Skip to main content

Smallest Integral Combinatorial Box

  • Chapter
Book cover Applications of Fibonacci Numbers
  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

To prove or disprove the existence of a perfect box is an old unsolved problem (see [2,4]). Here a perfect box or cuboid means a rectangular parallelepiped with all edges, face diagonals and space diagonals of integer lengths. More general, in [5] combinatorial boxes are considered, that are, convex bodies with six quadrilaterals as faces. These bodies then also have 8 vertices and 12 edges. In [5] the existence of integral combinatorial boxes is proved by the presentation of 20 examples where all edges, face diagonals and space diagonals are of integer lengths. It is conjectured in [5] that one of these examples (see Figure 1) is the smallest integral combinatorial box, that means, that the largest distance between any two vertices, 17 in this case, is the minimum of any largest integer distance between vertices of all integral combinatorial boxes. Here we will prove that up to this largest distance 17 other integral combinatorial boxes do not exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, M. Geometry I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1987.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Guy, R.K. Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Harborth, H., Kemnitz, A. and Möller, M. “An upper bound for the minimum diameter of integral point sets.” Discrete Compnt. Geom., Vol. 9 (1993): pp. 427–432.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Klee, V. and Wagon, S. Old and New Unsolved Problems in Plane Geometry and Number theory. Mathematical Association America (MAA) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson, B. E. and Jordan, J. H. “Integer hexaedra equivalent to perfect boxes.” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 102 (1995): pp. 41–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson, B.E and Jordan, J. H. “The rational heart of the integer Fibonacci pentagons.” Applications of Fibonacci Numbers. Volume 6, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Edited by G.E. Bergum, A. N. Philippou and A. F. Horadam, 1996, pp. 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner, J. “Integer hexaedra.” Preprint 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harborth, H., Möller, M. (1998). Smallest Integral Combinatorial Box. In: Bergum, G.E., Philippou, A.N., Horadam, A.F. (eds) Applications of Fibonacci Numbers. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5020-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5020-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6107-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5020-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics