Skip to main content

Abstract

It has become apparent that our intuitive notions of space and time are inadequate for developing a theory of quantum gravity. It is perhaps worthwhile to understand where our macroscopically-developed spatial instinct is implicit in the concept of manifold, and to consider alternative methods for defining (vis-a-vis explicating) space and time. A simple example for generating a topos over a fundamental set is provided to illustrate the potential basis of such a definition.

“Many theoretical physicists believe that to progress much further it will be necessary to rethink our understanding of space-time. The 4D manifold structure of general relativity does not seem adequate to describe the kind of processes which are implicated in quantum gravity [1]”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gibbs, P.: 1995, Small Scale Structure of Space-Time: A Bibliographical Review, hepth/9506171, p. 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Copi, I.: 1954, Symbolic Logic, ( The MacMillan Company, New York ), p. 149

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nerlich, G.: 1994, The Shape of Space, 2nd ed, ( Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge ), p. 98

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wald, R. M.: 1984, General Relativity, ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago ), p. 12

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein, D.: 1991, The Philosophy of Vacuum(Clarendon Press, Oxford), eds. Saunders, S. and Brown, H. R., p. 254

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ratner, H. (director): 1989, “Sensation and Perception,” from Psychology, The Study of Human Behavior, produced by Coastline Community College

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finkelstein, D. and Hallidy, W. H.: 1991, Intl. J. Theoretical Physics, 30, 481

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen, J.: 1994, Physics Essays, 7, 335–340

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stuckey, W.M. (1997). Defining Spacetime. In: Tifft, W.G., Cocke, W.J. (eds) Modern Mathematical Models of Time and their Applications to Physics and Cosmology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5628-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5628-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6372-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5628-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics