Abstract
The National Wetlands Inventory of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared large scale (1:24,000) wetland maps for nearly all of the Southern Appalachian Region. Traditional and digital cartographic products are available from the Earth Science Information Centers of the United States Geological Survey and from State-run distribution outlets. Most of the materials prepared by the NWI within the region were cooperatively funded by the States and other Federal Agencies.
NWI maps describe wetlands in terms of the life form of the dominant vegetation, substrata where vegetation is sparse or lacking, water chemistry, relative duration of inundation or saturation, and special modifiers. The maps display wetland polygons as small as 0.5 hectares in size and linear wetlands as narrow as 8 meters, showing the size, type of wetland, and relative position of the wetland on the landscape. The wetland inventory process is principally a remote sensing task, relying on the interpretation of high altitude color infrared aerial photography, supported with ground truth data and collateral information. The procedure has limitations related to scale, quality, and timing of the aerial photography; experience and training of the photo interpreters; and the wetland types which are to be classified and delineated. Since wetland maps provide a static depiction of a dynamic resource, the NWI conducts periodic wetland status and trends studies to evaluate wetland change in areal extent and the reasons for the change. Although trend surveys are routinely conducted nationally and selectively for regional and local areas, no study to specifically address the wetlands of the Southern Appalachian Region has been developed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cowardin, L.M. Carter, V. Golet, F.C., and LaRoe, E.T. 1979.: Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-79/31, pp. 103.
Crowley, S. O’Brien, C., and Shea, S.: 1988. Results of the Wetland Study and the 1988 Draft Wetland Rules. Report by the Agency of Natural Resources Divisions of Water Quality, Waterbury, Vermont, pp. 33.
Dahl, T.E. and Johnson, C.E.: 1991. Wetlands Status and Trends in the Conterminous United States. Mid-1970’s to Mid-1980’s. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Project, Washington, D.C. pp. 28.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: 1992. Application of Satellite Data for Mapping and Monitoring Wetlands - Fact Finding Report: Technical Report 1. Wetlands Subcommittee, FGDC. Washington, D.C. pp. 32 plus Appendices.
Frayer, W.E. and Hefner, J.M.: 1991. Florida Wetlands: Status and Trends. 1970’s to 1980’s. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Project, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 31.
Frayer, W.E. Monahan, T.J. Bowden, D.C. and Graybill, F.A.: 1983. Status and Trends of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats in the Conterminous United States. 1950’s to 1970’s. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, pp. 32.
Hefner, J.M.: 1986. Wetlands of Florida, 1950’s to 1970’s. In: Estevez, E.D., Miller, J.; Morris, J.; Hamman, R. eds., Proceedings. Conference on Managing Cumulative Effects in Florida Wetlands: 1985 October 17–19; Sarasota, FL. New College Environmental Studies Prog. Publ. No. 37. Madison, WI: Omnipress. pp 23–31.
Hefner, J.M. and Brown, J.D.: 1984. Wetland trends in the Southeastern United States. Wetlands 4: 1–11.
Reed, P.B. Jr.: 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: National Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Project, Washington, D.C., Biological Report 88 (24). pp. 244.
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S.: 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina pp. 325.
Shaw, S.P. and Fredine, C.G.: 1956. Wetlands of the United States. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. pp. 67.
Swartwout, D.J. MacConnell, W.P. and Finn, J.T.: 1981. An Evaluation of the National Wetlands Inventory in Massachusetts. In: Proc. In-Place Resource Inventories Workshop. 9–14 August 1981, University of Maine, Orono. pp. 685–691.
Tiner, R. W. Jr.: 1984. Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington D.C. pp. 59.
Tiner, R.T. Jr.: 1990. Use of High-Altitude Aerial Photography for Inventorying Forested Wetlands in the United States. For. Ecol. and Management, Vol. 33 /34, pp. 593–604.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: 1990. Photointerpretation Conventions for the National Wetlands Inventory. National Wetlands Inventory Project, St. Petersburg, Florida. Unpublished, pp. 45.
U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1991. Hvdric Soils of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Washington. D.C. (not paginated).
Wilen, B.O. and Pywell, H.R.: 1992. Remote Sensing the Nation’s Wetlands: The National Wetlands Inventory. In: Greer, J.D. editor. Proceedings of the Fourth Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference. 1992 April 6–11; Orlando, Florida, pp. 6–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hefner, J.M., Storrs, C.G. (1994). Classification and Inventory of Wetlands in the Southern Appalachian Region. In: Trettin, C.C., Aust, W.M., Wisniewski, J. (eds) Wetlands of the Interior Southeastern United States. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6579-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6579-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6581-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6579-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive