Abstract
To an increasing extent governments all over the world are being called upon to work out and implement joint solutions to collective policy problems — ranging from the illegal production and distribution of drugs to global climate change. At least two propositions have been offered to account for the proliferation of international policy problems. One attributes this development to increases in the volume and ‘intensity’ of communication, transactions and exchanges of externalities across borders. The underlying assumption behind this line of explanation is that, other things being equal, the higher the volume of interaction between two societies, the more sensitive and vulnerable they tend to become towards each other (Keohane and Nye, 1977, 8 f). And the greater the interdependence between two actors, the more each of them will care about what the other does. An alternative proposition focuses on changes in the role of government, the basic argument being that as the scope of government intervention into society expands — as it has done throughout most of this century — new problems have been drawn into the sphere of public policy. To the extent that these problems have international ramifications, they may in turn also become topics of intergovernmental negotiations. The driving force, according to this hypothesis, is the expanding role of government in economic activities and social life rather than changes in the level or scope of interdependence among societies (Morse, 1973; Sundelius, 1984).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allison, G. T. (1971) Essence of Decision, Little, Brown & Co., Boston.
East, M. A. (1981) The organizational impact of interdependence on foreign policy-making: the case of Norway, in C. W. Kegley Jr and P. McGowan (eds.), The Political Economy of Foreign Policy Behavior, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
Goldmann, K. (1986) Democracy is incompatible with international politics: reconsideration of a hypothesis. Ch. 1, in K. Goldmann, S. Berglund and G. Sjöstedt (eds.), Democracy and Foreign Policy: The Case of Sweden, Gower, Aldershot.
Haas, P. M. (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization 1 (Winter), 1–36.
Jacobson, H. K. (1984) Networks of Interdependence. International Organizations and the Global Political System (second edition), Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Jacobson, H. K. and Brown Weiss, E. (1990) International lay and global change: a systematic study of national implementation and compliance with international environmental accords, Ms. Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1977) Power and Interdependence, Little, Brown & Co., Boston.
Mohr, E. (1990) International Environmental agreements. A research proposal, Kiel Institute of World Economics.
Morse, E. L. (1973) Foreign Policy and Interdependence in Gaullist France, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Odom, D. Jr. (1990) Swedish Foreign Policy Behavior, International Graduate School, Stockholm University (Stockholm International Studies, 90, 2), Slockholm.
Putnam, R. D. (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games, International Organization 42(3), 427–460.
Sand, P. H. (1990) Lessons learned in global environmental governance, World Resources Institute Publications Brief, June.
Sundelius, B. (1984) Interdependence, internationalization and foreign policy decentralization in Sweden, Cooperation and Conflict 19(2), 93–120.
Underdal, A. (1979) Issues determine politics determine policies, Cooperation and Conflict 14(1) 1–9.
Underdal, A. (1987) What’s left for the MFA? Foreign policy and the management of external relations in Norway, Cooperation and Conflict 22(3), 169–192.
Walton, R. E. and McKensie, R. B. (1965) A Behavioral Theory of labor Negotiations, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Weale, A. (1992) Implementation failure: a suitable case for review?, Ch. 3, in E. Lykke (ed.), Achieving Environmental Goals, Belhaven Press, London.
Wilson, J. Q. (1973) Political Organizations, Basic Books, New York.
Winham, G. R. (1979) Practitioners view of international negotiation, World Politics 32(1), 111–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanf, K., Underdal, A. (1998). Domesticating International Commitments: Linking National and International Decision-Making. In: Underdal, A. (eds) The Politics of International Environmental Management. European Science Foundation, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4946-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4946-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6075-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4946-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive