Abstract
To date, Language Awareness and the evaluation of academic writing have focused primarily on learners and how their awareness of language can help them achieve better results in their writing for the academy. Only secondarily have researchers asked how assessors’ awareness of language might affect evaluations of academic writing. Since ‘language awareness’ has been thought to raise’ sensitivity to and conscious awareness’ of language in action (van Lier, 1991, p. 532; citing Donmall, 1985), and since it has been seen as ‘a means to bridge the consciousness gap within the individual’ (James & Garrett, 1991, p. 5), one can consider research on writing assessors’ evaluation practices as an attempt to gauge assessors’ sensitivity and consciousness to language and its variation. To that end, the research in this area can be seen as attempts to answer the following questions: What factors influence writing assessors? How and why do these factors influence them? Are they aware of language and language variation? Are they aware of language’s effects on their judgements?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balboni, P.E.: 1993, ‘Language awareness in the national curriculum for language education for Italy’, Language Awareness 2, 187–192.
Balester, V.M.: 1991, ‘Hyperfluency and the growth of linguistic resources’, Language and Education 5, 81–94.
Balester, V.M.: 1993, Cultural Divide: A Study of African-American College-Level Writers, Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth NH.
Brumfit, C.J.: 1980, Problems and Principles in English Teaching, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Brumfit, C.J.: 1991, ‘Language awareness in teacher education’, in C. James & P. Garrett (eds.), Language Awareness in the Classroom. Applied Linguistics and Language Study series, C. N. Candlin (general ed.), Longman, London and New York, 24–39.
Candelier, M.: 1992, ‘Language awareness and language policy in the European context: A French point of view’, Language Awareness 1, 27–32.
Chandler, P., Robinson, W. P. & Noyes, P.: 1988, ‘The level of linguistic knowledge and awareness amongst students training to be primary teachers’, Language and Education 2, 161–173.
Corson, D.: 1995, Using English Words, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Crawshaw, R.: 1984, ‘Information, awareness and context as factors in foreign language learning’, British Journal of Language Teaching 22, 67–73.
Dannequin, C.: 1987, ‘Les enfants baillonnés (gagged children): The teaching of French as mother tongue in elementary school’, Language and Education 1, 15–31.
Diederich, P.B.: 1964, ‘Problems and possibilities of research in the teaching of written composition’, in D.H. Russell, E.J. Farrell, M.J. Early, D.V. Gunderson, R. Braddock & J. R. Squire (eds.), Research Design and the Teaching of English: Proceedings of the San Francisco Conference 1963, National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign IL, 52–73.
Diederich, P.B.: 1974, Measuring Growth in English, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana IL.
Diederich, P.B., French, J.W. & Carlton, S.T.: 1961, Factors in Judgments of Writing Ability, Research Bulletin RB-61–15, Educational Testing Service, Princeton NJ.
Donmall, B.G. (ed.): 1985, Language Awareness: National Council for Language in Education Reports and Papers, 6, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, London, 132–142.
Evans, P.J.A. (ed.): 1985, Directions and Misdirections in English Evaluation, Canadian Council of Teachers of English, Ottawa.
Freedman, S.W.: 1979, ‘How characteristics of student essays influence teachers’ evaluations’, Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 328–338.
Graves, M.F.: 1986, ‘Vocabulary learning and instruction’, Review of Research in Education 13, 58–89.
Grobe, C.H.: 1981, ‘Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings’, Research in the Teaching of English 15, 75–85.
Hake, R.L. & Williams, J.M.: 1981, ‘Style and its consequences: Do as I do, not as I say’, College English 43, 433–451.
Hargan, N.: 1995, ‘Misguided expectations: EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Italian university students’ written work’, Language and Education 9, 223–232.
Harris, W.H.: 1977, ‘Teacher response to student writing: A study of the response patterns of high school English teachers to determine the basis for teacher judgment of student writing’, Research in the Teaching of English 11, 175–185.
Hawkins, E.W.: 1987, Modern Languages in the Curriculum (revised edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
James, C. & Garrett, P.: 1991, ‘The scope of language awareness’, in C. James & P. Garrett (eds.), Language Awareness in the Classroom, Applied Linguistics and Language Study series, C.N. Candlin (general ed.), Longman, London and New York, 3–20.
Krater, J., Zeni, J. & Cason, N. D.: 1994, Mirror Images: Teaching Writing in Black and White, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH.
Maylath, B.A.R.: 1996, ‘Words make a difference: The effects of greco-latinate and Anglo-Saxon variation on college writing instructors’, Research in the Teaching of English 30, 220–247.
Mittins, W. H.: 1991, Language Awareness for Teachers, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, and Philadelphia PA.
Neal, H.M.: 1996, Hyperfluency, Academic Register, and the Acquisition of Academic Discourse, Unpublished manuscript.
Piché, G.L., Michlin, M.L., Rubin, D.L. & Sullivan, A.: 1977, ‘Effects of dialect-ethnicity, social class and quality of written compositions on teachers’ subjective evaluations of children’, Communication Monographs 44, 60–72.
Piché, G.L., Rubin, D.L., Turner, L.J. & Michlin, M.L.: 1978, ‘Teachers’ subjective evaluations of standard and black nonstandard English compositions: A study of written language and attitudes’, Research in the Teaching of English 12, 107–118.
Quinn, T.J. & Trounce, M.: 1985, ‘Some aspects of Australian experience with language awareness courses’, in B.G. Donmall (ed.), Language Awareness: National Council for Language in Education Reports and Papers, 6, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, London, 132–142.
Remondino, C.: 1959, ‘A factorial analysis of the evaluation of scholastic compositions in the mother tongue’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 29, 242–251.
Sloan, G.: 1978, ‘Predilections for plethoric prose’, College English 39, 860–865.
Stewart, M.F. & Grobe, C.H.: 1979, ‘Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing and teachers’ quality ratings’, Research in the Teaching of English 13, 207–215.
van Lier, L.: 1991, ‘Language awareness: The common ground between linguist and language teacher’, in J.E. Alatis (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguisitics 1991, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, 528–546.
Williams, J.L.: 1975, ‘Nominal and verbal styles: Some affective consequences’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 8.2,63. (Presented as a conference paper at the 1975 Midwest Modern Language Association convention, 7 November, Chicago IL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maylath, B. (1997). Assessors’ Language Awareness in the Evaluation of Academic Writing. In: Van Lier, L., Corson, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4933-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4533-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive