Abstract
Ethnomethodological studies of talk in educational settings are concerned with the explication of the ‘routine grounds of everyday life’ (Garfinkel, 1967) in classrooms, staff meetings, diagnostic and testing sessions, parent-teacher interviews, and other settings in which the practical work of schooling goes on. These studies are concerned to show, through careful and detailed analyses of actual interactive events, how members in these settings use talk and other resources to accomplish the phenomena and objects that are otherwise treated as givens in social science and education. Ethnomethodological studies examine how members in educational studies achieve as orderly, recognisable and accountable such matters as lessons, the institutional categories of “teachers” and “students”, what counts as reading, classroom order or disorder, teacher authority, power, formality, student ability, and a host of other presences in school life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, C. & Freebody, P.: 1989, ‘Talk around text: constructions of textual and teacher authority in classroom discourse’, in S. De Castell, A. Luke & C. Luke (eds.), Language, Authority and Criticism: Readings on the School Textbook, Falmer, London, 263–283.
Baker, C. & Perrott, C.: 1988, ‘The news session in infants and primary school classrooms’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 9(1), 19–38.
Baker, C. & Keogh, J.: 1995, ‘Accounting for achievement in parent-teacher interviews’, Human Studies 18(2-3), 263–300.
Boden, D.: 1994, The Business of Talk: Organisations in Action, Polity, Cambridge.
Cicourel, A.V., Jennings, K.H., Jennings, S.H.M., Leiter, K.C.W., Mackay, R., Mehan, H. & Roth, D.R.: 1974, Language Use and School Performance, Academic Press, New York.
French, P. & MacLure, M.: 1979, ‘Getting the right answer and getting the answer right’, Research in Education 22, 2–23.
French, P. & MacLure, M.: 1981, ‘Teachers’ questions, pupils’ Answers: An investigation of questions and answers in the infant classroom’, First Language ii, 31–45.
Garfinkel, H.: 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gronn, P.: 1983, ‘Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration’, Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 1–21.
Gronn, P.: 1984, ‘“I have a solution … ”: Administrative power in a school meeting’, Educational Administration Quarterly 20(2), 65–92.
Heap, J.L.: 1979, ‘Rumplestiltskin: The organisation of preference in a reading lesson’, Analytic Sociology 2(2), card 1.
Heap, J.L.: 1985, ‘Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons’, Curriculum Inquiry 15, 245–279.
Heap, J.L.: 1991, ‘A situated perspective on what counts as reading’, in C.D. Baker & A. Luke (eds.), Towards a Critical Sociology of Reading Pedagogy, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 103–139.
Heritage, J.: 1984, Garfinkel & Ethnomethodology, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
Hester, S.: 1985, ‘Ethnomethodology and the study of deviance in schools’, in R. Burgess (ed.), Strategies of educational research, Falmer, London, 243–264.
Hester, S.: 1992, ‘Recognising references to deviance in referral talk’, in G. Watson & R.M. Seiler (eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, Sage, Newbury Park, 156–174.
Hester, S. & Eglin, P.: 1997, ‘The reflexive constitution of category, predicate and context in two settings’, in S. Hester & P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. University Press of America, 25–48.
Heyman, R.: 1986, ‘Formulating topic in the classroom’, Discourse Processes 9, 37–55.
Hustler, D.E. & Payne, G.C.F.: 1982, ‘Power in the classroom’, Research in Education 28, 49–64.
MacBeth, D.H.: 1990, ‘Classroom order as practical action: The making and un-making of a quiet reproach’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(2), 189–214.
MacKay, R.W.: 1974, ‘Conceptions of children and models of socialization’, in R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 180–193.
MacLure, M. & French, P.: 1980, ‘Routes to right answers: On pupils’ strategies for answering teachers’ questions’, in P. Woods (ed.), Pupil Strategies, Croom Helm, London, 74–93.
McDermott, R.P.: 1976, Kids Make Sense: An Ethnographic Account of the Interactional Management of Success and Failure in One First-Grade Classroom, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
McDermott, R.P.: 1977, ‘Social relations as contexts for learning in school’, Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 198–213.
McHoul, A.W.: 1978, ‘The organisation of turns at formal talk in the classroom’, Language in Society 7, 183–213.
McHoul, A.W. & Watson, D.R.: 1984, ‘Two axes for the analysis of “commonsense” and “formal” geographical knowledge in classroom talk’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 5, 281–302.
McHoul, A.W: 1991, ‘Reading S’, in C.D. Baker & A. Luke (eds.), Towards a Critical Sociology of Reading Pedagogy, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 191–201.
Mehan, H.: 1979, Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mehan, H.: 1983, ‘The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision-making’, Language in Society 12, 187–211.
Mehan, H.: 1991, ‘The school’s work of sorting students’, in D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk & Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Polity, Cambridge, 71–90.
Payne, G.C.F & Cuff, E.C. (eds.): 1982, Doing Teaching: The Practical Management of Classrooms, Batsford, London.
Payne, G.: 1976, ‘Making a lesson happen: An ethnomethodological analysis’, in M. Hammersley & P. Woods (eds.), The Process of Schooling, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 33–40.
Payne, G. & Hustler, D.: 1980, ‘Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 1(1), 49–66.
Sacks, H.: 1972, ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology’, in D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, The Free Press, New York, 31–74.
Sacks, H.: 1992, Lectures on Conversation, Vols I and II. Edited by G. Jefferson. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G.: 1974, ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation’, Language 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E.A.: 1988, ‘Description in the social sciences I: talk-in-interaction’, IpRA Papers in Pragmatics 2(1-2), 1–24.
Silverman, D. & Gubrium, J.F.: 1994, ‘Competing strategies for analysing the contexts of social interaction’, Sociological Inquiry 642, 179–198.
Speier, M.: 1976, ‘The child as conversationalist: Some culture contact features of conversational interactions between adults and children’, in M. Hammersley & P. Woods (eds.), The Process of Schooling, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 98–103.
Zimmerman, D.: 1992, ‘Achieving context: Openings in emergency calls’, in G. Watson & R.M. Seiler (eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, Sage, Newbury Park, 35–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, C. (1997). Ethnomethodological Studies of Talk in Educational Settings. In: Davies, B., Corson, D. (eds) Oral Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4417-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4417-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4930-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4417-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive