Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 288))

Abstract

There are two basic ways to justify disbelief in God. The first is by means of the argument from evil. One argues that evil is either inconsistent with the existence of a being who is all powerful, all knowing and all good or else that evil makes the existence of such a being unlikely. The second is to show that the concept of God is incoherent or in some other respect is conceptually impossible. For example, one argues that one attribute of God is inconsistent with another and, thus, that God cannot exist. Or one might maintain that some attribute that is essential to God is not one that God could possess. Consequently, God could not exist. It is this second way that I will explore in this paper. Elsewhere I have argued that there are at least three conceptual difficulties with the concept of God: one connected with God’s omniscience, another with His freedom, and still another with His omnipotence.1 Here I will only have time to consider some of those problems connected with omniscience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumenfeld, David (1978), “On the Compossibility of the Divine Attributes,” Philosophical Studies 34, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim, Patrick (1983), “Some Neglected Problems of Omniscience,” American Philosophical Quarterly 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, Patrick (1985), “Against Omniscience: The Case from Essential Indexicals,” Nous 19, 151–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlyn, D.W. (1970), The Theory of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Croix, Richard R. (1975), “Swinburne on Omnipotence,” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 6, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazerowitz, Morris (1983), “On a Property of a Perfect Being,” Mind 92, 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Michael (1970), “A Disproof of God’s Existence,” Darshana International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Michael (1974), “A Disproof of the God of the Common Man,” Question, 115-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Michael (1982), “Impersonal Knowledge,” Dialogos 40, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Michael (1990), Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Thomas V. (1986), The Logic of God Incarnate. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puccetti, Roland (1963), “Is Omniscience Possible?,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41, 92–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Israel (1965), Conditions of Knowledge. Chicago, Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard (1977), The Coherence of Theism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, M. (2000). Omniscience and Incoherence. In: HolmstrÖm-Hintikka, G. (eds) Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times. Synthese Library, vol 288. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4227-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4227-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5835-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4227-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics