Skip to main content

Underspecified Semantics in HPSG

  • Chapter
Computing Meaning

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 73))

Abstract

Theories of semantic underspecification assign semantically ambiguous sentences a unique semantic representation. In computational applications of natural language processing, the need for a compact representation arises in order to avoid potentially highly disjunctive specifications of different readings which scope ambiguities may introduce. Typical instances of ambiguities treated by underspecification are scope ambiguities of adjectives in NPs with respect to PPs as illustrated in (la), and different possible scopings of a quantifier with respect to some other scope-bearing element in sentences like (lb) (cf. Pinkal, 1995; Reyle, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, S. (1996) Wh-constructions and transparent logical form. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. (1995) Predicate logic unplugged. In Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J., B. Gambäck, Chr. Lieske, Y. Mori, M. Pinkal, and K. Worm (1996) Compositional semantics in Verbmobil. In Proceedings of COLING ′96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. (1996) Toward a minimalist theory of syntactic structure. In H. Bunt and A. van Horck (eds.) Discontinuous Constituency. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 11–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1994) Verb Second by lexical rule or by underspecification. Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340 43. Universität Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A., and U. Reyle (1995) Principle based semantics for HPSG. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9–16. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallin, D (1975) Intensional and higher order modal logic. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, T., and D. Meurers (1995) Compiling HPSG type constraints into definite clause programs. In ACL ′95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof (1982) 1982. Semantic analysis of whcomplements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5:175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, E., D. Meurers, F. Richter, M. Sailer, and H. Winhart (1997) Ein HPSG-Fragment des Deutschen, Teil 1: Theorie. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, nr. 95. Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1988) Probleme der freien Wortstellung im Deutschen. Sprache und Pragmatik 5:8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathol, A. (1995) Linearization-based German syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. (1994) Extraposition in HPSG. Verbmobil Report 30. Institute for Logic and Linguistics, IBM Scientific Center, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. J (1994) An expanded logical formalism for Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 59. Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J. (1992) Constraint-based semantics. In Proceedings of the 8th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, 425–444. Institute for Logic, Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkal, M. (1995) Radical underspecification. In Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, 587–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C., and I. Sag (1987) Information based syntax and semantics. Vol.1: Fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C., and I. Sag (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U. (1993) Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: construction, representation and deduction. Journal of Semantics 10(2):123–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, F., and M. Sailer (1996) Syntax für eine unterspezifizierte Semantik: PP-Anbindung in einem deutschen HPSG-Fragment. In Präpositionalsemantik und PP-Anbindung, ed. S. Mehl, A. Mertens, and M. Schulz. 39–47. Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Duisburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verlinden, M. (1999) A constraint-based grammar for dialogue utterances. Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richter, F., Sailer, M. (1999). Underspecified Semantics in HPSG. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0290-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4231-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics