Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 60))

Abstract

Ronald Coase won the Nobel Prize in economics with an approach to doing economics that is distinctly old fashioned. In terms of method, Coase belongs to the late nineteenth and early twentieth century British tradition. To demonstrate this, we use the Appendix of this paper to juxtapose Coase’s views on method with those reflected in W.A.S. Hewins’ essay on economics in the classic 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica 2 For all intents and purposes Coase’s views are identical with those expressed in Hewins’ essay.3 This may seem a bit odd, given the close association of Coase’s name with the Chicago school. However, as Posner (1993b) and Medema (1994a,b; 1995b) have pointed out, it would be incorrect to associate Coase with the so-called Chicago view. In fact, Coase quite clearly identifies his own views with those of Alfred Marshall, and, given the important role played by Marshall in the establishment of the British approach to doing economics in the early 20th century, it becomes less surprising that Coase’s views coincide so closely with this British tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Broome, John. 1991. “Utility.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, Karl. 1992. “Ronald Coase-Old Fashioned Scholar.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. British Broadcasting: A Study in Monopoly London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. “Discussion of’ Direct Regulation and Market Performance in the American Economy,’ by Richard E. Caves, and’ The Effectiveness of Economic Regulation: A Legal View,’ by Roger C. Cramton.” American Economic Review 54: 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970. “Social Cost and Public Policy.” In G.A. Edwards, ed., Exploring the Frontiers of Administration: Six Essays for Managers Toronto: York University Faculty of Administration Studies, Bureau of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972. “Industrial Organization: A Proposal for Research.” In Victor R. Fuchs, ed., Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. “Economists and Public Policy.” In J. Fred Weston, ed., Large Corporations in a Changing Society New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. “The Lighthouse in Economics.” Journal of Law and Economics 17: 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. “Marshall on Method.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977. “Economics and Contiguous Disciplines.” In Mark Perlman, ed., The Organization and Retrieval of Economic Knowledge Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. “Economics and Biology: A Comment.” American Economic Review 68: 244–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. How Should Economists Choose? G. Warren Nutter Lecture in Political Economy, Washington, D.C.: The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. “The New Institutional Economics.” Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 140: 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988a. “Blackmail.” Virginia Law Review 74: 655–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988b. “The Nature of the Firm: Origins.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988c. “The Nature of the Firm: Influence.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988d. The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. “The Institutional Structure of Production.” American Economic Review 82: 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993a. “Coase on Posner on Coase.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993b. “Law and Economics at Chicago.” Journal of Law and Economics 36: 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, Thráinn. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Victor P. 1981. “Pigou on Complex Contracts and Welfare Economics.” Research in Law and Economics 3: 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunbaum, Adolf and Wesley C. Salmon (eds.). 1988. The Limitations of Deductivism Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewins, W. A. S. 1911. “Economics.” Encyclopedia Britannica 11: 898–910. New York: Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Paul. 1992. Modern Times New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Steven. 1981. “Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique.” Regulation January/February: 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S.. 1962,1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, John. 1985. Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics 8th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. Principles of Economics 9th (variorum) ed. Edited by C.W. Guillebaud. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, Steven G. 1994a. Ronald H. Coase London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994b. “Ronald Coase’s Contributions and Major Themes.” History of Economic Ideas II(3): 15–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995b. “Ronald H. Coase on Economics and Economic Method.” History of Economics Review 24(Summer): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest. 1979. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, Arthur C. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall New York: Augustus M. Kelley

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962. The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed.. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography LaSalle, 111.: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 1983. The Economics of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. “An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law.” Columbia Law Review 85: 1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993a. “The New Institutional Economics Meets Law and Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993b. “Ronald Coase and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1984. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 3rd ed. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, Mark. 1988. The Economy of the Earth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley. 1967. The Foundations of Scientific Inference Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, Warren J. 1989. “The Legal-Economic Nexus.” George Washington Law Review 57: 1556–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya and Bernard Williams (eds.). 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. 1991. Quasi-rational Economics New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. O. Jr. 1991. “Comment: Does Benefit Cost Analysis Stand Alone: Rights and Standing.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10: 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. O. Jr., and Dwight Dively. 1994. Benefit Cost Analysis in Theory and Practice New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zerbe, R.O., Medema, S.G. (1998). Ronald Coase, the British Tradition, and the Future of Economic Method. In: Medema, S.G. (eds) Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5350-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5350-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6249-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5350-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics