Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASEN2,volume 54))

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

In field studies biomarker assays can provide evidence of exposure of vertebrates to environmental chemicals, and sometimes also of consequent harmful effects. Appropriate combinations of assays can measure the sequence of changes which lead to the appearance of overt symptoms of toxicity; they can record changes at different organisational levels, ranging from the molecular, through the cellular, to effects upon the whole organism (physiological and behavioural). Assays that only require non destructive sampling have two major advantages, one scientific the other ethical. From the scientific viewpoint they can be based on serial sampling of individuals, thereby eliminating the problem of interindividual variations in the parameters that are measured. From the ethical point of view, there is growing opposition to testing procedures that cause suffering or death to vertebrate animals. Samples of blood, faeces or eggs can be taken without causing distress. Biomarker responses which are closely related to toxicity (eg those based upon the actual mechanism of toxicity) are of particular interest. They can give an integrated measure of the toxic effect of mixtures of compounds acting through the same mechanism (eg in the case of planar organohalogen compounds displaying Ah receptor - mediated toxicity), thus offering a way of approaching one of the most difficult problems in ecotoxicology. A major challenge is linking biomarker responses to consequent effects at the level of population and above. The success in linking eggshell thinning caused by DDE to the decline of certain raptor populations has demonstrated the potential of this approach. However much work needs to be done to make it more widely applicable. With the rapid advance of biochemical toxicology there is an excellent prospect for the development of new `user friendly’ assays to aid environmental risk assessment of vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Walker, C.H., Hopkin, S.P., Sibly, R.M. and Peakall, D.B. (1996)Principles of EcotoxicologyTaylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy, J.F., and Shugart, L.R. (eds.), (1990)Biomarkers of Environmental ContaminationLewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peakall, D.B. (1992)Animal Biomarkers as Pollution IndicatorsChapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Huggett, R.J., Kimerle, R.A., Mehrle, P.M. and Bergman, H.L., (eds) (1992)Biomarkers. Biochemical Phsiological and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic StressLewis, Boca Raton, FI.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peakall, D.B. and Shugart, L.R. (eds.) (1993)Biomarker Research and Application in the Assessment of Environmental HealthSpringer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peakall, D.B. and Walker, C.H. (1994) The Role of Biomarkers in Environmental Risk Assessment (3) Vertebrates.Ecotoxicology 3173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fossi, M.C. and Leonzio, C. (eds.) (1994)Non-destructive Biomarkers in VertebratesLewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walker, C.H. (1998) Biomarker Strategies to Evaluate the Environmental Fate of ChemicalsEnvironmental Health Perspect.106(Suppl. 2), 613–620.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker, C.H. (1996) Biomarkers and Risk AssessmentPesticide Outlook 77–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Depledge, M.H., and Fossi, M.C. (1994) The Role of Biomarkers in Risk Assessment (2) invertebrates.Ecotoxicology 3161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grue, C.E., Hart, A.D.M. and Mineau, P. (1991) Biological consequences of depressed brain cholinesterase activity in wildlife in P. Mineau (ed.)Cholinesterase-inhibiting Insecticides - Their Impact on wildlife and the EnvironmentElsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 151–210.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, C.H. (1998) The use of biomarkers to measure the interactive effects of chemicals.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety40, 65–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwer, A. (1996) Biomarkers for exposure (and effect) assessment of dioxins and PCBs in Use of Biomarkers in Exposure assessment, report R5. IEH report published by Medical Research Council, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garrison, P.K., Tullis, K., Aaarts, J.M.M., Brouwer, A., Giesy, J.P. and Dennison, M.S. (1996) Species specific cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of TCDD-like chemicals.Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 30194–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mineau, P. (1991)Cholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides - Their Impact on Wildlife and the EnvironmentElsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez, J.C., Fossi, M.C. and Focardi, S. (1997) Serum B esterases as a non destructive biomarker in the lizardGallotia gallotiexperimentally treated with parathionEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry 161954–1961.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fossi, M.C., Sanchez, J.C. and Gaggi, C. (1995) The lizardGallotia galloti asa biomarker of organophosphorous contamination in the Canary IslandsEnvironmental Pollution 87289–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Livingstone, D.R. and Stegeman, J.J. (1998) Forms and Functions of Cytochrome P450 Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology.Special issue, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahlborg, U.G., Becking, G.C., Birnbaum, L.S., Brouwer, A., Derks, H., Feeley, M., Golor, G., Hanberg, A., Larsen, J.C., Liem, A.K.D., Safe, S.H., Schletter, C., Waern, F., Younes, M. and Yrjanheikki, E. (1994)Toxic Equivalency factors for Dioxin-like PCBs Chemosphere 281049–1065.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shugart, L. (1994) Genotoxic responses in blood in M.C. Fossi. and C. Leonzio (eds)Non-destructive Biomarkers in Vertebrates.Lewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Savva, D. (1996) DNA fingerprinting as a biomarker assay in ecotoxicology.Ecotoxicology and Ecotoxicology News 3110–114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, H.M. and Walker, C.H. (1994) Blood esterases as indicators of exposure to organophosphorous and carbamate insecticides in M.C. Fossi and C. Leonzio (eds.)Non-destructive Biomarkers in Vertebrates.Lewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khattab, A.D., Walker, C.H., Johnston, G.O., Siddiqui, M.K. and Saphier, P.W. (1994). An ELISA assay for avian serum butyrylcholinesterase: a biomarker for organophosphates.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 131661–1668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson J.B. (1994) The biochemical toxicology of serum carboxylesterases in the pigeon(Columba livia)PhD thesis, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hamulyak, K., Thijssen, H.H.W. and Vermeer, C. (1994) Effects of coumanrin derivatives on coagulation proteinsHuman and Experimental Toxicology 13(a), 631.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brouwer, A., Reijnders, P.J.H. and Koeman, J.H. (1989) PCB contaminated fish induce vitamin A and thyroid deficiency in the common seal(Phoca vitulina) Aquatic Toxicology 1599–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brouwer, A., Murk, A.J. and Koeman, J.H. (1990) Biochemical and physiological approaches in ecotoxicologyFunctional Ecology 4275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aguilar, A., and Borrell, A. (1994) Assessment of Organochlorine Pollutants in cetaceans by means of skin and hypodermic biopsies in M.C. Fossi and C. Leonzio (eds.)Non-destructive Biomarkers in VertebratesLewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tillett, D.E., Ankley, G.T., Verbrugge, D.A., Giesy, J.P., Ludwig, J.P. and Kubiak, T.J. (1991) H411E rat hepatoma cell bioassay-derived 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalent in colonial fish-eating waterbird birds eggs from the Great LakesArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2191–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. De Matteis F. and Lim, C.K. (1994) Porphyrins as non-destructive bioindicators of exposure to environmental pollutants, in M.C. Fossi and C. Leonzio (eds.)Non-destructive biomarkes in VertebratesLewis, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nicholson, J.K. (1994) N.M.R.spectroscopy and pattern recognition as approaches to the detection of novel molecular markers of toxicityHuman and Experimental Toxicology13(Abstract), 630.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grosnik, B.E. and Goksoyr, A. (1996) Biomarker protein expression in primary cultures of salmon hepatocytes exposed to environmental pollutantsBiomarkers 145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sumpter, J.P. and Jobling, S.,(1995) Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for oestrogenic contamination of the aquatic environmentEnvironmental Health Perspectives 103173–178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker, C., Kaiser, K., Klein, W., Lagadic, L., Peakall, D., Sheffield, S., Soldan, T. and Yasuno, M. (1998) Alternative Testing Methodologies for EcotoxicologyEnviron. Health Perspectives 106(Suppl. 2), 441–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, C.H. (1999). The Use of Biomarkers in Vertebrates. In: Peakall, D.B., Walker, C.H., Migula, P. (eds) Biomarkers: A Pragmatic Basis for Remediation of Severe Pollution in Eastern Europe. NATO Science Series, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4550-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4550-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5644-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4550-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics