Skip to main content

Flux and Cleaning

  • Chapter
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The selection of flux and cleaning processes plays a critical role in the manufacturing yield and product reliability of electronic assemblies. The subjects of flux and cleaning are interrelated, one cannot be discussed without the other. The function of flux is to remove oxides and other nonmetallic impurities from the soldering surfaces and prepare a clean surface for joining. After soldering, the flux residues or contaminants must be removed by cleaning. The type of contaminant is determined primarily by the type of flux used, but halides, oxides, and various other contaminants are introduced during storage and handling, as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Musselman, R.P., and Yarbrough, T.W., “The fluid dynamics of cleaning under surface mounted P. W. As and hybrids.” Proceedings of NEPCON West, February 1986, pp. 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin, W. “An inside look at flux formulations.” EPandP, May 1987, pp. 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aspandiar, R., Prasad, P. D., and Kreider, C. “The impact of an organic acid wave solder flux on the cleanliness of surface mount assemblies.” NEPCON Proceedings, February 1987, pp. 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wherry, R. W. “Injections of reagent stimulate yield of rosin in pine stumps.” Adhesive Age, September 1981, pp. 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romenesko, B. M. Cleaning, Surface Mount Technology. International Society for Hybird Microelectronics Technical Monograph Series 6984–002, 1984, Reston, Va, pp. 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manko, H. M. Soldering Handbook for Printed Circuits and Surface Mounting. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986, pp. 232 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellenberger, C. K. “TI tests find best cleaner, Part II,” Circuits Manufacturing, December 1986, pp. 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sanger, D., and Johnson, K., A Study of Solvent and Aqueous Cleaning of Fluxes: Naval Weapon Center, China Lake, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, B. N. Cleaning and Contamination of Electronics Components and Assemblies. Ayr, Scotland: Electrochemical Publications, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elliot, D. A. “Cleaning electronic assemblies.” NEPCON Pro- ceedings, February 1988, pp 510–518.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerard, D. R. “Eight different cycles for cleaning surface mount assemblies.” Circuits Manufacturing, March 1987, pp. 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lermond, D. S. “SMT flux cleaning.” Circuits Manufacturing, September 1987, pp. 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ANSI/IPC-AC-62. Post Solder Aqueous Cleaning Handbook. IPC, Lincolnwood, IL. Approved Feb. 5, 1987, as an American National Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IPC-CC-830. Qualification and Performance of Electrical Insulating Compounds for Printed Board Assemblies.“ IPC Standard, Lincolnwood, IL, January 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ANSI/IPC-SM-840A. Qualification and Performance of Permanent Polymer Coating (Solder Mask) for Printed Boards. IPC Standard, Lincolnwood, IL, July 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IPC-ML-950B. Performance Specification for Multilayer Printed Wiring Boards. IPC Standard, Lincolnwood, IL, December 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. IPC-SF-818. General Requirements for Electronic Soldering Fluxes IPC Standard, Lincolnwood, IL, August 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tautscher, C. J. “Measuring cleanliness of printed wiring: what really counts.” Proceedings of NEPCON West, March 1983, pp. 556–564.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wargotz, W. B. “Physical design for irrigability in aggressive flux assembly of printed wiring.” Proceedings of NEPCON East, June 1985, pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IPC-TM-2.6.3. Moisture and Insulation Resistance, Rigid, Rigid/ Flex and Flex Printed Wiring Boards. IPC Test Method, Lincolnwood, IL, February 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klein Wassink R. J., Soldering in Electronics. Ayr, Scotland: Electrochemical Publications, 1984, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aspandiar, R. F., Piyarali, A., and Prasad, P. “Is OA OK?” Circuits Manufacturing, April 1986, pp. 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tuck, J. Round Table on cleaning-renewed interest in water cleaning, Circuits Manufacturing, August 1988, pp. 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bredfeldt, K. “How well can we qualify cleanliness for surface mount assemblies?” NEPCON Proceedings, February 1987, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Van Nostrand Reinhold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prasad, R.P. (1989). Flux and Cleaning. In: Surface Mount Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6532-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6532-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6534-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics