Skip to main content
  • 532 Accesses

Abstract

Barren in this context indicates the complete lack of female organs, not just flowers, but the absolute lack of even female (ear) initials in the maize plant. There are at least 5 non-allelic genes in maize that when mutated cause barrenness. This has been verified by extensive allelic tests. The phenotype of each of these genes is generally similar in the female part of the plant. There is a phenotypic change in the tassel, that is quite obvious in the plants in the field, though admittedly, this has not been exhaustively verified by sufficient out crossing. Most any maize geneticist or breeder that is familiar with plants in the maize genetic or breeding nursery has observed the relationship of the maturing male and female components in the plants. In almost every case (there are occasional exceptions) the male flowering and pollen-shed occurs before the female begins silking. The gap between the two events varies, from 1 day to almost the end of the pollen-shedding period. It has been anecdotally assumed that hormones in the tassel control the initiation of female activity. The tassel appears to repress the female receptivity (silking) until the pollen shedding begins. This is only anecdotal and the necessary experiments have not been made to clearly show this relationship. There are mutants that vary this process but these have not been coupled with physiological investigations. Though the ba4 mutant arose in a transposon plot, the necessary molecular confirmation of this mutant has not confirmed a transposon insert. The behavior of this mutant illustrates some interesting features. The mutant expression is characterized by plants that are typically barren. The barren plants are unilaterally susceptible to anthracnose. In a segregating row, only the barren plants show anthracnose disease symptoms. The factor that is deficient and causes barrenness is suggestive that the mutant effect makes the plant susceptible to anthracnose infection. This mutant is predominantly recessive but not entirely. In crosses of these barren (obviously, as male) on to assorted wild type plants (+/+ x ba4/ba4), there is a low frequency of “escapes”, that is, plants are ba4 and barren. But not entirely, because late, after the tassel has been fully spent, even dried, and probably 30 days, a small deformed ear appears on the very last leaf, very low in the plant. Hypothesis on ba4: That a hormone is suppressing ear formation and thus barrenness. When the plant is nearing senescence, the hormone is depleted and the ear initial finally becomes evident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baba, T. and Yamazaki, K. (1996) Effects of phase transition on the development of lateral buds in maize, Crop Sci. 36, 1574–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnett, O.T. (1940) Development of the staminate and pistillate inflorescences of sweet corn, J. Agric. Res. 60, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnett, O.T. (1948) Ear and tassel development in maize, Annual Missouri Botany Garden 35, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnett, O.T. (1953) Developmental morphology of the vegetative and floral shoots of maize, University of Illinois Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 568.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnett, O.T. (1966) Inflorescences of maize, wheat, rye, barley, and oats: Their initiation and development, University of Illinois Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 721.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, P.C., Greyson, R.I. and Waiden, D.B. (1983) Organ initiation and the development of unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays maize, structure, Am. J. Bot. 70, 450–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, S.E., Running, M.P. and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1995) CLA VATA3 is a specific regulator of shoot and floral meristem development affecting the same processes as CLAVATAI, Development 121, 2057–2067.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coe, E.H., Jr. and Neuffer, M.G. (1977) Cells in the embryo and their destinies in tassel, ear and vegetable parts (maize), Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 51, 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeLong, A., Calderon-Urrea, A. and Dellaporta, S.L (1993) Sex determination gene Tasselseed2 of maize encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion, Cell 74, 757–768.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott, R.C., Betzner, A.S., Huttner, E., Oakes, M.P., Tucket, W.Q.J., et al. (1996) AINTEGUMENTA, an APETALA2-like gene of Arabidopsis with pleiotropic roles in ovule development and floral organ growth, Plant Cell 8, 155–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmeyr, J.D.J. (1930) The inheritance and linkage relationships of barrenstalk-1 and barrenstalk-2, two mature plant characters of maize, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lejeune, P. and Bernier, G. (1996) Effect of environment on the early steps of ear initiation in maize (Zea mays L.), Plant, Cell Environ. 19, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McDaniel, C.N. and Poethig, R.S. (1989) From here to there in maize: A fate map of the shoot apical meristem of the germinating corn embryo, in R. Goldberg (ed.), Molecular Basis of Plant Development, Liss, New York, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyerowitz, E.M. (1998) Molecular and genetic mechanisms of shoot meristem activity: Plant architectural engineering, 18th International Congress of Genetics (Abstracts), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, Y.B. and Peterson, P.A. (1992) ba3: A new barrenstalk mutant in Zea mays L, J. Genetics and Breeding 46, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poethig, R.S. (1988) Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize, Genetics 119, 959–973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peterson, P.A. (1999). Barren Mutants in Maize-A Case Study in Plant Signaling. In: Kanellis, A.K., Chang, C., Klee, H., Bleecker, A.B., Pech, J.C., Grierson, D. (eds) Biology and Biotechnology of the Plant Hormone Ethylene II. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4453-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4453-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5910-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4453-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics