Abstract
Trevor-Roper’s introduction to Miss Purver’s work1 sums up the book adequately. There are two stories about the antecedents of the foundation of the Royal Society of London, overlapping yet different. Sprat’s History of the Royal Society of 1667 declares the Oxford group to be its antecedent, whereas most other writers assume the London group to be the one. The prejudice against Sprat, namely that he was himself prejudiced in favour of Oxford, is dispelled by showing that his History was the semi-official one. The question, however, is ideological. The Royal Society was Baconian. So were both the Oxford and the London groups. But whereas the London group held vulgar Baconianism, the Oxford group and its successor the Royal Society were purist Baconian. Thus, the true predecessor is the Oxford group as Sprat has claimed, not the London group as his successors have claimed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Margery Purver, The Royal Society: Concept and Creation, with an introduction by H. R. Trevor-Roper; Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1967, pp. xvii + 239.
Since this was first published, a detailed study has appeared on the Baconian radicalist critique and the defense of Oxford by Wilkins and Ward: Charles Webster, ‘William Dell and the Idea of University’, in M. Teich and R. Young (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science: Essays in Honor of Joseph Needham, Heinemann, London, 1973, pp. 110–126, esp. 125. The defense appears anti-Baconian.
Further detail about Johann Valentin Andreae ean be found in a most interesting review by Dashiell Hammett of Arthur Edward Waite’s book on the Rosicrucians reprinted in his ‘Tulip’, an autobiographie fragment, published posthumously in his The Continental Operator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (1981). The Origins of the Royal Society. In: Science and Society. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6458-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6456-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive