Abstract
These two case histories may be read as an apologia for the sometimes self-indulgent practising of autecological investigation. Studies of single species, unless carried out in a rigorously comparative frame of reference, may not repay the effort expended. In these two cases the species selected are representative of wider themes, and each study ought to stimulate further work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 David W. Jeffrey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeffrey, D.W. (1987). The autecology of two contrasting species. In: Soil~Plant Relationships. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6076-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6076-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7099-1464-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6076-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive