Skip to main content

The Rational Foundations of Income Inequality Measurement

  • Chapter
Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 71))

Abstract

People die in revolutions fighting inequalities. inequalities. “Men are free and equal in rights” is the political basis of democratic societies, and these rights may more or less include rights to consumption or income. Inequality, notably of incomes, is related to practically all important problems of society, as cause or as effect. But one generally has to compare unequal situations: When is one less unequal than the other? Does the transfer of one dollar from a richer to a poorer diminish inequality, given that it certainly augments inequality between the relatively poor receiver and the still poorer and equally poor, and between the relatively rich giver and the still richer and equally rich? In another respect, if the two-person income distribution (2,4) is as unequal as the distribution (1,2) because the ratios of incomes are the same, is inequality also unchanged when the distribution (0.01,1) is transformed into the distribution (0.1,10) by the multiplication of all incomes by the same number 10? In the transfer case, whatever its effect on inequality the transfer from richer to poorer may be good because it alleviates one person’s poverty, or it may be just.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amiel, Y. and F. Cowell. 1992. “Measurement of Income Inequality.” Journal of Public Economics 47: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrebi, Z.M. and J. Silber. 1985. “Income Inequality Indices and Deprivation: A Generalization.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 807–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. and A.B. Chakraborty. 1984. “On Indices of Relative Deprivation.” Economic Letters 14: 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., M. Chattopadhyay and A. Majumder. 1995. “Income Inequality and Relative Deprivation.” Keio Economic Studies 32: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J.M. and D. Ray. 1994. “On the Measurement of Polarization.” Econometrica 62: 819–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G. 1993. “Inequality in Dual Economy Models.” The Economic Journal 103: 1228–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E. and C. Seidl. 1994. “Perceptional Inequality and Preferential Judgement: An Empirical Examination of Distributional Axioms.” Public Choice 79: 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G., J. Littlewood and G. Polya. 1934. Inequalities. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1966a. “The Optimal Production of Social Justice.” In Proceedings ofthe International Economic Association Conference on Public Economics, Biarritz; in H. Guitton and J. Margolis, eds., Economie Publique, Paris: CNRS, 1968, pp. 109–177, and in Public Economics, London: Macmillan, 1969, pp. 145-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1966b. Les Choix Financiers et Monétaires (Théorie et Technique Modernes). Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1971. Justice et Equité. Paris: CEPREMAP. Reprinted Paris: CNRS, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1973a. “Rectifiances et dominances intégrales de tous degrés.” Working Paper. Paris: CEPREMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1973b. “More Equal Distributions of Bundles of Commodities.” Working Paper. Paris: CEPREMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1975. “Multidimensional Inequality Comparisons.” Working Paper. Paris: CEPREMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1976a. “Unequal Inequalities, I.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 416–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1976b. “Unequal Inequalities, II.” Journal of Economic Theory 13: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1977. “Multidimensional Egalitarianism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1990. The General Theory of Justice. Paris: CERAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1991. “The Normative Economics of Unanimity and Equality: Equity, Adequacy and Fundamental Dominance.” In K.J. Arrow, ed., Markets and Welfare. London: Macmillan, for the International Economics Association, pp. 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1993a. “Distributive Justice.” In R. Goodin and P. Pettit, eds., A Companion to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 438–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1993b. Equal Liberty. Paris: CGPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1994. “The Meaning of Fundamental Preferences.” Social Choice and Welfare 11: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1996a. Modern Theories of Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1996b. “The Theory of Justice.” Social Choice and Welfare 13: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1996c. “Intermediate Measures of Inequality.” Working Paper. Paris: CGPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1997. Justice and Equity. English translation with new Foreword. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1998. “Chance and Justice: Social Policy and the Harsanyi-Vickrey-Rawls Problem.” European Economic Review 43: 1393–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski, A. 1952. “Sur quelques applications des fonctions convexes et concaves au sens de I. Schur.” Journal de Mathematiques Pures et Appliquées 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podder, N. 1996. “Relative Deprivation, Envy, and Economic Inequality.” Kyklos 49: 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E. and L. Lagrou. 1983. “An Empirical Approach to Distributive Justice.” Journal of Public Economics 21: 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E. and B. Overlaet. 1989. “Moral Intuitions and Economic Models of Distributive Justice.” Social Choice and Welfare 6: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, M. 1994. “When Inequalities Diverge.” American Economic Review 84(2): 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1970. “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2:244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. 1920. “The Measurement of Inequality of Incomes.” Economic Journal 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1966. “The Optimal Production of Social Justice.” In International Economic Association Conference on Public Economics, Biarritz, Proceedings, and in H. Guitton and J. Margolis, eds., Economie Publique, Paris: CNRS, 1968, pp. 109–177, and Public Economics, London: Macmillan, 1969, pp. 145-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podder, N. 1996. “Relative Deprivation, Envy and Economic Inequality.” Kyklos 49(3): 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1973. On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolm, SC. (1999). The Rational Foundations of Income Inequality Measurement. In: Silber, J. (eds) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4413-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics