Skip to main content

Part of the book series: ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering ((ICAS,volume 6))

Abstract

Clear examples of the difficulties associated with applying CFD techniques to apparently simple problems are provided by computational aeroacoustics and computational electromagnetics. These applications require accurate wave propagation over long distances for a wide range of frequencies, placing a severe demand on numerical algorithms, and raising issues related to efficiency, accuracy, compatible space and time treatments, high frequency data, propagation along characteristic surfaces, isotropy, stable and accurate artificial boundary treatments, and nonrestrictive stability bounds. This paper briefly presents two methods for the development of finite difference algorithms which are intended to address these issues. High order single step explicit algorithms are possible, and examples with up to eleventh order accuracy will be shown. High resolution algorithms in the sense of (Lele, 1992) are also possible, with amplification factor and relative phase change per time step which are virtually 1 for normal mode frequencies in [0, π] and CFL numbers in [0, 1]. If our most accurate algorithm is used to propagate an initial periodic sine wave, then after five periods with four grid points per wavelength, the maximum error is O[10-6], and after five hundred thousand periods with eight grid points per wavelength, the maximum error is O[10-4]. High order algorithms are relatively more efficient (Kreiss & Oliger, 1972), and their relative efficiency tends to increase as the error bound decreases, as the simulation time increases, and as the spatial dimension increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chen, C.-J., Naseri-Neshat, H., and Li, P, P., “The Finite Analytic Method,” Iowa Institute of Hydrolic Research Report No. 232, Vol. 1–4, The University of Iowa, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godunov, S. K., “Finite Difference Method for Numerical Computation of Discontinuous Solutions of the Equation of Fluid Dynamics,” Mat. Sbornik., Vol. 47, 1959, p. 271.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, J. W., “An Approach to the Development of Numerical Algorithms for first Order Linear Hyperbolic Systems in Multiple Space Dimensions: The Constant Coefficient Case,” NASA TM-106928, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, J. W. and Hagstrom, T., “Accurate Algorithms and Radiation Boundary Conditions for Linearized Euler Equations,” AIAA Paper 96–1660, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, T, T., “On High Order Radiation Boundary Conditions,” IMA Volume on Computational Wave Propagation, B. Engquist and A. Majda, eds., Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S.R., “Uniformly High Order Accurate Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes, III,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 71, 1987, p. 231.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, H. O. and Oliger, J., “Comparison of accurate methods for the integration of hyperbolic equations,” Tellus, Vol. 24, 1972, p. 199.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lax, P. D. and Wendroff, B., “Systems of Conservation Laws,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math, Vol. 13, 1960, p. 217.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lele, S. K., “Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral like Resolution,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 103, 1992, pp. 16–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Takewaki, H., Nishiguchi, A., and Yabe, T., “Cubic Interpolated Pseudo-particle Method (CIP) for solving Hyperbolic-Type Equations,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 61, 1985, pp. 261–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vichnevetsky, R. and Bowles, J.B., Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1982.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodrich, J.W. (1998). Accurate Finite Difference Algorithms. In: Venkatakrishnan, V., Salas, M.D., Chakravarthy, S.R. (eds) Barriers and Challenges in Computational Fluid Dynamics. ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5169-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5169-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6173-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5169-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics