Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the ecological integrity of rivers: walking the line among ecological, political and administrative interests

  • Conference paper
Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 149))

  • 819 Accesses

Abstract

This article considers the interactions among science, politics, public administration and the general public within the framework of the assessment of biological condition as it pertains to ecological integrity. Strong public concern for environmental protection and health helps to shape policy. The legislative mandate of “maintaining and restoring the ecological integrity of waters” is both a statement of political will and a commitment. The public administration bears the responsibility for efficient water management under the auspices of maintaining a high quality of environmental health. The increasing complexity of perspectives on environmental topics increases the input of ecological sciences to the administrative process. Ecologists play an essential role in advancing scientific knowledge, developing methods to implement legislative mandates and educating the public (and public officials) about natural processes and interactions, as well as the ecological consequences of human activities. A variety of questions posed at the administration level concerning both pollution and physical impairments can be answered by biological assessment. With emphasis on benthic macroinvertebrates and levels of taxonomic resolution, examples from Austria are provided to show the efforts necessary to maintain scientific accuracy whilst maintaining practicality. Some examples of species-centred and community-based surrogate parameters used in Austria to assess the ecological integrity of rivers are presented (e. g. saprobiological aspects, functional feeding groups, longitudinal zonation analysis).

This article is dedicated to all who are engaged in ensuring the survival of our remaining natural aquatic resources and the successful restoration of those riverine landscapes impaired by human uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr, 1994. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Trans. am. Fish.Soc. 113(6): 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austrian Federal Government, 1995. National Environmental Plan. Ministry for Environmental Affairs, Vienna: 324 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austrian Standards M 6232, 1997. Önorm M 6232: Guidelines for the ecological study and assessment of rivers, Vienna: 1-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind, E. & O. Moog, 2000. Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity — a methodological approach. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H., W. Foissner & F. Kohmann, 1997. Bestimmung und Ökologie der Mikrosaprobien nach DIN 38410. G. Fischer, Stuttgart: 1-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. Jr. & J. R. Pratt, 1993. A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York: 10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec, A., in press. Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of the ecological integrity of aquatic systems — a new assessment approach. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec A., H. Heger, V. Koller-Kreimel, O. Moog, T. Spindler & H. Waidbacher, 1994. Anforderungen an die Erhebung und Beurteilung der ökologischen Funktionsfähigkeit von Fließgewässern-eine Diskussionsgrundlage. ÖWAW 11/12: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, P. S., 1990. Biomonitoring and invertebrate taxonomy. Envir. Monit. Assess. 14: 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 18: 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W. & M. J. Klug, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danecker, E., 1992. Phototrophe und Heterotrophe Organismen als Indikatoren der Verunreinigung von Fliessgewässern. Wiener Mitteilungen 105: 26 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon, 1995. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 1-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N. & G. Vanhooren, 1983. Method for biological quality assessment of water courses in Belgium. Hydrobic logia 100: 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1977. Biological integrity of waters — an historical approach. In Ballentine, R. K. & L. J. Guarraia (eds), The Integrity of Water. Proceedings of a symposium. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, G., 1992. Ökologische Bewertung von Fließgewässern — eine unlösbare Aufgabe? In Friedrich, G. & J. Lacombe (eds), Ökologische Bewertung von Fließgewässern. Limnologie aktuell 3, G. Fischer Vlg., Stuttgart-New York: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M. T., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1984. The influence of seasonal and taxonomic facts on the ordination and classification of running water-sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro-invertebrate communities. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, W., U. Grasser & J. Waringer, 1995. Trichoptera. In Moog, O. (ed.), Fauna Aquatica Austriaca — A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes. Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry. Wasserwirtschaftskataster Vienna: loose-leaf binder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L., 1982. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality in streams. Technical Bulletin No. 132, Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources: 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L., 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. The Great Lakes Entomologist 20,1: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • lilies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et methodes de la classification et de la zonation ecologique des eaux courantes. considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. In:. Verein, theor. und angew. Limnologie 12: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janecek, B., C. Orendt & O. Moog 1995. Tanypodinae. In Moog. O. (ed.), Fauna Aquatica Austriaca — A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Noies. Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, Wasserwirtschaftskataster Vienna: loose-leaf binder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. L., W. B. Richardson & T. J. Naimo, 1995. Pas, present, and future Concepts in Large River Ecology. BioScience 45(3): 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., 1986. Flußbau und Fischerei. Quantitative Untersuchungen über die Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher Flußre gulierungen auf Fischbestände. Wr. Mitt. Bd. 70, Institut für Wasserwirtschaft, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1996. Ecological integrity and ecological health are nor the same. In Schulze, P. (ed.), Engineering Within Ecological Constraints. National Academy of Science, Washingtor D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. & I. J. Dudley, 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Envir. Manage. 5: 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. D. Angermeier, P. R. Yart & I. J Schlosser, 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running wa ters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, A. & G. A. Janauer, 1996. Zur Methodik der Untersuchungen von aquatischen Makrophyten in Fließgewässern. In Steinberg, C., H. Bernhardt & H. Klapper (eds., Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie. Grundlagen — Gewässerbelastung — Restaurierung — Aquatische Ökotoxikologie — Bewertung — Gewässerschutz, ecomed, Landsberg am Lech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance value, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 12(3): 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. & M. T. Barbour, 1994. Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Structure for Rapid, Cost-effective, Water Quality Monitoring: Rapid Bioassessment. In Loeb, S. L. & A. Spacie (eds), Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, Lewis Publishers: 187-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. J. & G. B. Wiggins, 1979. Ecological diversity in Trichoptera. Ann. Rev. Ent. 24: 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauch, E., 1990. Ein Verfahren zur gesamtökologischen Bewertung der Gewässer. Wasser + Boden 11/1190: 763–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins (eds), 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd edn. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. L., 1989. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. Envir. Pollut. 60: 101–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., 1991. Biologische Parameter zum Bewerten der Gewässergüte von Fließgewässern. Wien, Landschaftswasserbau 11: 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., 1992. Das Konzept der biozönotischen Regionen — ein Hilfsmittel zur Charakteristik anthropogener Einflüsse auf benthische Fließgewässerzönosen. Erw. Zusammenfassung der DGL Jahrestagung 1992, Bd. II: 622-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., 1994. Ökologische Funktionsfähigkeit des aquatischen Lebensraumes. Wiener Mitt. 120: 15–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O. (ed.), 1995. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca — A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes. Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, Wasserwirtschaftskataster Vienna: loose-leaf binder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., in press. Biological River Water Quality Assessment in Austria. Proceedings of the “Internat. Workshop on Assessment and Classification of Rivers”, Düsseldorf 5-7.11.1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O. & A. Chovanec, 1998. Die ökologische Funktionsfähigkeit — ein Ansatz der integrierten Gewässerbewertung in Österreich. Münchener Beiträge zur Abwasser-, Fischerei-und Flußbiologie 51, Oldenburg Verlag München, Wien: 57-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O. & M. Car, 1995. Simuliidae. In Moog, O. (ed.), Fauna Aquatica Austriaca — A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes. Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, Wasserwirtschaftskataster Vienna: loose-leaf binder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., A. Schmidt-Kloiber & R. Vogel, 1997. Ecoprof — Entwicklung und Erprobung eines Auswertungsmodelles zur Beurteilung der ökologischen Funktionsfähigkeit auf Basis benthischer Fließgewässerzönosen. Report BMLF, Vienna. The computer software Ecoprof is available at the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Sektion IV, A-1030 Vienna, Marxerg. 2, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., M. Kainz, M. Kaufmann & M. Schwarz, 1998. Erhebung und Bilanzierung flußtypspe/.ifisch erhaltener Fließgewässerabschnitte in Österreich. ÖWAW 50: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orendt, C., 1993. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Ökologie litoraler, benthischer Chironomidae und anderer Diptera (Ceratopogonidae, Chaoboridae) in Seen des nördlichen Alpenvorlandes, mit einem Beitrag zur Eignung und Verwendung von Chironomiden als Trophie-Indikatoren. Thesis Univ. München: 1-274, 18 tables.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & J. D. Unzicker, 1975. Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. J. Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 47, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic invertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York: 1–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M., H. V. Danks & D. M. Lehmkuhl, 1986. Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Envir. Manage. 10: 773–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rott, E., K. Hofmann, P. Pall, P. Pfister & E. Pipp, 1997. Indikatorlisten für Aufwuchsalgen — Teil 1: Saprobielle Indikation. Bundesministerium für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Wien: 1-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, R. J., 1994. Ecosystem health as a management goal. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 13(4): 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubauer, I. & O. Moog, in press. Taxonomic sufficiency versus need of information — comments based on the Austrian experiences in biological water quality monitoring. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations). 1992. Report of the Conference on Environment and Development The Earth Summit. Rio de Janeiro, June 3-14, 1992, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waringer, J. & W. Graf, 1997. Atlas der österreichischen Köcherfliegenlarven. Facultas-Universitätsverlag, Vienna: 1-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan, 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57, 3: 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BOKU-University of Agricultural Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Str. 17, A-1180, Vienna, Austria

    Otto Moog & Andreas Chovanec

  2. Federal Environment Agency, Spittelauer Lände 5, A-1090, Vienna, Austria

    Otto Moog & Andreas Chovanec

Authors
  1. Otto Moog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Chovanec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

M. Jungwirth S. Muhar S. Schmutz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moog, O., Chovanec, A. (2000). Assessing the ecological integrity of rivers: walking the line among ecological, political and administrative interests. In: Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (eds) Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5814-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4164-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation