Advertisement

Significance of subfossile chironomid remains in classification of shallow lakes

  • Klaus P. Brodersen
  • Claus Lindegaard
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 119)

Abstract

The relative species composition of subfossile chironomid headcapsules in surface sediments from ten shallow Danish lakes of different trophic status were analysed through similarity indices and multidimensional scaling. It was possible to distinguish between high and low productivity lakes by means of subfossile remains. The low productivity shallow lakes (TP< 150 μg P 1_1) were characterised by the taxa Psectrocladius, Pseudochironomus, Microtendipes and Pentaneurini. The high productivity lakes (TP>150 μg P 1_1) show similarities to littoral communities in eutrophic stratified lakes and are represented by genera such as Cricotopus, Procladius, Microchironomusand Chironomus. In surface samples from Lake Stigsholm subfossile species composition was compared with species composition in samples of trapped adult midges and samples of living larvae. The relative species composition between the three sample types varied considerably. Samples of living larvae showed a high degree of variation within the lake while surface sediment samples of subfossile chironomid remains seemed to be a persistent and reliable tool in classification of shallow lakes.

Key words

Chironomidae macroinvertebrate paleoecology shallow lakes benthic communities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, N. J., 1993. Natural versus anthropogenic change in lakes: The role of the sediment record. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. J. & B. V. Odgaard, 1994. Recent palaeolimnology of three shallow Danish lakes. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennion, H., 1994. A diatom-phosphorus transfer function for shallow, eutrophic ponds in southeast England. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bray, J. R. & J. T. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundin, L., 1949. Chironomiden und andere Bodentiere der sudschwedischen Urgebirgsseen. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drot-tningholm 30: 1–914.Google Scholar
  6. Brundin, L., 1958. The bottom faunistic lake type system and its application to the southern hemisphere. Moreover a theory of glacial erosion as a factor of productivity in lakes and oceans. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 13: 288–297.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, K. R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of change in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, K. R. & M. Ainsworth, 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92: 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, K. R. & R. H. Green, 1988. Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effect’ study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Nat. Envir. Res. Council, UK, 144 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Dévai, G. & J. Moldován, 1983. An attempt to trace eutrophication in a shallow lake (Balaton, Hungary) using chironomids. Hydrobiologia 103: 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, J. G., K. R. Clarke & R. M. Warwick, 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis, D. R. & T. C. Kane, 1995. Effect of substrate on colonization of experimental ponds by Chironomidae (Diptera). J. Freshwat. Ecol. 10: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann, W., 1971. Zur Taxonomie und Palökologie subfossiler Chironomiden (Dipt.) in Seesedimenten. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergeb. Limnol. 6: 1–50.Google Scholar
  15. Hofmann, W., 1986. Chironomid analysis. In Berglund, B. E. (ed.), Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. John Wiley, Chichester, England: 715–727.Google Scholar
  16. Hofmann, W., 1988. The significance of chironomid analysis (Insecta: Diptera) for paleolimnological research. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 62: 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, R. K., 1989. Classification of profundal chironomid Communities in oligotrophic/humic lakes of Sweden using environmental data. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 3: 167–175.Google Scholar
  18. Jónsson, E., A. Gardarsson & G. M. Gislason, 1986. A new window trap used in the assessment of the flight periods of Chironomidae and Simuliidae (Diptera). Freshwat. Biol. 16: 711–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moller Pillot, H. K. M., 1984a. De larven der Nederlandse Chironomidae (Diptera) (Tanypodinae, Chironomini). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 1A: 1–277.Google Scholar
  20. Moller Pillot, H. K. M., 1984b. De larven der Nederlandse Chironomidae (Diptera) (Orthocladiinae). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 1B: 1–175.Google Scholar
  21. Sæther, O. A., 1979. Chironomid communities as water quality indicators. Holarct. Ecol. 2: 65–74.Google Scholar
  22. Stevenson, A. C., H. J. B. Birks, R. J. Flower & R. W. Batterbee, 1989. Diatom-based pH reconstruction of lake acidification using canonical correspondence analysis. Ambio 18: 228–233.Google Scholar
  23. Thienemann, A., 1921. Biologische Seetypen und die Gründung einer hydrobiologischen Anstalt am Bodensee. Arch. Hydrobiol. 13: 347–370.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, I. R., 1987. Chironomidae (Diptera) in paleoecology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 6: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walker, I. R., 1993. Paleolimnological biomonitoring using freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall. New York: 306–343.Google Scholar
  26. Warwick, W. F., 1980. Palaeolimnology of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario: 2800 years of cultural influence. Can. Bull. Fish. aquat. Sci. 206: 1–117.Google Scholar
  27. Warwick, R. M. & K. R. Clarke, 1993. Comparing the severity of disturbance: a meta-analysis of marine macrobenthic community data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92: 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiederholm, T., 1980: Use of benthos in lake monitoring. J. wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 52: 537–547.Google Scholar
  29. Wiederholm, T. (ed.), 1983: Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Part 1, Larvae. Ent. Scand. Suppl. 19: 1–457.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus P. Brodersen
    • 1
  • Claus Lindegaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Freshwater Biological LaboratoryUniversity of CopenhagenHillerødDenmark

Personalised recommendations