Skip to main content

Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation

  • Chapter
Mutation and Evolution

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution ((CIGE,volume 7))

  • 620 Accesses

Abstract

Most theoretical models in population genetics fail to deal in a realistic manner with the process of mutation. They are consequently not informative about the central evolutionary problem of the origin, progression, and limit of adaptation. Here we present an explicit distribution of phenotypes expected in an ensemble of populations under a mutation-selection-drift model that allows mutations with a distribution of adaptive values to occur randomly in time. The model of mutation is a geometrical model in which the effect of a new mutation is determined by a random angle in n dimensional space and in which the adaptive value (fitness) of an organism decreases as the square of the deviation of its phenotype from an optimum. Each new mutation is subjected to random genetic drift and fixed or lost according to its selective value and the effective population number. Time is measured in number of fixation events, so that, at any point in time, each population is regarded as genetically homogeneous. In this mutation-selection-drift model, among an ensemble of populations, the equilibrium average phenotype coincides with the optimum because the distribution of positive and negative deviations from the optimum is symmetrical. However, at equilibrium, the mean of the absolute value of the deviation from the optimum equals \(\sqrt {n/8Ns)} \), where n is the dimensionality of the trait space, N is the effective population size, and 5 is the selection coefficient against a mutation whose phenotype deviates by one unit from the optimum. Furthermore, at equilibrium, the average fitness across the ensemble of populations equals 1-(n + 1)/8N. When n is sufficiently large, there is a strong mutation pressure toward the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations. This feature relates our model to the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bürger, R. & R. Lande, 1994. On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138: 901–912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F. & M. Kimura, 1970. An Introduction to Population Gene-ics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D.L. & A.G. Clark, 1997. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D.L., D.E. Dykhuizen & A.M. Dean, 1985. Limits of adaptation: The evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics 111: 655–674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D.L. & C.H. Taubes, 1996. Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: Selection without adaptation. J. Theoret. Biol. 182: 303–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kacser, H. & J.A. Burns, 1973. The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 32: 65–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacser, H. & J.A. Burns, 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639–666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, P.D. & H. Kacser, 1987. Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure. Genetics 117: 319–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., 1991. Electrophoresis in the development of evolutionary genetics: Milestone or millstone?. Genetics 128: 657–662.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T., 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246: 96–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T., 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T. & H. Tachida, 1990. Theoretical study of near neutrality: I.Heterozygosity and rate of mutant substitution. Genetics 126: 219–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartl, D.L., Taubes, C.H. (1998). Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation. In: Woodruff, R.C., Thompson, J.N. (eds) Mutation and Evolution. Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6193-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5210-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics