Skip to main content

Applicability of American Management

  • Chapter
Managerialism for Economic Development

Part of the book series: Studies in Social Life ((SOSL,volume 11))

Abstract

The Indian Government as well as the business community has realized the importance of advanced management know-how in our economic and industrial efforts. The awareness and actions taken so far are reflected by several factors discussed in Chapter 3.

The main ideas of this chapter were originally presented by A. R. Negandhi at the Academy of Management, Western 1965 meetings and subsequently published in Academy of Management Journal, Dec. 1965. Permission of the Journal is acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. John R. P. French, J. Israel, et al., “An Experiment on Participation in a Norwegian Factory,” Human Relations, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–19; F. Harbison and E. Burgess, “Modern Management in Western Europe,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 60, no. 1, July 1954; H. Hartman, Authority and Organization in German Management (Princeton University Press, 1959); C. Kerr, J. T. Dunlop, et al., Industrialism and Industrial Man (Harvard University Press, 1960); W. R. Dill, “The Impact of Environment on Organizational Development,” in S. Mailuk and E. Van Ness (eds.), Readings in Administrative Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1961); W. F. Whyte, “Framework for the Analysis of Industrial Relations: Two Views,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 3, no. 3, April, 1950; Richard F. Gonzalez and Claude McMillan, Jr., “The Universality of American Management Philosophy,” Journal of the Acadamy of Management, vol. 4, no. 1, April 1961, pp. 33–41; Winston Oberg, “Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Management Principles,” Journal of the Academy of Management, vol. 6, no. 2, June 1963, pp. 129–143; and Richard Farmer and Barry Richman, “A Model for Research in Comparative Management,” California Management Review, Winter 1964, pp. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The concepts, like management philosophy, management theory, and management practices, have not been defined clearly by many authors in management literature. Gonzalez and McMillan, in this article, are using the concepts interchangeably. For such confusion in usage of these concepts, also see John F. Mee, Management Thought in a Dynamic Economy (New York: New York University Press, 1963), pp. 73–74, where the author is using management theory and management philosophy interchangeably. In this model, however, the concept of management philosophy is being defined differently from these author’s definitions.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez and McMillan, op. cit., p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oberg, op. cit., pp. 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farmer and Richman, op. cit., p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez and McMillan, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harbison and Myers, op. cit., p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., particularly, see a case study of Sears, Roebuck de Mexico, S.A., (New York: National Planning Association, May 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subbiah Kannappan and Eugene W. Burgess, Aluminium Limited in India (New York: National Planning Association, 1961), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. R. Dill, “Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy,” in J. D. Thompson et al. (eds.) Comparative Studies in Administration (Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 1959), p. 131. * For definition and explanation of this concept, please see p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fanner and Richman, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamala Chowdhry and A. K. Pal, “Production Planning and Organization Morale,” reprinted in Albert H. Rubenstein and C. J. Haberstroh, Some Theories of Organization (The Dorsey Press, Inc., and Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1960) pp. 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harold Koontz (ed.), Toward a Unified Theory of Management (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1964), especially pp. 1–17 and 235–265.

    Google Scholar 

  14. This list of elements is reproduced from Richard N. Farmer and Barry M. Richman, Comparative Management and Economic Progress. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1965, pp. 20–21. By courtesy of the publisher.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prasad, S.B., Negandhi, A.R. (1968). Applicability of American Management. In: Managerialism for Economic Development. Studies in Social Life, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7499-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7499-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7501-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7499-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics