Abstract
The problem of the legitimation of science may have a different significance in one time and place than in another. Thus, at the dawn of modern science, when science became increasingly the intellectual competitor to religion, both science and religion, i.e. the spokesmen of both, each questioned the legitimacy of the other system. Once science won the hegemony, the problem arose afresh, but on a smaller scale and within science, every time a controversy raged. Soon science threatened the existing political order, and so representatives of the Establishment and of science questioned the legitimacy of each other’s framework, and thus the whole system of science could be questioned afresh. But this did not happen: The representative of the Establishment only questioned the possibility of a social and political science — of a science of man. In the nineteenth century within the scientific community some saw the possibility of the science of man and remained radicalists, others raised doubts about the very possibility of the science of man, thereby giving legitimation to the Reaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (1981). The Legitimation of Science. In: Science and Society. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6458-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6456-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive