Advertisement

The Subtractive and Nihilistic Modes of Silence: Heidegger and Beckett, Wittgenstein and Giacometti

  • Steven Bindeman
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 62)

Abstract

How is it possible to mean more than we actually say? Why would we want to do so in the first place? Why would we ever wish to use language in such a way that we would want to transcend its logical form and its informative purpose? Finally, how could silence ever perform the function, through such indirect discourse, of reaching beyond the limits of language? Such questions reflect the painful realization that there are times when we are unable to articulate (either to ourselves or to others) what we really want to say. Such moments place us in a situation of uncanniness, whereby we are forced to confront the essential disconnectedness between ourselves and the world around us. The common reaction to this moment of silence is to fill it up with words, since it’s not the sort of experience one wants to endure for long. When we confront language with silence, the nature of language, and the constructed world it encompasses, both undergo significant changes.

Keywords

Mystical Experience Indirect Discourse Idle Talk Momentary Loss Linguistic Framing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Appelbaum, D. (1996). Disruption. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beckett, S. (1995). “Texts for Nothing 1–13.” [1950–1952]. In The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, S. (1955). Molloy. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, S. (1956). Malone Dies. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, S. (1957). Murphy. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beckett, S. (1958). The Unnamable. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bindeman, S (1981). Heidegger and Wittgenstein: The Poetics of Silence. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  8. Bindeman, S. (1996). “Schizophrenia and Postmodernism: Critical Analysis of a Concept.” The Humanist Psychologist, 24, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruns, G. (1989). “Disappeared: Heidegger and the Emancipation of Language.” In S. Budick and W. Iser (eds.), Languages of the Unsayable: The Play of Negativity in Literature and Literary Theory. NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gendlin, Eugene (1992) “Celebrations and Problems of Humanistic Psychology.” The Humanist Psychologist, 20, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassan, I. (1967). The Literature of Silence: Henry Miller and Samuel Beckett. NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (1962) [1929]. Being and Time (trans. J. Macquarrie). NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1977) [1943]. “The Word of Nietzsche: God is Dead.” In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans. W. Lovitt). NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1971) [1960]. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Poetry, Language, Thought (trans. A. Hofstadter). NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  15. Janik, A. and Toulmin, S. (1973). Wittgenstein’s Vienna, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Kotoh, T. (1987). “Language and Silence: Self Inquiry in Heidegger and Zen.” In G. Parkes, Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  17. Lord, J. (1965). A Giacometti Portrait. NY: The Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  18. Mauriac, C. (1959). The New Literature. NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
  19. Motzkin, G. (1989). “Heidegger’s Transcendent Nothing.” In Budick, S. and Iser, W., (eds.), Languages of the Unsayable: The Play of Negativity in Literature and Literary Theory. NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Perloff, M. (1996). Wittgenstein’s Ladder: Poetic Language and the Strangeness of the Ordinary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ricoeur, P. (1968). “The Critique of Subjectivity and Cogito in the Philosophy of Heidegger.” In M. Frings (ed.), Heidegger and the Quest for Truth. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  22. Sylvester, D. (1994). Looking at Giacometti. NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (1961) [1921]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (trans. D. Pears and B. McGuinness). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Bindeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Strayer UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations