Abstract
A methodology has been developed which allows the risk posed by pests to be addressed in the context of shifting intensification levels of rice production in Asia. The term ‘pest’ is used here to encompass any harmful agent, including pathogens, insects, and weeds. This methodology combines two separate approaches: assessing risk probability, and quantifying risk magnitude. Risk probability may be defined as the probability of a particular pest combination occurring in a given production situation. It can be derived from surveys in selected sites. Yield loss — the gap between attainable and actual yields — is taken as one measure of risk magnitude. It is assessed from a crop loss data base developed from a series of field experiments, where inputs to the rice crop and pests are manipulated independently. The analysis indicates that rice tungro virus disease, rice sheath blight, and weed infestation correspond to very high risk magnitudes. Yield losses due to pest injuries are often strongly influenced by changes in production situation, and, therefore, by variation in attainable yield. The pattern of this relationship strongly depends on the nature of the pest, however. Different pest scenarios from contrasting production situations in Uttar Pradesh, Central Luzon, eastern Thailand and the Mekong Delta can be used to illustrate the present situation, and forward hypotheses on the future need of research at the system level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benzécri J P(1973) L’Analyse des données. Tome 2. L’Analyse des correspondances. Dunod, Paris, France. 632 p.
Castilla N P, Elazegui F A, Mabbayad M O, Barrion A T, Savary S (1993) Combined effects of pests in farmers’ fields: Methodological outlines of a yield loss data base in rice. Rice Res. Notes 18(3):41–42.
De Wit C T (1982) La productivité des pâturages Sahéliens. Pages 22–35 in Penning de Vries F W T, Djitèye M A (Eds.) La productivité des pâturages Sahéliens — une étude des sols, des végétations et de l’exploitation de cette ressource naturelle. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dervin C (1988) Comment interpréter les résultats d’une analyse factorielle des correspondances? ITCF, Paris, France. 75 p.
Elazegui F A, Soriano J, Bandong J, Estorninos L, Jonson I, Teng P S, Shepard B M, Litsinger J A, Moody K, Hibino H (1990) Methodology used in the IRRI integrated pest survey. Pages 241–271 in Crop loss assessment in rice. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.
Parlevliet J E, Van Ommeren A (1975) Partial resistance of barley to leaf rust: Puccinia hordei. II. Relationship between field trials microplot tests and latent period. Euphytica 24:293–303.
Pinnschmidt H O, Nguyen Dan Long, Tran Tan Viet, Le Dinh Don, Teng P S (1995) Characterization of pests, pest losses, and production patterns in rainfed lowland rice of the Mekong River Delta. Pages 223–242 in Denning G L, Vo-Tong Xuan (Eds.) Vietnam and IRRI: A partnership in rice research. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.
Pinnschmidt H O, Chamarerk V, Cabulan N, Dela Pena F, Long N D, Savary S, Klein-Gebbink H W, Teng P S (1996) Yield gap analysis of rainfed lowland systems to guide crop and pest management. In Kropff M J, Teng P S, Aggarwal P K, Bouma J, Bouman B A M, Jones J W, Van Laar H H (Eds.) Applications of systems approaches at the field level. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (in press).
Poate D (1988) A review of methods for measuring crop production from small-holder producers. Exp. Agric. 24:1–14.
Rowe W D (1980) Risk assessment approaches and methods. Pages 3–29 in Conran G (Ed.) Society, technology, and risk assessment. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Savary S (Ed.) (1991) Approches de la pathologie des cultures tropicales. L’Exemple de l’arachide en Afrique de l’Ouest. Karthala-Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération, Paris, France. 288 p.
Savary S, Zadoks J C (1992) Analysis of crop loss in the multiple pathosystem groundnut-rust-leaf spot. I. Six experiments. Crop Prot. 11:99–109.
Savary S, Elazegui F A, Moody K, Teng P S (1994) Characterization of rice cropping practices and multiple pest systems in the Philippines. Agric. Syst. 46:385–408.
Savary S, Madden L V, Zadoks J C, Klein-Gebbinck H W (1995) Use of categorical information and correspondence analysis in plant disease epidemiology. Advances in botanical research incorporating. Adv. Plant Pathol. 21:213–240.
Singh H M, Srivastava R K, Singh R K, Savary S (1994) Illustrating the concept of recommendation domain in IPM: An Indian case study. Int. Rice Res. Notes 19:28–30.
Teng P S (1983) Estimating and interpreting disease intensity and loss in commercial fields. Phytopathology 73:1587–1590.
Teng P S (Ed.) (1987) Crop loss assessment and pest management. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, USA. 270 p.
Teng P S, Gaunt R E (1980) Modelling systems of disease and yield loss in cereals. Agric. Syst. 6:131–154.
Zadoks J C (1985) On the conceptual basis of crop loss assessment: The threshold theory. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23:455–473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savary, S., Elazegui, F.A., Pinnschmidt, H.O., Teng, P.S. (1997). Characterization of rice pest constraints in Asia: an empirical approach. In: Teng, P.S., Kropff, M.J., ten Berge, H.F.M., Dent, J.B., Lansigan, F.P., van Laar, H.H. (eds) Applications of Systems Approaches at the Farm and Regional Levels Volume 1. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6278-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5416-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive