Abstract
The recent development of new immunosuppressive agents may improve the overall results of organ transplantation and open new areas for clinical applications of allografts. The introduction of cyclosporin A 20 years ago brought drastic improvements in liver and heart transplantation, and these became routine treatment for irreversible hepatic or cardiac failure. New immuno-suppressors may have a comparable effect on lung, heart—lung and intestinal transplantation. However the whole clinical field of organ transplantation is moving: improvement in short-term results has led to such treatments being offered to ‘high-risk’ patients who were formerly excluded from transplantation: carefully designed clinical studies demonstrated that very young or elderly recipients, as well as diabetics or hyperimmunized patients could benefit from such treatments. Because of organ shortage, donors who were initially excluded for various reasons have finally become acceptable since cold ischemia time can be prolonged in kidney transplantation without major changes in failure rate.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pearson TC, Madsen JC, Larsen CP, Morris PJ, Wood KJ. Induction of transplantation tolerance in adults using donor antigen and anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Transplantation. 1992; 54: 475–483.
Genyk Y, Knight R, Burrows L. Should pediatric donors younger than 2 years of age be used in kidney transplantation? Transplant. Proc. 1997; 29: 3276–3277.
Banowsky LH, Lackner J, Kothmann R, Wright F. Results of single kidneys from donors aged 9 to 60 months: results in 144 adult recipients. Transplant. Proc. 1997; 29: 3271–3273.
Abdi R, Slakey D, Kittur D, Burkick J, Racusen L. Baseline glomerular size as a predictor of function in human renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1998; 66: 329–333.
Cosyns JP, Malaise J, Hanique G, Mourad M, Baldi A, Goebbels RM, Squifflet JP. Lesions in donor kidneys: nature, incidence, and influence on graft function. Transplant. Int. 1998; 11: 22–27.
Gaber LW, Moore LW, Alloway RR, Amiri MH, Vera SR, Gaber AO. Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 334–339.
Higgins RM, Sheriff R, Bittar AA, Richardson AJ, Ratcliffe PJ, Gray DWR, Morris PJ. The quality of function of renal allografts is associated with donor age. Transplant. Int. 1995; 8: 221–225.
Terasaki PI, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM, Takemoto S, Cho YW. Significance of the donor age effect on kidney transplants. Clin. Transplant. 1997; 11: 366–372.
Abonna GM. Marginal donors: a viable solution for organ shortage. Transplant. Proc. 1997; 29: 2759–2764.
Anil Kumar MS, Panigrahi D, Dezii CM et al. Long-term function and survival of elderly donor kidneys transplanted into young adults. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 282–285.
Sola R, Guirado LL, Lopez Navidad A et al. Renal transplantation with limit donors. Transplantation. 1998; 66: 1159–1163.
Connolly JK, Dyer PA, Martin S, Parrott NR, Pearson RC, Johnson RWG. Importance of minimizing HLA-DR mismatch and cold preservation time in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 709–714.
Robertson AJ, Morris PJ. Do re-grafts require more aggressive immunosuppression? Transplant. Clin. Immunol. 1997; 29: 109–119.
Neugarten J, Srinivas T, Tellis V, Silbiger S, Greenstein S. The effect of donor gender on renal allograft survival. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1996; 7: 318–324.
Miles AMV, Sumrani N, John S et al. The effect of kidney size on cadaveric renal allograft outcome. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 894–897.
Mirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, Vincenti F, Filo RS for the FK506 kidney transplant study group. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1997; 63: 977–83.
Mayer AD, Dmitrewski J, Squifflet JP et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in the prevention of renal allograft rejection. A report of the European tacrolimus multicenter renal study group. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 436–443.
Sollinger HN. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 225–232.
Halloran P, Mathew T, Tomlanovich S, Groth C, Hooftman L, Barker C for the international mycophenolate mofetil renal transplant study group. Mycophenolate mofetil in allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1997; 63: 39–47.
Gulanickar AC, McDonald AC. Sungertekin U, Belitsky P. The incidence and impact of early rejection episodes on graft outcome in recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants. Transplantation. 1992; 53: 323.
Pfaff WW, Howard RJ, Patton PR, Adams VR, Rosen CB, Reed AI. Delayed graft function after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 219–223.
Cosio FG, Pelletier RP, Falkenhain ME et al. Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival. Transplantation. 1997; 63: 1611–1615.
Solez K. Axelsen RA, Benekiktsson H et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int. 1993; 44: 411–422.
Newstead CG. Assessment of risk of cancer renal transplantation. Lancet. 1998; 351: 610–611.
Dantal J, Hourmant M, Cantarovitch D, Giral M, Blancho G, Dreno B, Soulillou JP. Effect of long-term immunosuppression in kidney-graft recipients on cancer incidence: randomised comparison of two cyclosporin regimens. Lancet. 1998; 351: 623–628.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Revillard, J.P., Pouteil-Noble, C., Cochat, P. (1999). Questions raised by the exclusion of ‘at risk’ conditions from current trials in organ transplantation. In: Cochat, P., Traeger, J., Merieux, C., Derchavane, M. (eds) Immunosuppression under Trial. Transplantation and Clinical Immunology, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5960-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4643-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive