Faith and Reason in the thought of Moise Amyraut

  • Desmond M. Clarke
Part of the Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARCH, volume 163)


Disagreements about biblical interpretation in the seventeenth century derived from a variety of sources, including the following: the distinction between canonical and apocryphal texts, the literalness or otherwise with which texts should be understood, the choice of translations and, fundamentally, the role of reason and authority, especially the authority of churches, in interpreting the Scriptures. Moise Amyraut (1596-1664) addressed the last of these issues in a number of writings and provided an interesting Calvinist response to a cluster of epistemological questions which confronted both theologians and philosophers at the time.1 In examining Amyraut’s account of the role of faith and reason in religious belief, it is helpful to compare it with the views popularly presented by Cartesian contemporaries in the name of the Roman Catholic tradition and to discuss the extent to which both views can be usefully called ‘rationalist’.


Seventeenth Century Religious Faith Human Reason Human Understanding Christian Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Desmond M. Clarke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations