Advertisement

Solar Wind Correlations: Using a Solar Wind Monitor Successfully

  • K. I. Paularena
  • J. D. Richardson
  • G. N. Zastenker
  • P. A. Dalin
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (ASIC, volume 537)

Abstract

Solar wind plasma correlations between data from three spacecraft — IMP 8, INTERBALL-1, and WIND — are analyzed for periods near the most recent solar minimum. There are two primary foci of this study: 1) to understand the physics underlying good and poor correlation periods, and 2) to investigate and quantify the degree to which distant solar wind plasma measurements (such as those from near Earth’s L1 point) represent the solar wind affecting the magnetosheath and magnetosphere.

The correlations are examined as a function of the positional separations (in GSE) of the spacecraft, the average flux, speed, and density of the solar wind, the standard deviations of those parameters, and the lags that give the maximum correlation. The character of the correlation behavior (i.e., what percentage of the time good or poor correlations are observed) appears to be dependent on X-separation past some distance (~ 220 R E )which may be dependent on solar cycle timing. There appear to be no strong dependencies on Y-separation or on speed, but some dependence on the flux and density magnitudes and the dependence on their standard deviations is especially strong.

Keywords

Solar Wind Solar Cycle Interplanetary Magnetic Field Solar Wind Plasma Solar Wind Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paularena, K.I., Zastenker, G.N., Lazarus, A.J. and Dalin, P.A. (1998) Solar wind plasma correlations between IMP 8, INTERBALL-1 and WIND, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,601–14,617.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richardson, J.D., Dashevskiy, F. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) Solar wind plasma correlations between L1 and Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,619–14,629.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zastenker, G.N., Dalin, P.A., Lazarus, A.J. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) Comparison of solar wind parameters measured simultaneously by several spacecraft, Cosmic Research, 36, 214–225. Also Kosmich. Issled. On Russian), 36, 228–240.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson, J.D. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) The orientation of plasma structure in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2097–2100.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collier, M.R., Slavin, J.A., Lepping, R.P., Szabo, A., and Ogilvie, K. (1998) Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2509–2512.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King, J.H. (1982) Availability of IMP-7 and IMP-8 data for the IMS period, in C.T. Russell and D.J. Southwood (eds.) The IMS Source Book, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp. 10–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, S C and Nishida, A. (1973) Spatial structure of transverse oscillations in the interplanetary magnetic field Astrophys. Sp. Sci. 23, 301–314 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell, C.T., Siscoe, G.L. and Smith, E.J. (1980)Comparison of ISEE-1 and -3 interplanetary magnetic field observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 381–384.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crooker, N.U., Siscoe, G.L., Russell, C.T., and Smith, E.J. (1982) Factors controlling degree of correlation between ISEE 1 and ISEE 3 interplanetary magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 2224–2230.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paularena, K.I. and Lazarus, A.J. (1994) Comment on “Intercalibration of solar wind instruments during the international magnetospheric study” by S.M. Petrinec and C.T. Russell, J. Geophys. Res. 99 14,777–14,778.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bellomo, A. and Mavretic, A. (1978) Description of the MIT plasma experiment on IMP 7/8, Rep. CSR TR-78–2, 51 pp., Cent. for Space Res., Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogilvie, K.W., et al., (1995) SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sei. Rev. 71, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Šafránková, J., et al. (1997) Small scale observations of magnetopause motion: Preliminary results of the INTERBALL project, Ann. Geophys. 15, 562–569.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. I. Paularena
    • 1
  • J. D. Richardson
    • 1
  • G. N. Zastenker
    • 2
  • P. A. Dalin
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Space ResearchMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Space Research InstituteRASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations