Abstract
We introduce a new prior—the weak plate—to Bayesian tomographic reconstruction. The weak plate captures the piecewise ramplike spatial structure evident in primate autoradiograph source distributions. The weak plate is a part of a family of “mechanical” models—weak membrane (1st order), weak plate (2nd order), and weak quadric (3rd order)—in which a class of smoothness constraints derived from properties of ideal physical materials are used as models in the associated reconstruction problem. Since “weak” priors generate local minimain MAP estimation, we have designed novel Generalized Expectation-Maximization deterministic annealing algorithms to alleviate this problem. Our simulation studies qualitatively demonstrate the improvements over the weak membrane and maximum likelihood reconstructions.
This work was supported by NIH R01-NS32879.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 1, pp. 113–122, 1982.
S. Geman, E. Bienenstock, and R. Doursat, “Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma,” Neural Computation, 4, pp. 1–58, 1992.
S. Geman and D. E. McClure, “Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, LII-4, pp. 5–21, 1987.
T. Hebert and R. Leahy, “A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 8, pp. 194–202, June 1989.
G. Gindi, M. Lee, A. Rangarajan, and G. Zubal, “Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 12, pp. 670–680, Dec. 1993.
G. Gindi, A. Rangarajan, M. Lee, P. J. Hong, and G. Zubal, “Bayesian reconstruction for emission tomography via deterministic annealing,” in Info. Proc. Med. Imag., H. Barrett and A. Gmitro, eds., pp. 322–338, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
G. Gindi and A. Rangarajan, “What can SPECT learn from autoradiography?,” in Proc. Nucl. Sci. Symp./Med. Imag. Conf., vol. 4, pp. 1715–1719, IEEE Press, 1994.
D. Geman and G. Reynolds, “Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 14, pp. 367–383, March 1992.
S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 6, pp. 721–741, Nov. 1984.
A. Blake and A. Zisserman, Visual Reconstruction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
A. Rangarajan and R. Chellappa, “Markov random field models in image processing,” in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, M. A. Arbib, ed., pp. 564–567, MIT Press, 1995.
I. Elfadel, “Convex potentials and their conjugates in analog mean-field optimization,” Neural Computation, 7, pp. 1079–1104, Sept. 1995.
A. Rangarajan and R. Chellappa, “A continuation method for image estimation using the adiabatic approximation,” in Markov Random Fields: Theory and Application, R. Chellappa and A. K. Jain, eds., pp. 69–91, Academic Press, 1993.
D. Geiger and F. Girosi, “Parallel and deterministic algorithms from MRFs: Surface reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13, pp. 401–412, May 1991.
R. Hathaway, “Another interpretation of the EM algorithm for mixture distributions,” Stat. and Prob. Lett, 4, pp. 53–56, 1986.
S.-J. Lee, A. Rangarajan, and G. Gindi, “Bayesian image reconstruction in SPECT using higher-order mechanical models as priors,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 14, pp. 669–680, Dec. 1995.
J. Llacer and E. Veklerov, “Feasible images and practical stopping rules for iterative algorithms in emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 8, pp. 186–193,1989.
S.-J. Lee, G. Gindi, G. Zubal, and A. Rangarajan, “Using ground-truth data to design priors in Bayesian SPECT reconstruction,” in Info. Proc. Med. Imag., Y. Bizais, C. Barillot, and R. D. Paola, eds., pp. 27–38, Kluwer Acad. Pub., 1995.
Z. Zhou, R. M. Leahy, and E. U. Mumcuoglu, “Maximum likelihood hyperparameter estimation for Gibbs priors with applications to PET,” in Info. Proc. Med. Imag., Y. Bizais, C. Barillot, and R. D. Paola, eds., pp. 39–51, Kluwer Acad. Pub., 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rangarajan, A., Lee, SJ., Gindi, G. (1996). Mechanical Models as Priors in Bayesian Tomographic Reconstruction. In: Hanson, K.M., Silver, R.N. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6284-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5430-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive