Advertisement

On the Difference Between Transcendental and Empirical Subjectivity

  • David Carr
Chapter
  • 111 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 25)

Abstract

From the time his phenomenological method was fully developed, Husserl always distinguished between transcendental subjectivity and its empirical or “mundane” counterpart. In this, as in many other things, Husserl’s work was influenced by Kant and the neo-Kantians, who made a similar distinction. In this paper I want to examine this distinction, primarily in its Husserlian form, and consider some of its implications.

Keywords

Natural Attitude Philosophical Question Phenomenological Method Ontological Question Transcendental Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See Alfred Schutz, The Phenomenology of the Social World, G. Walsh & F. Lehnert (Trans.s) (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967, p. 97); also Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Reality, A. Broderson (Ed.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964, p. 25).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Habermas, J., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, F. Lawrence (Trans.) (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1987) passim.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, pp. 152, 178f.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986). See p. 62n.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    A. MacIntyre, “Relativism, Power and Philosophy” in After Philosophy, K. Baynes, J. Bohman & T. McCarthy (Eds.) (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1987, p. 385).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy.First Book., F. Kersten (Trans.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, p. 133).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Cartesian Meditations, D. Cairns (Trans.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960, p. 66f).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, D. Carr (Trans.) (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970, p. 178f).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, p.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Phenomenology of Perception, C. Smith (Trans.) (New York: Humanities Press, 1962, p. xii.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Logical Investigations, Vol. II, J. N. Findlay (Trans.) (New York: Humanities Press, 1970, p. 549).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Fink, E., Studien zur Phänomenologie 1930–1939 (Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966, p. 122). “The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism,” R. O. Elveton (Trans.). In The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings,” R. O. Elveton (Ed.) (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970, pp. 73–147).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    Carr, D., “Kant, Husserl and the Non-Empirical Ego,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 74, 11, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer (Trans.) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, p. 189f).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Nagel, op. cit. p. 51f.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Formal and Transcendental Logic, D. Cairns (Trans.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969, p. 272f).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Ideen II, p. 180.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Ideas I, p. 58.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Fink, op. cit. pp. 110f.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    J. P. Sartre, The Transcendence of the Ego, F. Williams & R. Kirkpatrick (Trans.s) (New York: Farrar, Straus & Co. 1957, p. 102f).Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Nagel, op. cit. p. 10f.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    The Crisis, p. 100.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    For a strong version of this interpretation of Husserl see G. Funke, Phänomenologie: Metaphysik oder Methode?, 3rd ed. (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1979).Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Speech and Phenomena, p. 4.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    Logical Investigations, Vol. I, p. 88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Carr
    • 1
  1. 1.Emory UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations