Abstract
An unpleasant paradox has emerged in the second half of the century: More states than ever are signing international agreements to eliminate chemical and biological arms. Yet more are also suspected of developing these weapons despite the treaties. By 1995, 17 countries had been named as chemical and/or biological weapons suspects including Iran, Iraq, Russia, Bulgaria, Syria, Israel, Egypt, Libya, North Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, India, South Korea, South Africa and China. (The first five of these countries constitute the five out of six neighbors of our country, Turkey!)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hincal, F., Celyker, A., Hincal, A.A. (1999). Are the Civilians Prepared for Chemical and/or Biological Warfare? The Need of a Cooperative Effort for a Simple Guideline. In: Sohns, T., et al. NBC Risks Current Capabilities and Future Perspectives for Protection. NATO Science Series, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4641-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4641-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5803-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4641-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive