Skip to main content

On Multidimensional Positively Conservative High-Resolution Schemes

  • Chapter
Barriers and Challenges in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Part of the book series: ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering ((ICAS,volume 6))

Abstract

There is often a need to compute flows containing regions in which the total energy is overwhelmingly dominated by the kinetic energy mode. This poses a difficulty if the equations are solved in conservation form. Pressure, being a difference of two large quantities, may be contaminated by various types of numerical error, and its value may become negative. It is also possible for a particular scheme to produce negative density even if an exact solution does not contain vacuum zones. As soon as density or pressure become negative a computation fails. When the problem occurs, it can be usually postponed by lowering the time step. However, one needs a scheme that preserves positivity for all time, under conditions not much more severe that the usual CFL restriction. This problem has recently received growing attention in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barth, T.J., “On unstructured grids and solvers,” In Computational Fluid Dynamics, Lecture Series 1990–03, VKI, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrier, P., Dubroca, B., and Flandrin, L., “Un solveur de Riemann approché pour l’‘’etude d’‘’ecoulements ypersoniques bidimensionnels, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Vol. 317, 1993, pp. 1083–1086.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donat, R. and Marquina, A., “Capturing shock reflections: An improved flux formula,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 125, No. 1, April 1996, pp. 42–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Einfeldt, B., Munz, C.D,, Roe, P.L., and Sj‘’’ogreen, B., “On Godunov-type methods near low densities,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 92, 1992, pp. 273–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Einfeldt, B., “On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., Vol. 25, No. 2, April 1988, pp. 294–318.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flandrin, L., “Méthodes ‘cell-centered’ pour l’approximation des équations d’Euler et de Navier-Stokes sur des maillages non structurés,”Ph.D. thesis, l’Universite Bordeaux I, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gear, C.W., “Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godunov, S.K., “A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of hydrodynamic equations,” Mat. Sb., Vol. 47, No. 3, 1959, pp. 271–306 (in Russian).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lion, M.-S., “Further progress in numerical flux scheme,” In 15 th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Monterey, CA, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osher, S. and Solomon, F., “Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws,” Math. Comput., Vol. 38, No. 158, April 1982, pp. 339–374.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk,.J.J., “A contribution to the Great Riemann solver debate, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1994, pp. 555–574. Also ICASE Report No. 92–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P.L., “Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 43, 1981, pp. 357–372.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S., “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shockcapturing schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 77, No. 2, August 1988, pp. 439–471.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van Leer, B., “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 32, 1979, pp. 101–136.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, P. and Colella, P., “The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 54, 1984, pp. 115–173.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Martinelli, L., and Jameson, A., “Gas-kinetic finite volume methods, flux-vector splitting, and artificial diffusion,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 120, No. 1, September 1995, pp. 48–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Linde, T., Roe, P.L. (1998). On Multidimensional Positively Conservative High-Resolution Schemes. In: Venkatakrishnan, V., Salas, M.D., Chakravarthy, S.R. (eds) Barriers and Challenges in Computational Fluid Dynamics. ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5169-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5169-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6173-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5169-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics