cornier, E. (ed.) Techniques Microchirurgicales de la Stérilité. p. 169. ( Paris: Masson )

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chimbira, T.H., Cope, E., Anderson, B. M. and Bolton, F. G. (1979). The effect of danazol on menorrhagia, coagulation mechanism, haematological indices and body weight. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 86, 46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rakoff, A. E. (1976). Side effects of danazol therapy. In Greenblatt, R. B. (eds.) Recent Advances in Endometriosis. pp. 108–15. ( Princeton, N.J.: Excerpta Medica )

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tesquier, L., Henry-Suchet, J., Loysel, T., Robert, Y., Loffredo, V. (1984). Danazol as an ovulation inhibitor prior to tubal surgery. In: Harrison, R.F., Bonnar, J., Thompson, W. (eds) Diagnosis and Management of Tubo-Uterine Factors in Infertility. Studies in Fertility and Sterility, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7621-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7621-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7623-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7621-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics