Skip to main content

Deliveries after cesarean birth in two Asian university hospitals

  • Chapter
Childbirth in Developing Countries

Abstract

One of the significant recommendations made by the task force of the consensus conference on cesarean birth, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for curbing the ever-increasing cesarean birthrate in the United States was to substitute routine elective repeat cesarean delivery with a trial of labor and subsequent vaginal delivery in adequately selected cases6. Because more than 98% of US women with a previous cesarean delivery undergo a repeat cesarean for subsequent pregnancies6, and the number of women delivered vaginally after previous cesarean birth in a hospital is generally too small for comparison with the former1, we used data from two Asian teaching hospitals to assess the benefits and risks associated with this recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bottom, S. E., Rosen, M. G. and Sokol, R. J. (1980). The increase in cesarean birth rate. N. Engl. J. Med, 302, 559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chi, I-c., Agoestina, T. and Harbin, J. (1981). Maternal mortality at twelve teaching hospitals in Indonesia - an epidemiologic analysis. Int. J. Gynaecol Obstet, 19, 259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas, R. G., Birnbaum, S. J. and MacDonald, F. A. (1963). Pregnancy and labor following cesarean section. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 86, 961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McGarry, J. A. (1969). The management of patients previously delivered by ‘esarean section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw, 76, 137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merrill, B. S. and Gibbs, C. E. (1978). Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean sections. Obstet. Gynecol, 52, 50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen, M. G. (1981). NIH consensus development task force statement on cesarean childbirth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 139, 902

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chi, I., Saifuddin, A.B., Gunatilake, D.E., Wallace, S.L. (1983). Deliveries after cesarean birth in two Asian university hospitals. In: Potts, M., Janowitz, B., Fortney, J.A. (eds) Childbirth in Developing Countries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7265-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7265-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7267-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7265-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics