Skip to main content

Assessors’ Language Awareness in the Evaluation of Academic Writing

  • Chapter
Encyclopedia of Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((LANG,volume 6))

  • 460 Accesses

Abstract

To date, Language Awareness and the evaluation of academic writing have focused primarily on learners and how their awareness of language can help them achieve better results in their writing for the academy. Only secondarily have researchers asked how assessors’ awareness of language might affect evaluations of academic writing. Since ‘language awareness’ has been thought to raise’ sensitivity to and conscious awareness’ of language in action (van Lier, 1991, p. 532; citing Donmall, 1985), and since it has been seen as ‘a means to bridge the consciousness gap within the individual’ (James & Garrett, 1991, p. 5), one can consider research on writing assessors’ evaluation practices as an attempt to gauge assessors’ sensitivity and consciousness to language and its variation. To that end, the research in this area can be seen as attempts to answer the following questions: What factors influence writing assessors? How and why do these factors influence them? Are they aware of language and language variation? Are they aware of language’s effects on their judgements?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balboni, P.E.: 1993, ‘Language awareness in the national curriculum for language education for Italy’, Language Awareness 2, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balester, V.M.: 1991, ‘Hyperfluency and the growth of linguistic resources’, Language and Education 5, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balester, V.M.: 1993, Cultural Divide: A Study of African-American College-Level Writers, Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfit, C.J.: 1980, Problems and Principles in English Teaching, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfit, C.J.: 1991, ‘Language awareness in teacher education’, in C. James & P. Garrett (eds.), Language Awareness in the Classroom. Applied Linguistics and Language Study series, C. N. Candlin (general ed.), Longman, London and New York, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candelier, M.: 1992, ‘Language awareness and language policy in the European context: A French point of view’, Language Awareness 1, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., Robinson, W. P. & Noyes, P.: 1988, ‘The level of linguistic knowledge and awareness amongst students training to be primary teachers’, Language and Education 2, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corson, D.: 1995, Using English Words, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawshaw, R.: 1984, ‘Information, awareness and context as factors in foreign language learning’, British Journal of Language Teaching 22, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannequin, C.: 1987, ‘Les enfants baillonnés (gagged children): The teaching of French as mother tongue in elementary school’, Language and Education 1, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, P.B.: 1964, ‘Problems and possibilities of research in the teaching of written composition’, in D.H. Russell, E.J. Farrell, M.J. Early, D.V. Gunderson, R. Braddock & J. R. Squire (eds.), Research Design and the Teaching of English: Proceedings of the San Francisco Conference 1963, National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign IL, 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, P.B.: 1974, Measuring Growth in English, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, P.B., French, J.W. & Carlton, S.T.: 1961, Factors in Judgments of Writing Ability, Research Bulletin RB-61–15, Educational Testing Service, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmall, B.G. (ed.): 1985, Language Awareness: National Council for Language in Education Reports and Papers, 6, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, London, 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.J.A. (ed.): 1985, Directions and Misdirections in English Evaluation, Canadian Council of Teachers of English, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S.W.: 1979, ‘How characteristics of student essays influence teachers’ evaluations’, Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M.F.: 1986, ‘Vocabulary learning and instruction’, Review of Research in Education 13, 58–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobe, C.H.: 1981, ‘Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings’, Research in the Teaching of English 15, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R.L. & Williams, J.M.: 1981, ‘Style and its consequences: Do as I do, not as I say’, College English 43, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargan, N.: 1995, ‘Misguided expectations: EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Italian university students’ written work’, Language and Education 9, 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W.H.: 1977, ‘Teacher response to student writing: A study of the response patterns of high school English teachers to determine the basis for teacher judgment of student writing’, Research in the Teaching of English 11, 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, E.W.: 1987, Modern Languages in the Curriculum (revised edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. & Garrett, P.: 1991, ‘The scope of language awareness’, in C. James & P. Garrett (eds.), Language Awareness in the Classroom, Applied Linguistics and Language Study series, C.N. Candlin (general ed.), Longman, London and New York, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krater, J., Zeni, J. & Cason, N. D.: 1994, Mirror Images: Teaching Writing in Black and White, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maylath, B.A.R.: 1996, ‘Words make a difference: The effects of greco-latinate and Anglo-Saxon variation on college writing instructors’, Research in the Teaching of English 30, 220–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittins, W. H.: 1991, Language Awareness for Teachers, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, and Philadelphia PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, H.M.: 1996, Hyperfluency, Academic Register, and the Acquisition of Academic Discourse, Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piché, G.L., Michlin, M.L., Rubin, D.L. & Sullivan, A.: 1977, ‘Effects of dialect-ethnicity, social class and quality of written compositions on teachers’ subjective evaluations of children’, Communication Monographs 44, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piché, G.L., Rubin, D.L., Turner, L.J. & Michlin, M.L.: 1978, ‘Teachers’ subjective evaluations of standard and black nonstandard English compositions: A study of written language and attitudes’, Research in the Teaching of English 12, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T.J. & Trounce, M.: 1985, ‘Some aspects of Australian experience with language awareness courses’, in B.G. Donmall (ed.), Language Awareness: National Council for Language in Education Reports and Papers, 6, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, London, 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondino, C.: 1959, ‘A factorial analysis of the evaluation of scholastic compositions in the mother tongue’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 29, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, G.: 1978, ‘Predilections for plethoric prose’, College English 39, 860–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M.F. & Grobe, C.H.: 1979, ‘Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing and teachers’ quality ratings’, Research in the Teaching of English 13, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L.: 1991, ‘Language awareness: The common ground between linguist and language teacher’, in J.E. Alatis (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguisitics 1991, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, 528–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.L.: 1975, ‘Nominal and verbal styles: Some affective consequences’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 8.2,63. (Presented as a conference paper at the 1975 Midwest Modern Language Association convention, 7 November, Chicago IL).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maylath, B. (1997). Assessors’ Language Awareness in the Evaluation of Academic Writing. In: Van Lier, L., Corson, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4933-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4533-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics