Skip to main content

Abstract

Although nobody seems to have recognized it at the time, 1953 was a banner year for duality theory, which in turn facilitated a veritable revolution in the application of consumer and producer theory some two decades later.1 Sten Malmquist (1953) and Ronald W. Shephard (1953) independently introduced the notion of a distance function (also called a gauge function and a transformation function2) to economists.3 In production theory, the (input) distance function is simply the maximal radial contraction (equivalently, the minimal radial expansion) of an input vector consistent with the technological feasibility of producing a given output vector. In utility theory, it is the maximal radial contraction (or minimal radial expansion) of a consumption vector consistent with the attainment of a particular utility level.

I am grateful to Rolf Färe, Shawna Grosskopf, Craig Gundersen, Marc Mecurio, and especially Bert Balk for many insightful comments on an earlier draft. As I have not always followed their advice, they bear no blame for the remaining inadequacies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality,” Journal of Economic Theory 2, 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balk, B. M. (1995), “Axiomatic Price Index Theory: A Survey,” International Statistical Review 63, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C, and D. Donaldson (1978), “Measures of Inequality and Their Meaning in Terms of Social Welfare,” Journal of Economic Theory 18, 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson (1980a), “A Theoretial Treatment of Indices of Absolute Inequality,” International Economic Review 21, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson (1980b), “Ethical Indices for the Measurement of Poverty,” Econometrica 48, 1053–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell (1976), “Functional Structure and the Allen Elasticities of Substitution: An Application of Duality Theory,” Review of Economic Studies 43, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell (1981), “The Morishima Elasticity of Substitution: Symmetry, Constancy, Separability, and Its Relationship to the Hicks and Allen Elasticities,” Review of Economic Studies 48, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell (1996), “Two-Stage Budgeting: An Extension of Gorman’s Theorem,” Economic Theory 9, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bol, G. (1986), “On Technical Efficiency Measures: A Remark,” Journal of Economic Theory 38, 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert (1982), “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity,” Econometrica 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G. (1996), “A New Look at Exact Input, Output, Productivity, and Technical Change Measurement,” Working Paper 96-05, Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Y. Chung, and R. Färe (1996), “Benefit and Distance Functions,” Journal of Economic Theory 70, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978), “Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 6, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson, and L. J. Lau (1973), “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers,” Review of Economics ans Statistics 65, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1978), “The Distance Function in Consumer Behaviour with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation,” Review of Economic Studies 45, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1981), “Optimal Taxes and the Structure of Preferences,” Econometrica 49, 1245–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951), “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization,” Econometrica, 19, 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1971), “An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production function,” Journal of Political Economy 79, 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1974), “Applications of Duality Theory,” in Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. 2, edited by M. Intriligator and D. Kendrick, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1976) “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers,” Journal of Econometrics 4, 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dmitruk, V., and G. A. Koshevoy (1991), “On the Existence of a Technical Efficiency Criterion,” Journal of Economic Theory 55, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, W., and J. Voeller (1976), Theory of the Price Index: Fisher’s Test Approach and Generalisations, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematics, Vol. 140, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and S. Grosskopf (1990), “A Distance Function Approach to Price Efficiency,” Journal of Political Economy 43, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell (1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and J. Nelson (1990), “On Price Efficiency,” International Economic Review 31, 709–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and C. A. K. Lovell (1978), “Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production,” Journal of Economic Theory 19, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., C. A. K. Lovell, and K. Zieschang (1983), “Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Multiple Output Production Technologies,” in Quantitative Studies in Production and Prices, edited by W. Eichhorn R. Henn, O. Opitz, and R. W. Shephard, Würzburg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and D. Primont (1995), Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (1922), The Making of Index Numbers, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, M., and D. McFadden (1978), Production Economics; A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. M. (1976), “Tricks with Utility Functions,” in Essays in Economic Analysis, edited by M. Artis and R. Nobay, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S., and R. R. Russell (1995), “Continuity and Duality,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 6, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G. (1978), “Symmetric Duality and Polar Production Functions, in Fuss and McFadden (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1932), “Edgeworth’s Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Supply and Demand Functions,” Journal of Political Economy 40, 557–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H. S. (1961), “The Present State of Consumption Theory.” Econometrica 29, 704–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konus, A.A. (1924), “The Problem of the True Index of the Cost of Living,” Econometrica 7, 10–29 (translation).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. J. (1951), “Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities,” Chapter 3 in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, edited by T. C. Koopmans, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1992), “Benefit Functions and Duality,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1995), Microeconomic Theory, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953), “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces,” Trabajos de Estatistica 4, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1978), “Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions,” in Fuss, M., and D. McFadden (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer, J. (1977), “Testing the Barten Model of Household Composition Effects and the Cost of Children,” Economic Journal 87, 460–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1971), “The Theory of the Cost of Living Index,” Research Discussion Paper, Office of Prices and Living Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C. In Price Level Measurement: Proceedings from a Conference Sponsered by Statistics Canada, edited by W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 1983. Reprinted in Price Level Measurement, Amsterdam: North-Holland, edited by W. E. Diewert, 1990, and in R. A. Pollak, The Theory of the Cost of Living Index, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primont, D., and C. Sawyer (1993), “Recovering the Production Technology from the Cost function,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. R. (1985), “Measures of Technical Efficiency,” Journal of Economic Theory 35, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. R. (1987), “On the Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Technical Efficiency,” in Measurement in Economics: Theory and Applications of Economic Indices, edited by W. Eichhorn, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. R. (1990), “Continuity of Measures of Technical Efficiency,” Journal of Economic Theory 51, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947), Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1950), “The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory,” Economica 17, 335–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1960), “Structure of a Minimum Equilibrium System,” in Essays in Economics and Econometrics, edited by R. W. Pfouts, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., (1996) “A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–1990),” in Proceedings of a Conference on New Uses of DEA, Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1953), Cost and Production Functions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production function,” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törnqvist, L. (1936), “The Bank of Finland’s Consumption Price Index,” Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin, No. 10, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1992), Microeconomic Analysis, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieschang, K. D. (1984), “An Extended Farrell Technical Efficiency Measure,” Journal of Economic Theory 33, 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, R.R. (1998). Distance Functions in Consumer and Producer Theory. In: Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Russell, R.R. (eds) Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4858-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4858-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6035-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4858-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics