Skip to main content

Economic analysis of immunosuppression in transplantation: a review of recent studies in liver and kidney transplantation

  • Chapter
Immunosuppression under Trial

Part of the book series: Transplantation and Clinical Immunology ((TRAC,volume 31))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

Organ transplantation has been widely recognized as the preferred approach, both clinically and economically, to the management of severe disease in several organs of the human body. In spite of the high initial cost of the surgical procedures the extensive patient benefits make such interventions a cost-effective use of health care resources. In many situations, such as chronic heart disease or liver failure, there is no other treatment which can ensure patient survival, so the benefit of transplantation comes in the form of years of life gained. In other organs, such as the kidney, alternative approaches exist which can prolong life. However, the quality of life of patients on dialysis can be much worse than for those with a successful transplant, so significant patient benefits come in the form of quality-adjusted life years which combine the gain in length and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klarman HF, Francis JO, Rosenthal CD. Cost-effectiveness analysis applied to the treatment of chronic renal diseases. Med. Care. 1968; 6: 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ludbrook A. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of chronic renal failure. App. Econ. 1981; 13: 340–350.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Evans RW. The socioeconomics of organ transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1985; 17 (Supp14): 129–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlberg I, Nyberg G. Cost-effectiveness studies of renal transplantation. Int. J. Tech. Ass. Health Care. 1995; 11: 611–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maynard AK. Developing the health care market. Econ. J. 1991; 101: 1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shield CF, McGrath MM, Gross TE Assessment of health-related quality of life in kidney transplant receiving tacrolimus (FK507) based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1738–1743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for peer reviewers and authors of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 1996; 313: 275–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, van Hout BA et al. Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 1997; 6: 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. European Tacrolimus Multi Centre Renal Study Group. Multicentre trial comparing tacrolimus (FK507) and cyclosporin in the prevention of renal allograft rejection: a report of the European Tacrolimus Multicentre Renal Study Group. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olivera D. Economic analysis of Prograf® (tacrolimus) and cyclosporin in the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. New Horizons Kidney Transplant. 1997; 1: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH et al. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporin for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1997; 63: 977–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neylan JF, FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group, Sullivan EM et al. An economic assessment of post-transplant hospitalisations among kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus versus cyclosporine immunosuppressive therapy. ASTP Meeting Orlando, Florida 11013 Dec, 1997. Abstracts No. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensik SC. Tacrolimus in Kidney transplantation: 3 year survival results of the US multicentre randomised comparative study. ASTP Meeting, Orlando, Florida 11–13 Dec 1997; Abstract No. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gjertson DW, Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. The relative effects of FK506 and cyclosporine on short-and long-term kidney graft survival. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 1384–1388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gjertson DW, Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. Long-term effect of Prograf on kidney graft survival. United Network for Organ Sharing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Booth-Clibborn N, Best L, Stein K. Tacrolimus after kidney transplantation. DEC Report No 74, NHS Executive South and West. R&D Directorate, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keown P, Lawen JG, Landsberg D et al. Economic analysis of Sandimmune Neoral in Canada in stable renal transplant patients. Transplant. Proc. 1995; 27: 1845–1848.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kingma I, Ludwin D, Dandavion R et al. Economic analysis of Neoral in de novo renal transplantation. Clin. Transplant. 1997; 11; 42–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abella I. Pharmacoeconomics of Neoral, a new formulation of cyclosporine, in renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1996; 28: 3131–3134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris-Stiff G, Richards T, Singh J et al. Phannacoeconomic study of FK506 (Prograf) and cyclosporine A (Neoral) in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1998; 30: 1285–1286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shield CF, Jacobs JR, Wyant S et al. A cost effectiveness analysis of OKT3 induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1996; 27: 855–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schommer JC, Pleil AM, Pathak DS. Two approaches to comparing hospital charges between cadaveric renal transplant patients who received OKT3 sterile solution or ATGAM sterile solution for induction therapy. Clin. Ther. 1995; 17: 749–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA, Baty JD et al. A pharmacoeconomic comparison of antithymocyte globulin and muromonab CD3 induction therapy in renal transplant recipients. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997; 11: 237–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, Best JH et al. The cost-effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in the first year after primary cadaveric transplant. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1997; 8: 1592–1598.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Keown P, Sullivan SD, Best JH et al. Economic evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prevention of acute graft rejection after cadaveric renal transplantation in Canada. ASTP Meeting Orlando, Florida 11–13 Dec 199. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Coukell AJ, Plasker GL. Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral): a pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998; 14: 691–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peeters P, Kazek M, Abella I et al. Economic evaluation of Neoral versus sandimmune maintenance therapy for de novo liver transplant patients: results from an international randomized controlled trial. Transplant. Proc. 1998; 30: 1838–1842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lake JR, Gorman KJ, Esquirel CO et al. A cost comparison of liver transplantation with FK506 and CyA as the primary immunosuppression agent. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 1089–1095.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. European FK506 Multicentre Liver Study Group. Randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in prevention of liver allograft rejection. Lancet. 1994; 344: 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McKenna M, Alexander G, Jones M, Hutton J. Economic analysis of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in prevention of liver allograft rejection. Eur. Hosp. Pharm. 1996; 2: 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Evans RG, Hart G, Manninen DL. A comparative assessment of the quality of life of successful kidney transplant patients according to source of graft. Transplant. Proc. 1994; 16: 1353.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hutton J. The economics of immunosuppression in renal transplantation: a review of recent literature. Transplant. Proc. 1999; 31: 1328–1332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

P. Cochat J. Traeger C. Merieux M. Derchavane

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutton, J. (1999). Economic analysis of immunosuppression in transplantation: a review of recent studies in liver and kidney transplantation. In: Cochat, P., Traeger, J., Merieux, C., Derchavane, M. (eds) Immunosuppression under Trial. Transplantation and Clinical Immunology, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5960-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4643-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics