Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 17))

Abstract

Irrigation and precipitation runoff from agricultural fields contributes to topsoil loss and to the sedimentation of river basins. The movement of suspended soil particles from fields to streams can also serve as a transport mechanism for agricultural chemicals. These agricultural nonpoint sources of pollution (NSP) are receiving increased attention from water quality regulators. Potential actions to curb such pollutants include regulating runoff and return flows, restricting chemical applications, and imposing agricultural best management practices (BMP), such as catch-basins and tailwater recovery systems. An improved technology, Polyacrylamide polymer (PAM), may offer a cost-effective alternative for reducing the transport of chemicals on soil particles. PAM can be added to irrigation water or spread directly on fields to flocculate the suspended soil particles, causing them to settle out of the water column. This chapter explored the conditions under which the on-farm benefits (such as reduced topsoil loss, increased infiltration, reduced water use and reduced chemical use) will be sufficient to promote the adoption of PAM, and the conditions under which additional incentives may be needed to encourage innovative technological adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bahr, G.L. and T.D. Stieber. 1996. “Reduction of Nutrient and Pesticide Losses Through the Application of Polyacrylamide in Surface Irrigated Crops,” in Sojka, R.E. and R.D. Lentz eds., Managing Irrigation Induced Erosion and Infiltration with Polyacrylamide, pp. 41–48. Miscellaneous Publication No. 101-96, University of Idaho, Twin Falls, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D.L., C.E. Brockway, and K.K. Tanji. 1993. “Controlling Erosion and Sediment Loss from Furrow Irrigated Cropland.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119(6): 975–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, M. and D. Zilberman. 1985. “The Choices of Irrigation Technologies in California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., S.A. Hatchett, and E.T. Loehman. 1991. “Modeling Regional Irrigation Decisions and Drainage Pollution Control.” Natural Resource Modeling 5(2): 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A. and D. Zilberman. 1991. Effects of Input Quality and Environmental Conditions on the Selection of Irrigation Technologies, pp. 229–250. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.L. and R.A. Young. 1988. “Assessing Strategies for the Control of Irrigation Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R.C. and D.W. Bromley. 1982. “Agricultural offoff as a Nonpoint Externality: A Theoretical Development.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64: 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfand, G.E. and B.W. House. 1995. “Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution under Heterogeneous Conditions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(4): 1024–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.J. and G.L. Casier. 1979. “Internalizing Externalities of Phosphorus Discharges from Crop Production to Surface Water: Effluent Taxes versus Uniform Reductions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(2): 309–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, R. D. 1996. “Irrigation,” pp. 162–165. McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology, USA.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleboe, D. 1995. “PAM: An Ally for Furrow Irrigators.” The Sugarbeet Grower, pp. 8–10. (February)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchan, H., P. Osterli, and J. Letey. 1993. “Polymers Check Furrow Erosion, Help River Life.” California Agriculture 47(5): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortle, J.S. and J.W. Dunn. 1986. “The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojka, R.E. and R.D. Lentz. 1994. “Time for Yet Another Look at Soil Conditioners.” Soil Science 158(4): 233–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996a. “A PAM Primer: A Brief History of PAM and PAM-related Issues,” in R.E. Sojka, and R.D. Lentz, eds., Managing Irrigation Induced Erosion and Infiltration with Polyacrylamide, pp. 11–20. Miscellaneous Publication No. 101-96, University of Idaho, Twin Falls, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996b. “Polyacrylamide for Furrow Irrigation Erosion Control.” Irrigation Journal 64: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA et al. (U.S. Department of Agriculture; Soil Conservation Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service; University of California; Cooperative Extension; and West Stanislaus Resource Conservation District.) 1991. West Stanislaus Hydrologic Unit Area Project: 1991 Progress Report.CA: Stanislaus County.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. West Stanislaus Hydrologic Unit Area Project: 1992 Progress Report. CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. West Stanislaus Hydrologie Unit Area Project: 1995 Progress Report. CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/SCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). 1992. West Stanislaus Sediment Reduction Plan.Stanislaus County, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCCE (University of California, Cooperative Extension). 1996a. Formation of Drainage Authority Becomes a Possibility, p. 1. Modesto, CA: Westside Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996b. Preliminary Polymer Trial Results Promising but Inconclusive, p. 5. Modesto, CA: Westside Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. Powerblocks Revisited, pp. 1–2. Westside Water, Modesto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. and K. Segerson. 1995. “The Impact of Policies and Land Characteristics on Potential Groundwater Pollution in Wisconsin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(4): 1033–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Frank Casey Andrew Schmitz Scott Swinton David Zilberman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, D.D., Caswell, M.F. (1999). Technological Innovation to Remove Water Pollutants. In: Casey, F., Schmitz, A., Swinton, S., Zilberman, D. (eds) Flexible Incentives for the Adoption of Environmental Technologies in Agriculture. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4395-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4395-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5888-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4395-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics