Abstract
Many data sets used by EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) will be collected and managed by groups other than EPA as the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources develops the inter-agency National Environmental Monitoring Initiative. Managing these data requires a change from a database managed solely by EPA to a model where there is, in addition to distributed databases, truly distributed ownership and responsibility. Common standards, data directories, and data descriptions allow data of interest to be located, understood, and downloaded. The level of EMAP data management practices applied to a data set is based on the degree of EMAP responsibility for the data. The EMAP Data Directory is an Oracle database that tracks data sets of interest and contains sufficient information about a data set for a user to determine if the data are of interest. Some of the data sets listed in the Directory are in the possession of EMAP and are accessible on the EMAP WWW site (http://www.epa.gov/emap). Other data sets in the Directory are managed, documented, and made available by other organizations. The Data Catalog contains metadata about data sets in the possession of EMAP and provides the user with information about methods, assumptions, and data quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barton, G. 1997. NOAA and the Federal Geographic Data Committee: Earth System Monitor 7(3), March 1997.
Barton, G. 1996. NOAA Environmental Services Data Directory. Earth System Monitor, December 1996. 6–8.
CENR. 1994. “ The U.S. Global Change Data and Information System Implementation Plan”, Report, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C.
Chinn, H. and Bledsoe, C. 1997. “Internet access to ecological information-the US LTER All-Site Bibliography Project”, BioScience 47(1),:50–57.
ESA. 1995. Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Future of Long-Term Ecological Data. Vol. 1. http://www.sdsc.edu/~ESA/~ESA
FGDC. 1994. “Content standards for digital geospatial metadata, June 8, 1994”, Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington, DC..
Frithsen, J. B. I996a. “Suggested modifications to the EMAP data set directory and catalog for implementation in US EPA Region 10. Draft, June 10, 1996”, Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC., by Versar, Inc., Columbia, MD.
Frithsen, J. B. 1996b. “Directory Keywords: Restricted vs. unrestricted vocabulary. Draft, May 21, 1996”, Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC., by Versar, Inc., Columbia, MD.
Frithsen, J. B. and Strebel, D. E. 1995. “Summary documentation for EMAP data: Guidelines for the Information Management Directory. 30 April 1995”, Report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), Washington, DC. Prepared by Versar, Inc., Columbia, MD.
GCRP. 1995a. GCDIS Implementation 1995. Vol. I -Interagency Implementation. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C.
GCRP. 1995b. GCDIS Implementation 1995. Vol. II -Agency Implementation. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C.
Ingersoll, R. C., Seastedt, T. R. and Hartman, M. 1997. “A model information management system for ecological research”, BioScience 47(5): 310–316.
LTER. 1995. Draft proceedings of the 1995 Long-Term Ecological Research Data Management Workshop, July 27–29, 1995, Snowbird, Colorado.
NASA. 1991. “Directory Interchange Format Manual; Version 4.0”, NASA, National Space Science Data Center, Greenbelt, MD. December 1991.
NRC. 1995. “Finding the forest in the trees: The challenge of combining diverse environmental data”, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 129 pp.
Strebel, D. E., and Frithsen, J. B. 1995a. “Guidelines for distributing EMAP data and information via the Internet. April 30, 1995”, Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), Washington, DC. Prepared by Versar, Inc., Columbia, MD.
Strebel, D. E., and Frithsen, J. B. 1995b. “Scientific documentation for EMAP data: Guidelines for the information management catalog. Draft: April 30, 1995”, Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Modeling, Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Prepared by Versar, Inc., Columbia, MD.
U.S. EPA. 1997a (in prep). “EMAP Research Strategy” (January 1997 draft). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NHEERL, Research Triangle Park, NC.
U.S. EPA. 1997b (in prep). “EMAP Research Plan” (March 1997 draft). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NHEERL, Research Triangle Park, NC.
U. S. EPA. 1997c. Update to: “Guidelines for distributing EMAP data and information via the Internet”, U. S. EPA, NHEERL, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI.
U.S. EPA. 1997d. 1997 update to ORD’s strategic plan. EPA/600/R-97/015. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
U. S. EPA. 1996a. “EMAP information management plan. Draft, Oct 30, 1996”, U. S. EPA, NHEERL, Narragansett, RI.
U.S. EPA. 1996b. (in prep.). “ORD Information Management Strategic Plan”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. 1996c. (in prep.). “Providing information to decision makers to protect human health and the environment. Information Resources Management Five-Year IRM Implementation Plan, February 1996 draft”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and Resources Management, Washington, DC.
U. S. EPA. 1996d. Addendum to: “Guidelines for the information management directory”, U. S. EPA, NHEERL, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI.
U. S. EPA. 1996e. Addendum to: “Guidelines for the information management catalog”, U. S. EPA, NHEERL, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI.
U.S. EPA. 1995. “Providing information to decision makers to protect human health and the environment”, Information Resources Management Strategic Plan. EPA-220-B-95–002. April 1995. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and Resources Management, Washington, DC.
Williams, N. 1997. “How to get databases talking the same language”, Science 275, 301–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hale, S.S. et al. (1998). Managing Scientific Data: The EMAP Approach. In: Sandhu, S., Jackson, L., Austin, K., Hyland, J., Melzian, B., Summers, K. (eds) Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6089-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4976-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive