Skip to main content

A General Reasoning Scheme for Underspecified Representations

  • Chapter
Logic, Language and Reasoning

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 5))

Abstract

Underspecified semantic representations have attracted increasing interest within computational linguistics. Several formalisms have been developed that allow to represent sentence or text meanings with that degree of specificity that is determined by the context of interpretation. As the context changes they must allow for (partial) disambiguation steps performed by a process of refinement that goes hand in hand with the construction algorithm. And as the interpretation of phrases often1 relies on deductive principles and thus any construction algorithm must be able to integrate the results of deductive processes, any semantic formalism should be equipped with a deductive component that operates directly on its semantic forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hiyan Alshawi, editor. The Core Language Engine. ACL-MIT Press Series in Natural Languages Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hiyan Alshawi and Richard Crouch. Monotonic semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 32–39, Newark, Delaware, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robin Cooper, Dick Crouch, Jan van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef van Genabith, Jan Jaspars, Hans Kamp, Manfred Pinkal, Massimo Poesio, and Steve Pulman. Building the framework. Deliverable 15, FraCaS, LRE 62-051, University of Edinburgh, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robin Cooper, Dick Crouch, Jan van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef van Genabith, Jan Jaspars, Hans Kamp, Manfred Pinkal, Massimo Poesio, Steve Pulman, and Espen Vestre. Describing the approaches. Deliverable 8, FraCaS, LRE 62-051, University of Edinburgh, 1994. URL: ftp://ftp.cogsci.ed.ac.uk /pub/FRACAS/de18.ps.gz.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ann Copestake, Dan Flickinger, Rob Malouf, Susanne Riehemann, and Ivan A. Sag. Translation using minimal recursion semantics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, University of Leuven, Belgium, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Crouch. Ellipsis and quantification: A substitutional approach. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, European Chapter, Dublin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mary Dalrymple, John Lamping, Fernando C.N. Pereira, and Vijay Saraswat. A deductive account of quantification in LFG. In Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher J. Pinon, and Henriette de Swart, editors, Quantifiers, Deduction and Context. CSLI, Stanford, Ca., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David R. Dowty, Robert E. Wall, and Stanley Peters. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anette Frank and Uwe Reyle. Principle based semantics for HPSG. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, European Chapter, Dublin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jerry Hobbs and Stuart M. Shieber. An algorithm for generating quantifier scopings. Computational Linguistics, 13: 47–63, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin Kay. Machine translation. Lecture Notes, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, University of Stuttgart, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William R. Keller. Nested cooper storage: the proper treatment of quantification in ordinary noun phrases. In Uwe Reyle and Rohrer Christian, editors, Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories, pages 432–437. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernando C.N. Pereira. Categorial semantics and scoping. Computational Linguistics, 16 (1): 1–10, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag. Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uwe Reyle. Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: Construction, representation, and deduction. Journal of Semantics, 10 (2): 123–179, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uwe Reyle. On reasoning with ambiguities. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, European Chapter, Dublin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

König, E., Reyle, U. (1999). A General Reasoning Scheme for Underspecified Representations. In: Ohlbach, H.J., Reyle, U. (eds) Logic, Language and Reasoning. Trends in Logic, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4574-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4574-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5936-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4574-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics