Abstract
This chapter explores the potential of Local Agenda 21 (LA21) to transform the structures of local government decision-making using examples from the Southeast region of England. It utilises the theoretical ideas developed by ‘new institutionalist’ writers to examine the experience of Local Agenda fora at three distinct spatial levels: regional, sub-regional and local. It reports on a varied pattern of participation and influence on decision-making and seeks to understand the differences in relation to a dynamic, structured, fragile and fractured series of discourses. The main conclusions from the case study analysis are that:
-
the integration of LA 21 action programmes into government decision-making is a slow and partial process. Even in the most energetic authorities and agencies, there is evidence of significant organisational and cultural barriers to attempts to restructure decision-making in line with ideals of LA21.
-
there is limited co-ordination of the different spatial levels of LA21 which weakens the principle of ‘Think Global, Act Local’. Communication of ideas and proposals between regional, sub-regional and local LA21 fora is based on a fragile network of individuals who are active in different fora.
-
the LA21 process has made an important contribution to the ‘quality’ of decision-making in government organisations at the different levels. In particular it has sought to establish ‘rational’ criteria and frameworks, based on the principles of sustainable development, with which to test policies and proposals; introduce alternative forms of knowledge and perspective into decision-making dominated by ‘professional/expert’ cultures; and (re)emphasise the concept of equity and the distributional implications of policies and proposals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agyeman, J. and Evans, B. (eds.) (1994) Local environmental policies and strategies, Harlow.
Doak, A.J., Stott, M. and Therivel, R. (1998) From SEA to sustainability. The life and times of the SERPLAN Sustainability Panel, Regional Studies 32.1, 73–78.
Doak, A.J. and Martin, A. (1998) Consensus building for sustainable development. The case of Lancashire, in A. Gouldson and P. Roberts (eds.), Integrating economic development and environmental management. Strategies for local government, London.
Doak, A.J. and McLoughlin, M.J. (1998) The integration of Local Agenda 21 into local planning practice. A comparative analysis of Liverpool and Reading, Proceedings of the 1998 International Sustainable Development Research Conference, April 3–4, Leeds, Shipley.
Fleming, N.H. (1994) Community-led sustainable development. To GLOBE or not to GLOBE?, Reading.
Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society, Cambridge.
Habermas, J. (1984) The theory of communicative action — volume 1. Reason and the rationalisation of society, London.
Healey, P. (1990) Policy processes in planning, Policy and Politics 18/2, 91–104.
Healey, P. (1996) Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies, Basingstoke.
Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A. (eds.) (1995) Managing cities. The new urban context, Chichester.
Hollins, M. and Percy, S. (1995; World wide to street wise. Lessons from the WWF/RBC GLOBE Project, Goldalming.
Jones, C. (1995) Working in neighbourhoods, Goldalming.
Lindley, I. (1994) Leicester’s approach to Local Agenda 21. External and internal strategies, Proceedings of The 1994 European Environment Conference, University of Nottingham, September 1272–13, Shipley.
Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (eds.) (1992) Policy networks in British government, Oxford.
Patterson, A. and Theobald, K.S. (1995) Sustainable development, Agenda 21 and the new local governance in Britain, Regional Studies 29.8, 773–777.
Reading Borough Council (1991) Environmental strategy, Reading.
Reading Borough Council (1997) Reading’s Agenda 21 statement, Reading.
Selman, P. (1996) Local sustainability. Managing and planning ecologically sound places, London.
SERPLAN (1995a) Sustainability principles, RPC 2867R, London.
SERPLAN (1995b) Wo king with the public, RPC 2762, London.
SERPLAN (1996) Strategic environmental assessment. A methodology and appraisal framework for the review of the regional strategy, SERP 68, London.
SERPLAN (1997) A sustainable development strategy for the Southeast. Position statement. SERP 200A, London.
Sharwood, M. and Russell, S. (1997) A review of Local Agenda 21 fora, Local Environment News 3/3, 6–7.
UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992) Agenda 21.
UNA-UK (United Nations Association United Kingdom and Community Development Association) (1995) Towards local sustainability. A review of current activity on Local Agenda 21 in the UK, London.
Young, S. (1996) Promoting participation and community-based partnerships in the context of Local Agenda 21. A report for practitioners, European Policy Research Unit Paper No. 1/96, Manchester.
WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) (1995) WWF and Local Agenda 21. A summary of WWF’s strategy, Goldalming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doak, J. (1998). Changing the World Through Participative Action: The Dynamics and Potential of Local Agenda 21. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M., Huitema, D., O’Toole, L.J. (eds) Participation and the Quality of Environmental Decision Making. Environment & Policy, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5330-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5330-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6240-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5330-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive