Skip to main content

Variables Altering the Mechanical Characteristics of Fixator Frames

  • Chapter
Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research

Part of the book series: Developments in Biomechanics ((DEBI,volume 2))

Abstract

External fixators allow the manipulation and immobilization of fractures through pins which have been percutaneously inserted into each main bony fragment and are externally connected by one or more longitudinal bars. Recognized as an attractive concept in the middle of the 19th century, a high rate of complications such as pin tract osteomyelitis, loss of reduction, and component failures have prevented for many decades the regular use of these devices. Since the introduction of more stable bilateral frames (transfixion pins are connected over two or more medial and lateral connecting rods) over a decade ago (1), external fixation has become the preferred method for the immobilization of severe open diaphyseal fractures and osseous infections. While bilateral frames have remained popular, their safety, particularly in the lower leg where most fixators are applied, is being increasingly questioned (2,5). Multiple transfixion pins have caused anterior compartment syndromes, lacerations of the anterior tibial vessels, injuries to the saphenous and superficial peroneal nerves, and frequently lead to at least partial stiffness of the ankle and subtalar joints (5,6). It also has become obvious that these frames are weakest in the sagittal plane where clinically the largest bending moments apply (8). A search for safer fixator configuration has recently led to the rediscovery of one and two-plane unilateral configurations which occupy a cross-sectional sector of less than 90 degrees and therefore can be applied to the anteromedial aspect of the leg without jeopardizing vital neurovascular structures and musculotendinous units (2). While clinically attractive, the limited rigidity of these configurations has been held responsible for the many complications that affected the use of external fixators in the past (1,7,9).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adrey J: Le fixateur externe d’Hoffmann couple en cadre. Gead, Paris, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behrens F, Comfort TH, Searls K, Denis F, Young JT: Unilateral external fixation for severe open tibial fractures: Preliminary report of a prospective study. Clin. Orthop. 178:111–120, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boltze WH, Fernandez DL: The external fixator (tubular system). AO Bulletin, Bern, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bresler B, Frankel JP: The forces and moments in the leg during level walking. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs. 72:27–36, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emerson RH, Grabias SL: A retrospective analysis of severe diaphyseal tibial fractures treated with external fixation. Orthopedics 6:43–49, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green S: Complications of External Skeletal Fixation. C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1981], p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hierholzer G, et al: External fixator: Classification and indications. Arch. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. 92:175, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCoy MT, Briggs BT, Chao EY: A comparative study of external skeletal fixators based on bone fracture stiffness. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 5:173, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vidal J, et al: Traitement des fractures ouvertes de jambe par le fixateur externe en double cadre. Rev. Chir. Orthop. 62:433, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zarrugh MY: Kinematic prediction of intersegment loads and power at the joints of the leg in walking. J. Biomechanics 14:713–725, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Behrens, F., Johnson, W.D. (1985). Variables Altering the Mechanical Characteristics of Fixator Frames. In: Perren, S.M., Schneider, E. (eds) Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research. Developments in Biomechanics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7432-9_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7432-9_77

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7434-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7432-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics