Skip to main content

The promise of sonographic contrast agents in the kidney

  • Chapter
Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement

Abstract

The ability of current ultrasound scanners to detect tissue perfusion is limited. An attempt to overcome this restricted color and spectral Doppler sensitivity has given rise to recent ‘power Doppler’ techniques which demonstrate smaller, more peripheral vessels [1]. However, detection of parenchymal blood flow in organs that are not extremely superficial and relatively motionless remains difficult. Therefore, enhancement of the detection of blood flow by intravenous ultrasound contrast agents may allow a significant expansion of sonographic diagnostic capabilities. Such an agent may improve the ability of existing equipment to detect blood flow, perhaps avoiding costly upgrades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994; 190: 853–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wheatley MA, Schrope B, Shen P. Contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound: development and evaluation of polymer-coated microbubbles. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 713–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Jong N, Ten Cate FJ, Lancée CT, Roelandt JRTC, Bom N. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 1991; 29: 324–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Needleman L, Robbin ML, Beach KW, Platt JF, Merritt CB, Arger PH. Phase II clinical trial of a new perfluorochemical emulsion US contrast agent. Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, IL. Nov 25-Dec 1, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lopez-Ben RR, Robbin ML, Needleman L, Berland LL. US contrast agent imaging of liver hemangiomas. Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, IL. Nov 25-Dec 1, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aronson S, Wiencek JG, Feinstein SB. Assessment of renal blood flow with contrast ultrasonography. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 964–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlief R. Ultrasound contrast agents. Curr Opin Radiol 1991; 3: 198–207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarz KQ, Becher H, Schimpfky C, Vorwerk D, Bogdahn U, Schlief R. Doppler enhancements with SHU 508 A in multiple vascular regions. Radiology 1994; 193: 195–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: volumes 1 and 2. New York, Mosby Year Book. 1991: 220–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartman DS, Aronson S, Frazer H. Current status of imaging indeterminate renal masses. Radiol Clin N Am 1991; 29: 475–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson AJ, Hayes WS, Hartman DS, McCarthy WF, Davis CJ Jr. Renal oncocytoma and carcinoma: failure of differentiation with CT. Radiology 1993; 186: 693–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McClennan BL, Rabin DN. Kidney. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, editors. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press, 1989: 801–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erden I, Bediik Y, Karalezli G, Aytaç S, Anafarta K, Safak M. Characterization of renal masses with colour flow Doppler untrasonography. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 661–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takase K, Takajashi S, Tazawa S, Terasawa Y, Sakamoto K. Renal cell carcinoma associated with chronic renal failure: evaluation with sonographic angiography. Radiology 1994; 192: 787–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuijpers D, Jaspers R. Renal masses: differential diagnosis with pulsed Doppler US. Radiology 1989; 170: 59–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosniak MA. The small(≤3.0cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 1991; 179: 307–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Forman HP, Middleton WD, Melson GL, McClennan BL. Hyperechoic renal cell carcinomas: increase in detection at US. Radiology 1993; 188: 431–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Strotzer M, Lehner KB, Becker K. Detection of fat in a renal cell carcinoma mimicking angiomyolipoma. Radiology 1993; 188: 427–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hélénon O, Chrétien Y, Paraf F, Melki P, Denys A, Moreau JF. Renal cell carcinoma containing fat: demonstration with CT. Radiology 1993; 188: 429–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita Y, Watanabe T, Miyazaki T, Yamamoto H, Harada M, Takahashi M. Cystic renal cell carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1994; 35: 19–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fommei E, Volterrani D. Renal nuclear medicine. Sem Nucl Med 1995; 25: 183–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nally JV Jr. Provocative Captopril testing in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Urol Clin N Am 1994; 21: 227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bourgoignie JJ, Rubbert K, Sfakianakis GN. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibited renography for the diagnosis of ischemic kidneys. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 665–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stavros T, Harshfield D. Renal Doppler, renal artery stenosis, and renovascular hypertension: direct and indirect duplex sonographic abnormalities in patients with renal artery stenosis. Ultrasound Q 1994; 4: 217–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kliewer MA, Tupler RH, Carroll BA et al. Renal artery stenosis: analysis of Doppler waveform parameters and tardus-parvus pattern. Radiology 1993; 189: 779–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stavros AT, Parker SH, Yakes WF et al. Segmental stenosis of the renal artery: pattern recognition of tardus and parvus abnormalities with duplex sonography. Radiology 1992; 184: 487–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berland LL, Koslin DB, Routh WD, Keller FD. Renal artery stenosis: prospective evaluation of diagnosis with color duplex US compared with angiography. Radiology 1990; 174: 421–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mann SJ, Pickering TG, Sos TA et al. Captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal stenosis: accuracy and limitations. Am J Med 1991; 90: 30–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Badr KF, Brenner BM. Vascular injury to the kidney. In: Wilson JD, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ et al., editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 12th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1991; 1192–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM. Intrarenal arterial Doppler sonography in the detection of renal vein thrombosis of the native kidney. Am J Radiol 1994; 162: 1367–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lowe LH, Zagoria RJ, Baumgartner BR, Dyer RB. Role of imaging and intervention in complex infections of the urinary tract. Am J Radiol 1994; 163: 363–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Clautice-Engle TL, Jeffrey RB Jr. Power Doppler imaging in acute pyelonephritis. Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, IL. Nov 25-Dec 1. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grant EG, Perrella RR. Wishing won’t make it so: duplex Doppler sonography in the evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction. Am J Radiol 1990; 155: 538–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Perrella RR, Duerinckx AJ, Tessler FN et al. Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction by duplex Doppler sonography: a prospective study and review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 15: 544–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Perchik JE, Baumgartner BR, Bernardino ME. Renal transplant rejection: limited value of duplex Doppler sonography. Invest Radiol 1991; 26: 422–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaveggial LP, Perrella RR, Grant EG et al. Duplex Doppler sonography in renal allografts: the significance of reversed flow in diastole. Am J Radiol 1990; 155: 295–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aronson S, Thistlethwaite RJ, Walker R, Feinstein SB, Roizen MF. Safety and feasibility of renal blood flow determination during kidney transplant surgery with perfusion ultrasonography. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 353–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robbin, M.L. (1997). The promise of sonographic contrast agents in the kidney. In: Nanda, N.C., Schlief, R., Goldberg, B.B. (eds) Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5704-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5704-9_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6405-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5704-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics