Abstract
In his monograph Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man, Husserl presented a striking contrast between Greek philosophy taking a ‘theoretical’ attitude towards the world and Oriental philosophy taking a ‘practical’ one, and further inferred that there must be some sharp cleavages between the ideal images, the spiritual structures and the cultural accomplishments of Occidental and Oriental peoples’ lives.1 I have tried to show why this point of view is an ‘essential insight’ into the fundamental differences between the rational spirit of Western philosophy and the practical spirit of Chinese philosophy, and how the differences have brought about some noticeable distinctions between Western life as Logos and Chinese life as Tao.2 The purpose of this essay will be to explain how the two kinds of life are endowed with distinctive vital, moral and aesthetic senses respectively by Greek and Chinese pre-Qin philosophies through their interpretations, which were given under the guidance of two different kinds of attitudes or spirits and three basis concepts - ‘the true’, ‘the good’ and ‘the beautiful’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cf. Edmund Husserl, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, trans. Quentin Lauer (New York: Harper and Row, 1965), pp. 149–192.
Cf. Qingping Liu, “Life: as Logos and Tao-On Husserl’s Ideas and the Comparative Study of Western and Chinese Philosophies,” a paper presented at The First International Congress in Philosophy, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Life held at the University of Macerata, Italy, in April, 1996. It is included in Analecta Husserliana, Vol. LII, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka.
Cf. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1979), pp. 219–220; Introduction of Metaphysics, trans. R. Manhaim (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), p. 102.
Heraclitus, Fragment 112 (DK 22 B112); See Charles M. Bakewell: Source Book in Ancient Philosophy (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909), p. 34.
Cf. Parmenides, frr. 1–8 (DK 28 B1-B8); See G. S. Kirk, J. E. Raven and M. Schofield: The Presocratic Philosophers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 242–254.
Plato, The Republic, 413a.
Aristotle, Metphysics, 993b.
Kirk, Raven and Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers, op. cit., pp. 202–203.
Plato, The Republic, 581b–583a.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1172b, 1178a.
See Plato, Meno, 86b.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1072b; The Nicomachean Ethics, 1177b-1178a.
Cf. Husserl, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, op. cit., pp. 158–159, 162, 173, 177, 191.
Duan Yucai, The Commentary on Shuo Wen Jie Zi.
Lao Zi, Ch. 19, Ch. 28, Ch. 54.
Zhuang Zi, Ch. 31.
Mencius, 4A: 12.
Xun Zi, 3: 9.
Lao Zi, Ch. 18, Ch. 19.
Xun Zi, 12: 3.
Lun Yu, 13: 18.
Zhu Xi, The Commentary on Lun Yu, 13: 18.
Husserl, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, op. cit., p. 166.
Ibid., p. 166.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1094a, 1178a.
See Plato, Meno, 86d–89d.
Plato, The Republic, 443e–444a, 508e.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1113a.
Democritus, Fragment 37 (DK 68 B37); See Bakewell: Source Book in Ancient philosophy, op. cit., p. 60.
Plato, The Republic, 441e–442b, 604b-604d.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1119b.
Lao Zi, Ch. 18.
Lun Yu, 1: 2.
Mencius, 2A: 6, 7A: 21.
Xun Zi, 22: 1, 22: 12.
Lun Yu, 4: 6, 7: 30, 12: 1.
Xun Zi, 23: 1.
Mencius, 6A: 6, 7B: 25.
Mencius, 7A: 1.
Plato, The Republic, 476b.
Aristotle, Poetics, 1450b–1451a; Metaphysics, 1078b.
Plato, The Republic, 377e–379b, 389b, 597b-598c, 603a.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1140a; Poetics, 1451a-1451b.
Plato, The Republic, 605a–607a.
Aristotle, Poetics, 1448b–1449a.
Lun Yu, 1: 12, 4: 1, 12: 16.
Mencius, 7B: 25.
Xun Zi, 19: 14.
Zhuang Zi, Ch. 22.
Lun Yu, 3: 3.
Lun Yu, 7: 6, 8: 8.
Mencius, 4A: 27.
Plato, Symposium, 204b; The Republic, 402a, 506a.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1078a.
Lun Yu, 6: 16, 3: 25.
Mencius, 7B: 25.
Zhuang Zi, Ch. 13.
Lun Yu, 11: 26.
Zhuang Zi, Ch. 21.
Plato, The Republic, 508e–509a; Phaedrus, 249b.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, 1094a, 1177a-1178a.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, Q. (2000). Life: the True, the Good and the Beautiful. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Origins of Life. Analecta Husserliana, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4058-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4058-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5786-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4058-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive