Skip to main content

LCA: Comparison Between Recycle and Reuse of Glass Beer Bottles

  • Chapter
Tools and Methods for Pollution Prevention

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASEN2,volume 62))

Abstract

This work compares the life cycles of returnable and non-returnable beer bottles. The methodology, principles and framework adopted are those proposed by SETAC’s working group. The “Critical Dilution Volume” method is used to evaluate the inventory data and perform the environmental impact assessment. The inventory data was obtained from two Portuguese industries and compared with the BUWAL database. The differences between returnable and one-way beer bottles were analysed and show that recycling of glass bottles provides larger environmental benefits than reuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BUWAL (1991) Inventaires Écologiques Relatifs aux Emballages Cahier de L’environnment No 123, Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests and Landscape, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BUWAL (1997) Inventaires Écologiques Relatifs aux Emballages, Cahier de L’environnment No 250/I et No 250/II, Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests and Landscape, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Consoli, F.; Allen, D.; Bousted, I.; Fava, J.; Franklin, W. et al. (1993) Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practice, SETAC, Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EC/62/1994 Council Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habersatter, K. (1991) Ecobalance of Packaging Materials State of 1990, Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests and Landscape, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Standard TC207/SC5/DIS14040 (1997) International Organization for Standardisation, Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen et al. (1997) Life Cycle Assessment — a Guide to Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources, Report to the European Environmental Agency Concerning Service Contract No. 300/SERl9600235/96/gbl.lca, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kooijman, J. (1993) Environmental Assessment of Packaging: Sense and Sensibility, Packaging Technology & Science, 17, p.575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kooijman, J. (1994) Environmental Assessment of Food Packaging: Impact and Improvement, Packaging Technology & Science, 7, p.111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kooijman, J. (1996) The Environmental Impact of Packaging Performance in the Food Supply System, Journal of Waste Management & Resource Recovery, 3, p.73–96, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levy, G. M. (1993) Packaging in the Environment, p.1–33, Blackie Academic & Professional, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Lox, F. (1994) Waste Management - Life Cycle Analysis of Packaging, Final Report of Contract Number B4–3040/014093 for European Commission DGXI/A/4, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lundholm M., P ; Sundström, G. (1986) Tetra Brik Environmental Profile Report Tetrapak, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lundholm M., P ; Sundström, G. (1989) Tetra Brik Aseptic Environmental Profile, Report Tetrapak, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mata, T. (1998) Comparação de Processos de Reutilização e Reciclagem, usando a Metodologia de Análise de Ciclo-de-Vida, M. Sc. Thesis, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SETAC (1992) Life cycle assessment: inventory, classification, valuation, databases, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, workshop report, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaltegger, S. et.al. (1996) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-Quo vadis? Birkhauser Verlag, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Steen, B.; Ryding S-O. (1992) The EPS Enviro-Accounting Method, Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL), Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Udo de Haes, H., A. (1996) Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  20. UNEP (1996) Environmental Management in the Brewing Industry, United Nations Environmental Programme, Industry and Environment, Technical Report n°33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vignon, A., (1988) Recycling is the Future for Glass, Emballage Dig, no.318, France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mata, T.M., Costa, C.A.V. (1999). LCA: Comparison Between Recycle and Reuse of Glass Beer Bottles. In: Sikdar, S.K., Diwekar, U. (eds) Tools and Methods for Pollution Prevention. NATO Science Series, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4445-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4445-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4445-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics