Spin Changes in Iron Complexes

  • H. G. Drickamer
  • C. W. Frank
Part of the Studies in Chemical Physics book series (SCP)


As discussed in Chapter 2, the normal ground state of a free ion is the one of maximum multiplicity (Hund’s First Rule). This configuration minimizes the interelectronic repulsion. It was also shown there that a ligand field of octahedral symmetry partially removes the degeneracy, giving a lower lying triplet of π(t2g) symmetry and a higher energy doublet of σ(eg) symmetry. We showed in Chapter 6 that for high spin complexes the ligand field increases significantly with pressure, and that the interelectronic repulsion (Racah) parameters decrease. Thus, on the one hand, with pressure it takes an increasing amount of potential energy to occupy all the orbitals; on the other hand, the decreasing Racah parameters decrease the spin pairing energy. Both of these factors increase the probability of a high spin to low spin conversion. (The increase in field is probably the major effect.) Since Griffith [1] has shown that an intermediate spin configuration is never the most stable in octahedral symmetry, we need only deal with high and low spin states at this point.


High Spin Isomer Shift Quadrupole Splitting Iron Complex Ligand Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. S. Griffith, The Theory of Transition Metal Ions, Cambridge University Press, London (1964).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. W. Vaughan and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 47 468 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. B. Bargeron, M. Avinor and Drickamer, Inorganic Chem., 10 1338 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. E. Erickson in Mössbauer Effect and Its Application in Chemistry, edited by R. F. Gould, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. C. Fisher and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 54 4825 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. B. Bargeron and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 55 3471 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Day and N. Sanders, J. Chem. Soc., (A) 1530 (1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. B. Weiser, W. O. Milligan and J. B. Bates, J. Phys. Chem., 46 99 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. K. Van Bever, Rec. Trau. Chim., 57 1259 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. C. Wilson. Struct. Rept. 9 209 (1942–44);Google Scholar
  11. A. J. C. Wilson. Struct. Rept. 11 421 (1947–48).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    S. C. Fung and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 51 4353 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    P. J. Wang, M. S. Thesis, University of Illinois (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    D. D. Perrin, Organic Complexing Reagents, Chapter 4, p. 56, Interscience, New York (1964).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    D. C. Grenoble and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 55 1624 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© H. G. Drickamer and C. W. Frank 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. G. Drickamer
    • 1
  • C. W. Frank
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical Sciences and Materials Research LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations